The intraoperative staging systems in the management of peritoneal surface malignancy

A. Gomez Portilla; Kusamura Shigeki; Baratti Dario; Deraco Marcello

doi:10.1002/jso.21068

The intraoperative staging systems in the management of peritoneal surface malignancy

A. Gomez Portilla, Kusamura Shigeki, Baratti Dario, Deraco Marcello

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The establishment of a rationale guideline for intraoperative staging system the extent of carcinomatosis is warranted. The quantitation of tumor found at the time of surgical exploration of the abdomen has proven to be of value in assessment of prognosis and treatment planning in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Four different assessments systems have been employed more frequently, thus far. The advantages and disadvantages of each classification systems are described and discussed. The results of the Consensus of the last 5th International Workshop on Peritoneal Surface malignancy of Milan, December 2006 are presented.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	228-231
Number of pages	4
Journal	Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume	98
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.21068
Publication status	Published - Sep 15 2008

Keywords

Peritoneal cancer index
Peritoneal carcinomatosis
Peritoneal surface malignancy
Staging systems

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Surgery
Oncology

Access to Document

10.1002/jso.21068

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The intraoperative staging systems in the management of peritoneal surface malignancy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{3eea20e9c10a4088a2a0c70fd499efcf,

title = "The intraoperative staging systems in the management of peritoneal surface malignancy",

abstract = "The establishment of a rationale guideline for intraoperative staging system the extent of carcinomatosis is warranted. The quantitation of tumor found at the time of surgical exploration of the abdomen has proven to be of value in assessment of prognosis and treatment planning in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Four different assessments systems have been employed more frequently, thus far. The advantages and disadvantages of each classification systems are described and discussed. The results of the Consensus of the last 5th International Workshop on Peritoneal Surface malignancy of Milan, December 2006 are presented.",

keywords = "Peritoneal cancer index, Peritoneal carcinomatosis, Peritoneal surface malignancy, Staging systems",

author = "Portilla, {A. Gomez} and Kusamura Shigeki and Baratti Dario and Deraco Marcello",

year = "2008",

month = sep,

day = "15",

doi = "10.1002/jso.21068",

language = "English",

volume = "98",

pages = "228--231",

journal = "Journal of Surgical Oncology",

issn = "0022-4790",

publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The intraoperative staging systems in the management of peritoneal surface malignancy

AU - Portilla, A. Gomez

AU - Shigeki, Kusamura

AU - Dario, Baratti

AU - Marcello, Deraco

PY - 2008/9/15

Y1 - 2008/9/15

N2 - The establishment of a rationale guideline for intraoperative staging system the extent of carcinomatosis is warranted. The quantitation of tumor found at the time of surgical exploration of the abdomen has proven to be of value in assessment of prognosis and treatment planning in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Four different assessments systems have been employed more frequently, thus far. The advantages and disadvantages of each classification systems are described and discussed. The results of the Consensus of the last 5th International Workshop on Peritoneal Surface malignancy of Milan, December 2006 are presented.

AB - The establishment of a rationale guideline for intraoperative staging system the extent of carcinomatosis is warranted. The quantitation of tumor found at the time of surgical exploration of the abdomen has proven to be of value in assessment of prognosis and treatment planning in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Four different assessments systems have been employed more frequently, thus far. The advantages and disadvantages of each classification systems are described and discussed. The results of the Consensus of the last 5th International Workshop on Peritoneal Surface malignancy of Milan, December 2006 are presented.

KW - Peritoneal cancer index

KW - Peritoneal carcinomatosis

KW - Peritoneal surface malignancy

KW - Staging systems

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=50849103065&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=50849103065&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jso.21068

DO - 10.1002/jso.21068

M3 - Article

C2 - 18726882

AN - SCOPUS:50849103065

VL - 98

SP - 228

EP - 231

JO - Journal of Surgical Oncology

JF - Journal of Surgical Oncology

SN - 0022-4790

IS - 4

ER -

The intraoperative staging systems in the management of peritoneal surface malignancy

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this