The Natural History of Idiopathic Scoliosis during Growth: A Meta-Analysis

Francesca Di Felice, Fabio Zaina, Sabrina Donzelli, Stefano Negrini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective The aim of the study was to provide a meta-analysis of current literature concerning the natural history of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Design A comprehensive search of Medline, Embase, And Scopus databases was conducted up to November 2016. Eligible works were prospective or retrospective studies that enrolled patients with infantile idiopathic scoliosis, juvenile idiopathic scoliosis, or adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, followed up without any treatment from the time of detection. A meta-analysis for proportion was performed. The following studies were grouped per diagnosis: infantile idiopathic scoliosis, juvenile idiopathic scoliosis, and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Results Of the 1797 citations screened, we assessed 61 full-text articles and included 13 of these (2301 participants). Three studies included infantile idiopathic scoliosis patients (347 participants), five studies included a mixed population of juvenile idiopathic scoliosis and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (1330 participants), and five studies included adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients only (624 participants). The random pooled estimated progression rate was 49% (95% confidence interval = 1%-97%) for infantile idiopathic scoliosis, 49% in a mixed group of patients affected by juvenile idiopathic scoliosis or adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (95% confidence interval = 19%-79%), and 42% in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (95% confidence interval = 11%-73%). Conclusions During growth, idiopathic scoliosis tends to progress in a high percentage of cases. The progression rate varies according to the age at diagnosis, with infantile scoliosis being the most unpredictable. There are many confounders, such as age, Risser sign and baseline Cobb angles that were not consistent among studies, making the data very heterogeneous.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)346-356
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume97
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 1 2018

Fingerprint

Scoliosis
Meta-Analysis
Growth
Confidence Intervals

Keywords

  • Growth
  • Idiopathic Scoliosis
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Natural History

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

The Natural History of Idiopathic Scoliosis during Growth : A Meta-Analysis. / Di Felice, Francesca; Zaina, Fabio; Donzelli, Sabrina; Negrini, Stefano.

In: American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 97, No. 5, 01.05.2018, p. 346-356.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Di Felice, Francesca ; Zaina, Fabio ; Donzelli, Sabrina ; Negrini, Stefano. / The Natural History of Idiopathic Scoliosis during Growth : A Meta-Analysis. In: American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2018 ; Vol. 97, No. 5. pp. 346-356.
@article{e081694fa41046b5be42664358a5f1d7,
title = "The Natural History of Idiopathic Scoliosis during Growth: A Meta-Analysis",
abstract = "Objective The aim of the study was to provide a meta-analysis of current literature concerning the natural history of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Design A comprehensive search of Medline, Embase, And Scopus databases was conducted up to November 2016. Eligible works were prospective or retrospective studies that enrolled patients with infantile idiopathic scoliosis, juvenile idiopathic scoliosis, or adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, followed up without any treatment from the time of detection. A meta-analysis for proportion was performed. The following studies were grouped per diagnosis: infantile idiopathic scoliosis, juvenile idiopathic scoliosis, and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Results Of the 1797 citations screened, we assessed 61 full-text articles and included 13 of these (2301 participants). Three studies included infantile idiopathic scoliosis patients (347 participants), five studies included a mixed population of juvenile idiopathic scoliosis and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (1330 participants), and five studies included adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients only (624 participants). The random pooled estimated progression rate was 49{\%} (95{\%} confidence interval = 1{\%}-97{\%}) for infantile idiopathic scoliosis, 49{\%} in a mixed group of patients affected by juvenile idiopathic scoliosis or adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (95{\%} confidence interval = 19{\%}-79{\%}), and 42{\%} in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (95{\%} confidence interval = 11{\%}-73{\%}). Conclusions During growth, idiopathic scoliosis tends to progress in a high percentage of cases. The progression rate varies according to the age at diagnosis, with infantile scoliosis being the most unpredictable. There are many confounders, such as age, Risser sign and baseline Cobb angles that were not consistent among studies, making the data very heterogeneous.",
keywords = "Growth, Idiopathic Scoliosis, Meta-Analysis, Natural History",
author = "{Di Felice}, Francesca and Fabio Zaina and Sabrina Donzelli and Stefano Negrini",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PHM.0000000000000861",
language = "English",
volume = "97",
pages = "346--356",
journal = "American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0894-9115",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Natural History of Idiopathic Scoliosis during Growth

T2 - A Meta-Analysis

AU - Di Felice, Francesca

AU - