The European Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Survey: Comparison of outcomes between de novo cardiac resynchronization therapy implantations and upgrades

Nigussie Bogale, Klaus Witte, Silvia Priori, John Cleland, Angelo Auricchio, Fredrik Gadler, Anselm Gitt, Tobias Limbourg, Cecilia Linde, Kenneth Dickstein, Friedrich Fruhwald, Bernhard Strohmer, Marc Goethals, Johan Vijgen, Jean Noel Trochu, Daniel Gras, Michael Kindermann, Christoph Stellbrink, Ken McDonnald, David KeaneTuvia Ben Gal, Michael Glikson, Marco Metra, Maurizio Gasparini, Alexander Maass, Luc Jordaens, Marco Alings, Alf Inge Larsen, Svein Færestrand, Juan Delgado, Lluis Mont, Hans Persson, Hans Peter Brunner-La Rocca, Stefan Osswald, Ian Squire, John Morgan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aims Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective treatment for a subset of patients with chronic heart failure. Data on the benefit of CRT in heart failure patients with previous right ventricular pacemakers or standard defibrillators are sparse. Methods and resultsThe European (HFA, Heart Failure Association/EHRA, European Heart Rhythm Association) CRT Survey enrolled patients from 141 centres in 13 countries in Europe collecting baseline demographic, echocardiographic, clinical, and implant data, with follow-up at ∼1 year. The present analysis reports implantation data and 1 year outcomes regarding New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, global patient assessment, hospitalizations, complications, and mortality in patients undergoing de novo CRT implantations compared with those receiving an upgrade of a previously implanted device (pacemaker or implantable cardioverterdefibrillators). This analysis includes 2367 CRT implant procedures of which 692 (28) were upgrades to CRT. Distribution of NYHA functional class and left ventricular function were similar between the groups. Procedural duration was also similar, although fluoroscopy time was shorter in the 'upgrades'. There was no difference in the frequency of peri-procedural complications. There were similar improvements in NYHA functional class and similar reduction in QRS duration, but more patients reported unchanged global assessment status in the upgraded group. Total and cause-specific mortality at 1 year was low and the same in both groups. ConclusionsMore than one quarter of all CRT procedures are upgrades from existing systems, although this group has not been subject to randomized clinical trials. Our data suggest that there are no significant differences in clinical outcomes or complication rates between upgrades and de novo procedures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)974-983
Number of pages10
JournalEuropean Journal of Heart Failure
Volume13
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2011

Keywords

  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy
  • Heart failure
  • Pacemaker

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The European Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Survey: Comparison of outcomes between de novo cardiac resynchronization therapy implantations and upgrades'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Bogale, N., Witte, K., Priori, S., Cleland, J., Auricchio, A., Gadler, F., Gitt, A., Limbourg, T., Linde, C., Dickstein, K., Fruhwald, F., Strohmer, B., Goethals, M., Vijgen, J., Trochu, J. N., Gras, D., Kindermann, M., Stellbrink, C., McDonnald, K., ... Morgan, J. (2011). The European Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Survey: Comparison of outcomes between de novo cardiac resynchronization therapy implantations and upgrades. European Journal of Heart Failure, 13(9), 974-983. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjhf/hfr085