The European Thoracic Surgery Database project: Modelling the risk of in-hospital death following lung resection

Richard Berrisford, Alessandro Brunelli, Gaetano Rocco, Tom Treasure, Martin Utley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

126 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To identify pre-operative factors associated with in-hospital mortality following lung resection and to construct a risk model that could be used prospectively to inform decisions and retrospectively to enable fair comparisons of outcomes. Methods: Data were submitted to the European Thoracic Surgery Database from 27 units in 14 countries. We analysed data concerning all patients that had a lung resection. Logistic regression was used with a random sample of 60% of cases to identify pre-operative factors associated with in-hospital mortality and to build a model of risk. The resulting model was tested on the remaining 40% of patients. A second model based on age and ppoFEV1% was developed for risk of in-hospital death amongst tumour resection patients. Results: Of the 3426 adult patients that had a first lung resection for whom mortality data were available, 66 died within the same hospital admission. Within the data used for model development, dyspnoea (according to the Medical Research Council classification), ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) score, class of procedure and age were found to be significantly associated with in-hospital death in a multivariate analysis. The logistic model developed on these data displayed predictive value when tested on the remaining data. Conclusions: Two models of the risk of in-hospital death amongst adult patients undergoing lung resection have been developed. The models show predictive value and can be used to discern between high-risk and low-risk patients. Amongst the test data, the model developed for all diagnoses performed well at low risk, underestimated mortality at medium risk and overestimated mortality at high risk. The second model for resection of lung neoplasms was developed after establishing the performance of the first model and so could not be tested robustly. That said, we were encouraged by its performance over the entire range of estimated risk. The first of these two models could be regarded as an evaluation based on clinically available criteria while the second uses data obtained from objective measurement. We are optimistic that further model development and testing will provide a tool suitable for case mix adjustment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)306-311
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2005

Fingerprint

Thoracic Surgery
Databases
Lung
Hospital Mortality
Mortality
Logistic Models
Risk Adjustment
Dyspnea
Biomedical Research
Lung Neoplasms
Multivariate Analysis

Keywords

  • In-hospital mortality
  • Lung cancer
  • Lung resection
  • Risk modelling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

The European Thoracic Surgery Database project : Modelling the risk of in-hospital death following lung resection. / Berrisford, Richard; Brunelli, Alessandro; Rocco, Gaetano; Treasure, Tom; Utley, Martin.

In: European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, Vol. 28, No. 2, 08.2005, p. 306-311.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Berrisford, Richard ; Brunelli, Alessandro ; Rocco, Gaetano ; Treasure, Tom ; Utley, Martin. / The European Thoracic Surgery Database project : Modelling the risk of in-hospital death following lung resection. In: European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2005 ; Vol. 28, No. 2. pp. 306-311.
@article{f83988de4dcb44a19a16e518c75df2e5,
title = "The European Thoracic Surgery Database project: Modelling the risk of in-hospital death following lung resection",
abstract = "Objective: To identify pre-operative factors associated with in-hospital mortality following lung resection and to construct a risk model that could be used prospectively to inform decisions and retrospectively to enable fair comparisons of outcomes. Methods: Data were submitted to the European Thoracic Surgery Database from 27 units in 14 countries. We analysed data concerning all patients that had a lung resection. Logistic regression was used with a random sample of 60{\%} of cases to identify pre-operative factors associated with in-hospital mortality and to build a model of risk. The resulting model was tested on the remaining 40{\%} of patients. A second model based on age and ppoFEV1{\%} was developed for risk of in-hospital death amongst tumour resection patients. Results: Of the 3426 adult patients that had a first lung resection for whom mortality data were available, 66 died within the same hospital admission. Within the data used for model development, dyspnoea (according to the Medical Research Council classification), ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) score, class of procedure and age were found to be significantly associated with in-hospital death in a multivariate analysis. The logistic model developed on these data displayed predictive value when tested on the remaining data. Conclusions: Two models of the risk of in-hospital death amongst adult patients undergoing lung resection have been developed. The models show predictive value and can be used to discern between high-risk and low-risk patients. Amongst the test data, the model developed for all diagnoses performed well at low risk, underestimated mortality at medium risk and overestimated mortality at high risk. The second model for resection of lung neoplasms was developed after establishing the performance of the first model and so could not be tested robustly. That said, we were encouraged by its performance over the entire range of estimated risk. The first of these two models could be regarded as an evaluation based on clinically available criteria while the second uses data obtained from objective measurement. We are optimistic that further model development and testing will provide a tool suitable for case mix adjustment.",
keywords = "In-hospital mortality, Lung cancer, Lung resection, Risk modelling",
author = "Richard Berrisford and Alessandro Brunelli and Gaetano Rocco and Tom Treasure and Martin Utley",
year = "2005",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.03.047",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "306--311",
journal = "European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery",
issn = "1010-7940",
publisher = "European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The European Thoracic Surgery Database project

