The equivalence of SF-36 summary health scores estimated using standard and country-specific algorithms in 10 countries: Results from the IQOLA Project

John E. Ware, Barbara Gandek, Mark Kosinski, Neil K. Aaronson, Giovanni Apolone, John Brazier, Monika Bullinger, Stein Kaasa, Alain Leplège, Luis Prieto, Marianne Sullivan, Kate Thunedborg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Data from general population surveys (n = 1771 to 9151) in nine European countries (Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom) were analyzed to test the algorithms used to score physical and mental component summary measures (PCS-36/MCS-36) based on the SF-36 Health Survey. Scoring coefficients for principal components were estimated independently in each country using identical methods of factor extraction and orthogonal rotation. PCS-36 and MCS-36 scores were also estimated using standard (U.S.-derived) scoring algorithms, and results were compared. Product-moment correlations between scores estimated from standard and country-specific scoring coefficients were very high (0.98 to 1.00) for both physical and mental health components in all countries. As hypothesized for orthogonal components, correlations between physical and mental components within each country were very low (0.00 to 0.12) for both estimation methods. Mean scores for PCS-36 differed by as much as 3.0 points across countries using standard scoring, and mean scores for MCS-36 differed across countries by as much as 6.4 points. In view of the high degree of equivalence observed within each country, using standard and country-specific algorithms, we recommend use of standard scoring algorithms for purposes of multinational studies involving these 10 countries.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1167-1170
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume51
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 1998

Fingerprint

Health
Denmark
Norway
Health Surveys
Sweden
Netherlands
Spain
Italy
France
Germany
Mental Health
Population
United Kingdom
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Construct validity
  • Cross-cultural comparisons
  • Factor analysis
  • Health status indicators
  • SF-36 Health Survey
  • Translations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Epidemiology

Cite this

The equivalence of SF-36 summary health scores estimated using standard and country-specific algorithms in 10 countries : Results from the IQOLA Project. / Ware, John E.; Gandek, Barbara; Kosinski, Mark; Aaronson, Neil K.; Apolone, Giovanni; Brazier, John; Bullinger, Monika; Kaasa, Stein; Leplège, Alain; Prieto, Luis; Sullivan, Marianne; Thunedborg, Kate.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 51, No. 11, 11.1998, p. 1167-1170.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ware, JE, Gandek, B, Kosinski, M, Aaronson, NK, Apolone, G, Brazier, J, Bullinger, M, Kaasa, S, Leplège, A, Prieto, L, Sullivan, M & Thunedborg, K 1998, 'The equivalence of SF-36 summary health scores estimated using standard and country-specific algorithms in 10 countries: Results from the IQOLA Project', Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 1167-1170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00108-5
Ware, John E. ; Gandek, Barbara ; Kosinski, Mark ; Aaronson, Neil K. ; Apolone, Giovanni ; Brazier, John ; Bullinger, Monika ; Kaasa, Stein ; Leplège, Alain ; Prieto, Luis ; Sullivan, Marianne ; Thunedborg, Kate. / The equivalence of SF-36 summary health scores estimated using standard and country-specific algorithms in 10 countries : Results from the IQOLA Project. In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1998 ; Vol. 51, No. 11. pp. 1167-1170.
@article{9821dfd4801c48c88592569bc41584c8,
title = "The equivalence of SF-36 summary health scores estimated using standard and country-specific algorithms in 10 countries: Results from the IQOLA Project",
abstract = "Data from general population surveys (n = 1771 to 9151) in nine European countries (Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom) were analyzed to test the algorithms used to score physical and mental component summary measures (PCS-36/MCS-36) based on the SF-36 Health Survey. Scoring coefficients for principal components were estimated independently in each country using identical methods of factor extraction and orthogonal rotation. PCS-36 and MCS-36 scores were also estimated using standard (U.S.-derived) scoring algorithms, and results were compared. Product-moment correlations between scores estimated from standard and country-specific scoring coefficients were very high (0.98 to 1.00) for both physical and mental health components in all countries. As hypothesized for orthogonal components, correlations between physical and mental components within each country were very low (0.00 to 0.12) for both estimation methods. Mean scores for PCS-36 differed by as much as 3.0 points across countries using standard scoring, and mean scores for MCS-36 differed across countries by as much as 6.4 points. In view of the high degree of equivalence observed within each country, using standard and country-specific algorithms, we recommend use of standard scoring algorithms for purposes of multinational studies involving these 10 countries.",
keywords = "Construct validity, Cross-cultural comparisons, Factor analysis, Health status indicators, SF-36 Health Survey, Translations",
author = "Ware, {John E.} and Barbara Gandek and Mark Kosinski and Aaronson, {Neil K.} and Giovanni Apolone and John Brazier and Monika Bullinger and Stein Kaasa and Alain Lepl{\`e}ge and Luis Prieto and Marianne Sullivan and Kate Thunedborg",
year = "1998",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00108-5",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "1167--1170",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The equivalence of SF-36 summary health scores estimated using standard and country-specific algorithms in 10 countries

