The impact of meta-analyses on clinical practice: The benefits

Alberto Morganti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Meta-analyses are frequently criticized because in most cases they are compiled from quite heterogeneous studies. In spite of this limitation meta-analyses are increasingly published because in many areas of clinical research the results of individual studies are devoid of statistical power and end up with conflicting results. Meta-analyses, if performed with a rigorous and exhaustive search of all accountable information on a specific topic, have the potential of overcoming the drawbacks of single studies and, in addition, of adjusting for publication bias and interstudy variability. These strengths of meta-analyses can be exploited to provide conclusive answers on diagnostic and therapeutic issues being debated, which in turn may help guide doctors toward more rational decisions.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Nephrology
Volume20
Issue numberSUPPL. 12
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2007

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Publication Bias
Research
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Benefits
  • Clinical trial
  • Hypertension
  • Meta-analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology

Cite this

The impact of meta-analyses on clinical practice : The benefits. / Morganti, Alberto.

In: Journal of Nephrology, Vol. 20, No. SUPPL. 12, 11.2007.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Morganti, Alberto. / The impact of meta-analyses on clinical practice : The benefits. In: Journal of Nephrology. 2007 ; Vol. 20, No. SUPPL. 12.
@article{b9c916a3ecb54001962066b30bd70d52,
title = "The impact of meta-analyses on clinical practice: The benefits",
abstract = "Meta-analyses are frequently criticized because in most cases they are compiled from quite heterogeneous studies. In spite of this limitation meta-analyses are increasingly published because in many areas of clinical research the results of individual studies are devoid of statistical power and end up with conflicting results. Meta-analyses, if performed with a rigorous and exhaustive search of all accountable information on a specific topic, have the potential of overcoming the drawbacks of single studies and, in addition, of adjusting for publication bias and interstudy variability. These strengths of meta-analyses can be exploited to provide conclusive answers on diagnostic and therapeutic issues being debated, which in turn may help guide doctors toward more rational decisions.",
keywords = "Benefits, Clinical trial, Hypertension, Meta-analysis",
author = "Alberto Morganti",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
journal = "Journal of Nephrology",
issn = "1121-8428",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing",
number = "SUPPL. 12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of meta-analyses on clinical practice

T2 - The benefits

AU - Morganti, Alberto

PY - 2007/11

Y1 - 2007/11

N2 - Meta-analyses are frequently criticized because in most cases they are compiled from quite heterogeneous studies. In spite of this limitation meta-analyses are increasingly published because in many areas of clinical research the results of individual studies are devoid of statistical power and end up with conflicting results. Meta-analyses, if performed with a rigorous and exhaustive search of all accountable information on a specific topic, have the potential of overcoming the drawbacks of single studies and, in addition, of adjusting for publication bias and interstudy variability. These strengths of meta-analyses can be exploited to provide conclusive answers on diagnostic and therapeutic issues being debated, which in turn may help guide doctors toward more rational decisions.

AB - Meta-analyses are frequently criticized because in most cases they are compiled from quite heterogeneous studies. In spite of this limitation meta-analyses are increasingly published because in many areas of clinical research the results of individual studies are devoid of statistical power and end up with conflicting results. Meta-analyses, if performed with a rigorous and exhaustive search of all accountable information on a specific topic, have the potential of overcoming the drawbacks of single studies and, in addition, of adjusting for publication bias and interstudy variability. These strengths of meta-analyses can be exploited to provide conclusive answers on diagnostic and therapeutic issues being debated, which in turn may help guide doctors toward more rational decisions.

KW - Benefits

KW - Clinical trial

KW - Hypertension

KW - Meta-analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39449083244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=39449083244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 18050136

AN - SCOPUS:39449083244

VL - 20

JO - Journal of Nephrology

JF - Journal of Nephrology

SN - 1121-8428

IS - SUPPL. 12

ER -