The learning curve in myopic photorefractive keratectomy

A. Tavola, F. Carones, L. Galli, G. Fontanella, R. Brancato

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the role of surgeons' skill on the final results of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in the correction of myopia. METHODS: We evaluated the results of 160 consecutive unilateral treatments performed by four surgeons in a multicenter study group, with a one year follow up. Eighty-eight patients were males (55%) and 72 females (45%). Mean age was 33.7 years (median = 33, standard deviation = 10.22, range 18-65). Attempted correction ranged between -1.50 and -15.00 D. All the eyes received topical corticosteroid therapy postoperatively. At the one year follow up, we evaluated the following: uncorrected visual acuity lines gained and refractive error (spherical equivalent) as parameters of efficacy and predictability; best spectacle corrected visual acuity loss and corneal clarity as safety parameters. We also examined the centration or decentration of the ablation zone. In order to draw up a kind of learning curve, the mean values for each parameter were calculated by arbitrarily grouping the first 10 cases of each surgeon in the first group (40 patients), the second 10 cases in the second group (40 patients) and so on. RESULTS: We found that increase in uncorrected visual acuity, final refractive error and corneal clarity appeared to improve as the surgeon became more experienced, while loss of best spectacle corrected visual acuity was not significantly influenced by increased surgical experience. CONCLUSIONS: We think experience with photorefractive keratectomy in at least 40 eyes is necessary to obtain best results.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Refractive and Corneal Surgery
Volume10
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1994

Fingerprint

Photorefractive Keratectomy
Learning Curve
Visual Acuity
Refractive Errors
Myopia
Multicenter Studies
Adrenal Cortex Hormones
Safety
Surgeons
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Tavola, A., Carones, F., Galli, L., Fontanella, G., & Brancato, R. (1994). The learning curve in myopic photorefractive keratectomy. Journal of Refractive and Corneal Surgery, 10(2).

The learning curve in myopic photorefractive keratectomy. / Tavola, A.; Carones, F.; Galli, L.; Fontanella, G.; Brancato, R.

In: Journal of Refractive and Corneal Surgery, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1994.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tavola, A, Carones, F, Galli, L, Fontanella, G & Brancato, R 1994, 'The learning curve in myopic photorefractive keratectomy', Journal of Refractive and Corneal Surgery, vol. 10, no. 2.
Tavola, A. ; Carones, F. ; Galli, L. ; Fontanella, G. ; Brancato, R. / The learning curve in myopic photorefractive keratectomy. In: Journal of Refractive and Corneal Surgery. 1994 ; Vol. 10, No. 2.
@article{5bc6c82d5a434aabb1a8ccb10beb81da,
title = "The learning curve in myopic photorefractive keratectomy",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the role of surgeons' skill on the final results of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in the correction of myopia. METHODS: We evaluated the results of 160 consecutive unilateral treatments performed by four surgeons in a multicenter study group, with a one year follow up. Eighty-eight patients were males (55{\%}) and 72 females (45{\%}). Mean age was 33.7 years (median = 33, standard deviation = 10.22, range 18-65). Attempted correction ranged between -1.50 and -15.00 D. All the eyes received topical corticosteroid therapy postoperatively. At the one year follow up, we evaluated the following: uncorrected visual acuity lines gained and refractive error (spherical equivalent) as parameters of efficacy and predictability; best spectacle corrected visual acuity loss and corneal clarity as safety parameters. We also examined the centration or decentration of the ablation zone. In order to draw up a kind of learning curve, the mean values for each parameter were calculated by arbitrarily grouping the first 10 cases of each surgeon in the first group (40 patients), the second 10 cases in the second group (40 patients) and so on. RESULTS: We found that increase in uncorrected visual acuity, final refractive error and corneal clarity appeared to improve as the surgeon became more experienced, while loss of best spectacle corrected visual acuity was not significantly influenced by increased surgical experience. CONCLUSIONS: We think experience with photorefractive keratectomy in at least 40 eyes is necessary to obtain best results.",
author = "A. Tavola and F. Carones and L. Galli and G. Fontanella and R. Brancato",
year = "1994",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "Journal of Refractive Surgery",
issn = "1081-597X",
publisher = "Slack Incorporated",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The learning curve in myopic photorefractive keratectomy

AU - Tavola, A.

AU - Carones, F.

AU - Galli, L.

AU - Fontanella, G.

AU - Brancato, R.

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the role of surgeons' skill on the final results of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in the correction of myopia. METHODS: We evaluated the results of 160 consecutive unilateral treatments performed by four surgeons in a multicenter study group, with a one year follow up. Eighty-eight patients were males (55%) and 72 females (45%). Mean age was 33.7 years (median = 33, standard deviation = 10.22, range 18-65). Attempted correction ranged between -1.50 and -15.00 D. All the eyes received topical corticosteroid therapy postoperatively. At the one year follow up, we evaluated the following: uncorrected visual acuity lines gained and refractive error (spherical equivalent) as parameters of efficacy and predictability; best spectacle corrected visual acuity loss and corneal clarity as safety parameters. We also examined the centration or decentration of the ablation zone. In order to draw up a kind of learning curve, the mean values for each parameter were calculated by arbitrarily grouping the first 10 cases of each surgeon in the first group (40 patients), the second 10 cases in the second group (40 patients) and so on. RESULTS: We found that increase in uncorrected visual acuity, final refractive error and corneal clarity appeared to improve as the surgeon became more experienced, while loss of best spectacle corrected visual acuity was not significantly influenced by increased surgical experience. CONCLUSIONS: We think experience with photorefractive keratectomy in at least 40 eyes is necessary to obtain best results.

AB - BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the role of surgeons' skill on the final results of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in the correction of myopia. METHODS: We evaluated the results of 160 consecutive unilateral treatments performed by four surgeons in a multicenter study group, with a one year follow up. Eighty-eight patients were males (55%) and 72 females (45%). Mean age was 33.7 years (median = 33, standard deviation = 10.22, range 18-65). Attempted correction ranged between -1.50 and -15.00 D. All the eyes received topical corticosteroid therapy postoperatively. At the one year follow up, we evaluated the following: uncorrected visual acuity lines gained and refractive error (spherical equivalent) as parameters of efficacy and predictability; best spectacle corrected visual acuity loss and corneal clarity as safety parameters. We also examined the centration or decentration of the ablation zone. In order to draw up a kind of learning curve, the mean values for each parameter were calculated by arbitrarily grouping the first 10 cases of each surgeon in the first group (40 patients), the second 10 cases in the second group (40 patients) and so on. RESULTS: We found that increase in uncorrected visual acuity, final refractive error and corneal clarity appeared to improve as the surgeon became more experienced, while loss of best spectacle corrected visual acuity was not significantly influenced by increased surgical experience. CONCLUSIONS: We think experience with photorefractive keratectomy in at least 40 eyes is necessary to obtain best results.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028307382&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028307382&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 10

JO - Journal of Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Refractive Surgery

SN - 1081-597X

IS - 2

ER -