T2 - Results from the IQOLA Project

AU - Ware, John E.

AU - Gandek, Barbara

AU - Kosinski, Mark

AU - Aaronson, Neil K.

AU - Apolone, Giovanni

AU - Brazier, John

AU - Bullinger, Monika

AU - Kaasa, Stein

AU - Leplège, Alain

AU - Prieto, Luis

AU - Sullivan, Marianne

AU - Thunedborg, Kate

PY - 1998/11

Y1 - 1998/11

N2 - Data from general population surveys (n = 1771 to 9151) in nine European countries (Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom) were analyzed to test the algorithms used to score physical and mental component summary measures (PCS-36/MCS-36) based on the SF-36 Health Survey. Scoring coefficients for principal components were estimated independently in each country using identical methods of factor extraction and orthogonal rotation. PCS-36 and MCS-36 scores were also estimated using standard (U.S.-derived) scoring algorithms, and results were compared. Product-moment correlations between scores estimated from standard and country-specific scoring coefficients were very high (0.98 to 1.00) for both physical and mental health components in all countries. As hypothesized for orthogonal components, correlations between physical and mental components within each country were very low (0.00 to 0.12) for both estimation methods. Mean scores for PCS-36 differed by as much as 3.0 points across countries using standard scoring, and mean scores for MCS-36 differed across countries by as much as 6.4 points. In view of the high degree of equivalence observed within each country, using standard and country-specific algorithms, we recommend use of standard scoring algorithms for purposes of multinational studies involving these 10 countries.

AB - Data from general population surveys (n = 1771 to 9151) in nine European countries (Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom) were analyzed to test the algorithms used to score physical and mental component summary measures (PCS-36/MCS-36) based on the SF-36 Health Survey. Scoring coefficients for principal components were estimated independently in each country using identical methods of factor extraction and orthogonal rotation. PCS-36 and MCS-36 scores were also estimated using standard (U.S.-derived) scoring algorithms, and results were compared. Product-moment correlations between scores estimated from standard and country-specific scoring coefficients were very high (0.98 to 1.00) for both physical and mental health components in all countries. As hypothesized for orthogonal components, correlations between physical and mental components within each country were very low (0.00 to 0.12) for both estimation methods. Mean scores for PCS-36 differed by as much as 3.0 points across countries using standard scoring, and mean scores for MCS-36 differed across countries by as much as 6.4 points. In view of the high degree of equivalence observed within each country, using standard and country-specific algorithms, we recommend use of standard scoring algorithms for purposes of multinational studies involving these 10 countries.

KW - Construct validity

KW - Cross-cultural comparisons

KW - Factor analysis

KW - Health status indicators

KW - SF-36 Health Survey

KW - Translations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032212743&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032212743&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00108-5

DO - 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00108-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 9817134

AN - SCOPUS:0032212743

VL - 51

SP - 1167

EP - 1170

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 11

ER -