The Mental Representation of Numerical Fractions

Real or Integer?

Mario Bonato, Sara Fabbri, Carlo Umiltà, Marco Zorzi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

109 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Numerical fractions are commonly used to express ratios and proportions (i.e., real numbers), but little is known about how they are mentally represented and processed by skilled adults. Four experiments employed comparison tasks to investigate the distance effect and the effect of the spatial numerical association of response codes (SNARC) for fractions. Results showed that fractions were processed componentially and that the real numerical value of the fraction was not accessed, indicating that processing the fraction's magnitude is not automatic. In contrast, responses were influenced by the numerical magnitude of the components and reflected the simple comparison between numerators, denominators, and reference, depending on the strategy adopted. Strategies were used even by highly skilled participants and were flexibly adapted to the specific experimental context. In line with results on the whole number bias in children, these findings suggest that the understanding of fractions is rooted in the ability to represent discrete numerosities (i.e., integers) rather than real numbers and that the well-known difficulties of children in mastering fractions are circumvented by skilled adults through a flexible use of strategies based on the integer components.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1410-1419
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Volume33
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2007

Fingerprint

Mental Representation
Experiment
Proportion
Numerosity

Keywords

  • distance effect
  • fractions
  • magnitude representation
  • SNARC effect
  • whole number bias

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

The Mental Representation of Numerical Fractions : Real or Integer? / Bonato, Mario; Fabbri, Sara; Umiltà, Carlo; Zorzi, Marco.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 33, No. 6, 12.2007, p. 1410-1419.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bonato, Mario ; Fabbri, Sara ; Umiltà, Carlo ; Zorzi, Marco. / The Mental Representation of Numerical Fractions : Real or Integer?. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2007 ; Vol. 33, No. 6. pp. 1410-1419.
@article{11fcb8e67de94a3791ab6c0d5f19853b,
title = "The Mental Representation of Numerical Fractions: Real or Integer?",
abstract = "Numerical fractions are commonly used to express ratios and proportions (i.e., real numbers), but little is known about how they are mentally represented and processed by skilled adults. Four experiments employed comparison tasks to investigate the distance effect and the effect of the spatial numerical association of response codes (SNARC) for fractions. Results showed that fractions were processed componentially and that the real numerical value of the fraction was not accessed, indicating that processing the fraction's magnitude is not automatic. In contrast, responses were influenced by the numerical magnitude of the components and reflected the simple comparison between numerators, denominators, and reference, depending on the strategy adopted. Strategies were used even by highly skilled participants and were flexibly adapted to the specific experimental context. In line with results on the whole number bias in children, these findings suggest that the understanding of fractions is rooted in the ability to represent discrete numerosities (i.e., integers) rather than real numbers and that the well-known difficulties of children in mastering fractions are circumvented by skilled adults through a flexible use of strategies based on the integer components.",
keywords = "distance effect, fractions, magnitude representation, SNARC effect, whole number bias",
author = "Mario Bonato and Sara Fabbri and Carlo Umilt{\`a} and Marco Zorzi",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1410",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "1410--1419",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance",
issn = "0096-1523",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Mental Representation of Numerical Fractions

T2 - Real or Integer?

AU - Bonato, Mario

AU - Fabbri, Sara

AU - Umiltà, Carlo

AU - Zorzi, Marco

PY - 2007/12

Y1 - 2007/12

N2 - Numerical fractions are commonly used to express ratios and proportions (i.e., real numbers), but little is known about how they are mentally represented and processed by skilled adults. Four experiments employed comparison tasks to investigate the distance effect and the effect of the spatial numerical association of response codes (SNARC) for fractions. Results showed that fractions were processed componentially and that the real numerical value of the fraction was not accessed, indicating that processing the fraction's magnitude is not automatic. In contrast, responses were influenced by the numerical magnitude of the components and reflected the simple comparison between numerators, denominators, and reference, depending on the strategy adopted. Strategies were used even by highly skilled participants and were flexibly adapted to the specific experimental context. In line with results on the whole number bias in children, these findings suggest that the understanding of fractions is rooted in the ability to represent discrete numerosities (i.e., integers) rather than real numbers and that the well-known difficulties of children in mastering fractions are circumvented by skilled adults through a flexible use of strategies based on the integer components.

AB - Numerical fractions are commonly used to express ratios and proportions (i.e., real numbers), but little is known about how they are mentally represented and processed by skilled adults. Four experiments employed comparison tasks to investigate the distance effect and the effect of the spatial numerical association of response codes (SNARC) for fractions. Results showed that fractions were processed componentially and that the real numerical value of the fraction was not accessed, indicating that processing the fraction's magnitude is not automatic. In contrast, responses were influenced by the numerical magnitude of the components and reflected the simple comparison between numerators, denominators, and reference, depending on the strategy adopted. Strategies were used even by highly skilled participants and were flexibly adapted to the specific experimental context. In line with results on the whole number bias in children, these findings suggest that the understanding of fractions is rooted in the ability to represent discrete numerosities (i.e., integers) rather than real numbers and that the well-known difficulties of children in mastering fractions are circumvented by skilled adults through a flexible use of strategies based on the integer components.

KW - distance effect

KW - fractions

KW - magnitude representation

KW - SNARC effect

KW - whole number bias

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38349120491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38349120491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1410

DO - 10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1410

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 1410

EP - 1419

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

SN - 0096-1523

IS - 6

ER -