The format of mental imagery

from a critical review to an integrated embodied representation approach

Massimiliano Palmiero, Laura Piccardi, Marco Giancola, Raffaella Nori, Simonetta D’Amico, Marta Olivetti Belardinelli

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The issue of the format of mental imagery is still an open debate. The classical analogue (depictive)–propositional (descriptive) debate has not provided definitive conclusions. Over the years, the debate has shifted within the frame of the embodied cognition approach, which focuses on the interdependence of perception, cognition and action. Although the simulation approach still retains the concept of representation, the more radical line of the embodied cognition approach emphasizes the importance of action and clearly disregards the concept of representation. In particular, the enactive approach focuses on motor procedures that allow the body to interact with the environment, whereas the sensorimotor approach focuses on the possession and exercise of sensorimotor knowledge about how the sensory input changes as a function of movement. In this review, the embodied approaches are presented and critically discussed. Then, in an attempt to show that the format of mental imagery varies according to the ability and the strategy used to represent information, the role of individual differences in imagery ability (e.g., vividness and expertise) and imagery strategy (e.g., object vs. spatial imagers) is reviewed. Since vividness is mainly associated with perceptual information, reflecting the activation level of specific imagery systems, whereas the preferred strategy used is mainly associated with perceptual (e.g., object imagery) or amodal and motor information (e.g., spatial imagery), the format of mental imagery appears to be based on dynamic embodied representations, depending on imagery abilities and imagery strategies.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCognitive Processing
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Imagery (Psychotherapy)
Image sensors
Chemical activation
Aptitude
Cognition
Individuality

Keywords

  • Dynamic
  • Embodied cognition
  • Imagery
  • Motor
  • Neuroimaging
  • Neuropsychology
  • Perception
  • Semantic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Artificial Intelligence

Cite this

The format of mental imagery : from a critical review to an integrated embodied representation approach. / Palmiero, Massimiliano; Piccardi, Laura; Giancola, Marco; Nori, Raffaella; D’Amico, Simonetta; Olivetti Belardinelli, Marta.

In: Cognitive Processing, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Palmiero, Massimiliano ; Piccardi, Laura ; Giancola, Marco ; Nori, Raffaella ; D’Amico, Simonetta ; Olivetti Belardinelli, Marta. / The format of mental imagery : from a critical review to an integrated embodied representation approach. In: Cognitive Processing. 2019.
@article{60725c55541746f3a9026c86b09cd6db,
title = "The format of mental imagery: from a critical review to an integrated embodied representation approach",
abstract = "The issue of the format of mental imagery is still an open debate. The classical analogue (depictive)–propositional (descriptive) debate has not provided definitive conclusions. Over the years, the debate has shifted within the frame of the embodied cognition approach, which focuses on the interdependence of perception, cognition and action. Although the simulation approach still retains the concept of representation, the more radical line of the embodied cognition approach emphasizes the importance of action and clearly disregards the concept of representation. In particular, the enactive approach focuses on motor procedures that allow the body to interact with the environment, whereas the sensorimotor approach focuses on the possession and exercise of sensorimotor knowledge about how the sensory input changes as a function of movement. In this review, the embodied approaches are presented and critically discussed. Then, in an attempt to show that the format of mental imagery varies according to the ability and the strategy used to represent information, the role of individual differences in imagery ability (e.g., vividness and expertise) and imagery strategy (e.g., object vs. spatial imagers) is reviewed. Since vividness is mainly associated with perceptual information, reflecting the activation level of specific imagery systems, whereas the preferred strategy used is mainly associated with perceptual (e.g., object imagery) or amodal and motor information (e.g., spatial imagery), the format of mental imagery appears to be based on dynamic embodied representations, depending on imagery abilities and imagery strategies.",
keywords = "Dynamic, Embodied cognition, Imagery, Motor, Neuroimaging, Neuropsychology, Perception, Semantic",
author = "Massimiliano Palmiero and Laura Piccardi and Marco Giancola and Raffaella Nori and Simonetta D’Amico and {Olivetti Belardinelli}, Marta",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10339-019-00908-z",
language = "English",
journal = "Cognitive Processing",
issn = "1612-4782",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The format of mental imagery

T2 - from a critical review to an integrated embodied representation approach

AU - Palmiero, Massimiliano

AU - Piccardi, Laura

AU - Giancola, Marco

AU - Nori, Raffaella

AU - D’Amico, Simonetta

AU - Olivetti Belardinelli, Marta

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - The issue of the format of mental imagery is still an open debate. The classical analogue (depictive)–propositional (descriptive) debate has not provided definitive conclusions. Over the years, the debate has shifted within the frame of the embodied cognition approach, which focuses on the interdependence of perception, cognition and action. Although the simulation approach still retains the concept of representation, the more radical line of the embodied cognition approach emphasizes the importance of action and clearly disregards the concept of representation. In particular, the enactive approach focuses on motor procedures that allow the body to interact with the environment, whereas the sensorimotor approach focuses on the possession and exercise of sensorimotor knowledge about how the sensory input changes as a function of movement. In this review, the embodied approaches are presented and critically discussed. Then, in an attempt to show that the format of mental imagery varies according to the ability and the strategy used to represent information, the role of individual differences in imagery ability (e.g., vividness and expertise) and imagery strategy (e.g., object vs. spatial imagers) is reviewed. Since vividness is mainly associated with perceptual information, reflecting the activation level of specific imagery systems, whereas the preferred strategy used is mainly associated with perceptual (e.g., object imagery) or amodal and motor information (e.g., spatial imagery), the format of mental imagery appears to be based on dynamic embodied representations, depending on imagery abilities and imagery strategies.

AB - The issue of the format of mental imagery is still an open debate. The classical analogue (depictive)–propositional (descriptive) debate has not provided definitive conclusions. Over the years, the debate has shifted within the frame of the embodied cognition approach, which focuses on the interdependence of perception, cognition and action. Although the simulation approach still retains the concept of representation, the more radical line of the embodied cognition approach emphasizes the importance of action and clearly disregards the concept of representation. In particular, the enactive approach focuses on motor procedures that allow the body to interact with the environment, whereas the sensorimotor approach focuses on the possession and exercise of sensorimotor knowledge about how the sensory input changes as a function of movement. In this review, the embodied approaches are presented and critically discussed. Then, in an attempt to show that the format of mental imagery varies according to the ability and the strategy used to represent information, the role of individual differences in imagery ability (e.g., vividness and expertise) and imagery strategy (e.g., object vs. spatial imagers) is reviewed. Since vividness is mainly associated with perceptual information, reflecting the activation level of specific imagery systems, whereas the preferred strategy used is mainly associated with perceptual (e.g., object imagery) or amodal and motor information (e.g., spatial imagery), the format of mental imagery appears to be based on dynamic embodied representations, depending on imagery abilities and imagery strategies.

KW - Dynamic

KW - Embodied cognition

KW - Imagery

KW - Motor

KW - Neuroimaging

KW - Neuropsychology

KW - Perception

KW - Semantic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062019889&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062019889&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10339-019-00908-z

DO - 10.1007/s10339-019-00908-z

M3 - Review article

JO - Cognitive Processing

JF - Cognitive Processing

SN - 1612-4782

ER -