T2 - Modelling the risk of in-hospital death following lung resection

AU - Berrisford, Richard

AU - Brunelli, Alessandro

AU - Rocco, Gaetano

AU - Treasure, Tom

AU - Utley, Martin

PY - 2005/8

Y1 - 2005/8

N2 - Objective: To identify pre-operative factors associated with in-hospital mortality following lung resection and to construct a risk model that could be used prospectively to inform decisions and retrospectively to enable fair comparisons of outcomes. Methods: Data were submitted to the European Thoracic Surgery Database from 27 units in 14 countries. We analysed data concerning all patients that had a lung resection. Logistic regression was used with a random sample of 60% of cases to identify pre-operative factors associated with in-hospital mortality and to build a model of risk. The resulting model was tested on the remaining 40% of patients. A second model based on age and ppoFEV1% was developed for risk of in-hospital death amongst tumour resection patients. Results: Of the 3426 adult patients that had a first lung resection for whom mortality data were available, 66 died within the same hospital admission. Within the data used for model development, dyspnoea (according to the Medical Research Council classification), ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) score, class of procedure and age were found to be significantly associated with in-hospital death in a multivariate analysis. The logistic model developed on these data displayed predictive value when tested on the remaining data. Conclusions: Two models of the risk of in-hospital death amongst adult patients undergoing lung resection have been developed. The models show predictive value and can be used to discern between high-risk and low-risk patients. Amongst the test data, the model developed for all diagnoses performed well at low risk, underestimated mortality at medium risk and overestimated mortality at high risk. The second model for resection of lung neoplasms was developed after establishing the performance of the first model and so could not be tested robustly. That said, we were encouraged by its performance over the entire range of estimated risk. The first of these two models could be regarded as an evaluation based on clinically available criteria while the second uses data obtained from objective measurement. We are optimistic that further model development and testing will provide a tool suitable for case mix adjustment.

AB - Objective: To identify pre-operative factors associated with in-hospital mortality following lung resection and to construct a risk model that could be used prospectively to inform decisions and retrospectively to enable fair comparisons of outcomes. Methods: Data were submitted to the European Thoracic Surgery Database from 27 units in 14 countries. We analysed data concerning all patients that had a lung resection. Logistic regression was used with a random sample of 60% of cases to identify pre-operative factors associated with in-hospital mortality and to build a model of risk. The resulting model was tested on the remaining 40% of patients. A second model based on age and ppoFEV1% was developed for risk of in-hospital death amongst tumour resection patients. Results: Of the 3426 adult patients that had a first lung resection for whom mortality data were available, 66 died within the same hospital admission. Within the data used for model development, dyspnoea (according to the Medical Research Council classification), ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) score, class of procedure and age were found to be significantly associated with in-hospital death in a multivariate analysis. The logistic model developed on these data displayed predictive value when tested on the remaining data. Conclusions: Two models of the risk of in-hospital death amongst adult patients undergoing lung resection have been developed. The models show predictive value and can be used to discern between high-risk and low-risk patients. Amongst the test data, the model developed for all diagnoses performed well at low risk, underestimated mortality at medium risk and overestimated mortality at high risk. The second model for resection of lung neoplasms was developed after establishing the performance of the first model and so could not be tested robustly. That said, we were encouraged by its performance over the entire range of estimated risk. The first of these two models could be regarded as an evaluation based on clinically available criteria while the second uses data obtained from objective measurement. We are optimistic that further model development and testing will provide a tool suitable for case mix adjustment.

KW - In-hospital mortality

KW - Lung cancer

KW - Lung resection

KW - Risk modelling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=22544470021&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=22544470021&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.03.047

DO - 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.03.047

M3 - Article

C2 - 16144067

AN - SCOPUS:22544470021

VL - 28

SP - 306

EP - 311

JO - European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery

JF - European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery

SN - 1010-7940

IS - 2

ER -