The epworth sleepiness scale: Conventional self vs physician administration

Mario Francesco Damiani, Vitaliano Nicola Quaranta, Vito Antonio Falcone, Felice Gadaleta, Michele Maiellari, Teresa Ranieri, Francesco Fanfulla, Pierluigi Carratù, Onofrio Resta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is a simple, self-administered questionnaire that provides a measurement of the subject's level of daytime sleepiness, and is widely used for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Some works undermined its accuracy. The aim of this study was to compare self-administered ESS scores to physician-administered scores in a sample of patients with suspicion of OSA. Methods: Patients were randomly divided into two groups: group 1, or the self-administered group (n = 113); and group 2, or the physician-administered group (n = 112). Patients in group 1 were asked to complete the ESS in the traditional way; in group 2, the ESS was administered by a sleep-medicine physician. Subjects in both groups underwent diagnostic in-laboratory portable monitoring (PM) within 1 week's time. Results: The percentage of questionnaires properly completed was significantly different between groups: 77% (87 of 113) in the group 1 vs 100% (112 of 112) in the group 2 (P =.00). Scores obtained when a physician administered the questionnaire (ESSp) were higher than those when the ESS was self administered (ESSs) (ESSp:12.09 ± 4.1 vs ESSs:10.37 ± 5.49; P =.01). The ESSp was more highly correlated with apnea-hypopnea index and oxygen desaturation index than the ESSs. Conclusions: Our results lead us to consider the physician-administered ESS to be more accurate than the traditional ESS; thus, our suggestion is to validate this new method of administration.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1569-1575
Number of pages7
JournalChest
Volume143
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2013

Fingerprint

Physicians
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Apnea
Sleep
Medicine
Oxygen
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Damiani, M. F., Quaranta, V. N., Falcone, V. A., Gadaleta, F., Maiellari, M., Ranieri, T., ... Resta, O. (2013). The epworth sleepiness scale: Conventional self vs physician administration. Chest, 143(6), 1569-1575. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.12-2174

The epworth sleepiness scale : Conventional self vs physician administration. / Damiani, Mario Francesco; Quaranta, Vitaliano Nicola; Falcone, Vito Antonio; Gadaleta, Felice; Maiellari, Michele; Ranieri, Teresa; Fanfulla, Francesco; Carratù, Pierluigi; Resta, Onofrio.

In: Chest, Vol. 143, No. 6, 06.2013, p. 1569-1575.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Damiani, MF, Quaranta, VN, Falcone, VA, Gadaleta, F, Maiellari, M, Ranieri, T, Fanfulla, F, Carratù, P & Resta, O 2013, 'The epworth sleepiness scale: Conventional self vs physician administration', Chest, vol. 143, no. 6, pp. 1569-1575. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.12-2174
Damiani MF, Quaranta VN, Falcone VA, Gadaleta F, Maiellari M, Ranieri T et al. The epworth sleepiness scale: Conventional self vs physician administration. Chest. 2013 Jun;143(6):1569-1575. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.12-2174
Damiani, Mario Francesco ; Quaranta, Vitaliano Nicola ; Falcone, Vito Antonio ; Gadaleta, Felice ; Maiellari, Michele ; Ranieri, Teresa ; Fanfulla, Francesco ; Carratù, Pierluigi ; Resta, Onofrio. / The epworth sleepiness scale : Conventional self vs physician administration. In: Chest. 2013 ; Vol. 143, No. 6. pp. 1569-1575.
@article{4fe36c4a9a2a4d21b0d9eb9a8a6a7c8a,
title = "The epworth sleepiness scale: Conventional self vs physician administration",
abstract = "Background: The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is a simple, self-administered questionnaire that provides a measurement of the subject's level of daytime sleepiness, and is widely used for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Some works undermined its accuracy. The aim of this study was to compare self-administered ESS scores to physician-administered scores in a sample of patients with suspicion of OSA. Methods: Patients were randomly divided into two groups: group 1, or the self-administered group (n = 113); and group 2, or the physician-administered group (n = 112). Patients in group 1 were asked to complete the ESS in the traditional way; in group 2, the ESS was administered by a sleep-medicine physician. Subjects in both groups underwent diagnostic in-laboratory portable monitoring (PM) within 1 week's time. Results: The percentage of questionnaires properly completed was significantly different between groups: 77{\%} (87 of 113) in the group 1 vs 100{\%} (112 of 112) in the group 2 (P =.00). Scores obtained when a physician administered the questionnaire (ESSp) were higher than those when the ESS was self administered (ESSs) (ESSp:12.09 ± 4.1 vs ESSs:10.37 ± 5.49; P =.01). The ESSp was more highly correlated with apnea-hypopnea index and oxygen desaturation index than the ESSs. Conclusions: Our results lead us to consider the physician-administered ESS to be more accurate than the traditional ESS; thus, our suggestion is to validate this new method of administration.",
author = "Damiani, {Mario Francesco} and Quaranta, {Vitaliano Nicola} and Falcone, {Vito Antonio} and Felice Gadaleta and Michele Maiellari and Teresa Ranieri and Francesco Fanfulla and Pierluigi Carrat{\`u} and Onofrio Resta",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1378/chest.12-2174",
language = "English",
volume = "143",
pages = "1569--1575",
journal = "Chest",
issn = "0012-3692",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The epworth sleepiness scale

T2 - Conventional self vs physician administration

AU - Damiani, Mario Francesco

AU - Quaranta, Vitaliano Nicola

AU - Falcone, Vito Antonio

AU - Gadaleta, Felice

AU - Maiellari, Michele

AU - Ranieri, Teresa

AU - Fanfulla, Francesco

AU - Carratù, Pierluigi

AU - Resta, Onofrio

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - Background: The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is a simple, self-administered questionnaire that provides a measurement of the subject's level of daytime sleepiness, and is widely used for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Some works undermined its accuracy. The aim of this study was to compare self-administered ESS scores to physician-administered scores in a sample of patients with suspicion of OSA. Methods: Patients were randomly divided into two groups: group 1, or the self-administered group (n = 113); and group 2, or the physician-administered group (n = 112). Patients in group 1 were asked to complete the ESS in the traditional way; in group 2, the ESS was administered by a sleep-medicine physician. Subjects in both groups underwent diagnostic in-laboratory portable monitoring (PM) within 1 week's time. Results: The percentage of questionnaires properly completed was significantly different between groups: 77% (87 of 113) in the group 1 vs 100% (112 of 112) in the group 2 (P =.00). Scores obtained when a physician administered the questionnaire (ESSp) were higher than those when the ESS was self administered (ESSs) (ESSp:12.09 ± 4.1 vs ESSs:10.37 ± 5.49; P =.01). The ESSp was more highly correlated with apnea-hypopnea index and oxygen desaturation index than the ESSs. Conclusions: Our results lead us to consider the physician-administered ESS to be more accurate than the traditional ESS; thus, our suggestion is to validate this new method of administration.

AB - Background: The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is a simple, self-administered questionnaire that provides a measurement of the subject's level of daytime sleepiness, and is widely used for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Some works undermined its accuracy. The aim of this study was to compare self-administered ESS scores to physician-administered scores in a sample of patients with suspicion of OSA. Methods: Patients were randomly divided into two groups: group 1, or the self-administered group (n = 113); and group 2, or the physician-administered group (n = 112). Patients in group 1 were asked to complete the ESS in the traditional way; in group 2, the ESS was administered by a sleep-medicine physician. Subjects in both groups underwent diagnostic in-laboratory portable monitoring (PM) within 1 week's time. Results: The percentage of questionnaires properly completed was significantly different between groups: 77% (87 of 113) in the group 1 vs 100% (112 of 112) in the group 2 (P =.00). Scores obtained when a physician administered the questionnaire (ESSp) were higher than those when the ESS was self administered (ESSs) (ESSp:12.09 ± 4.1 vs ESSs:10.37 ± 5.49; P =.01). The ESSp was more highly correlated with apnea-hypopnea index and oxygen desaturation index than the ESSs. Conclusions: Our results lead us to consider the physician-administered ESS to be more accurate than the traditional ESS; thus, our suggestion is to validate this new method of administration.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878562421&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878562421&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1378/chest.12-2174

DO - 10.1378/chest.12-2174

M3 - Article

C2 - 23450315

AN - SCOPUS:84878562421

VL - 143

SP - 1569

EP - 1575

JO - Chest

JF - Chest

SN - 0012-3692

IS - 6

ER -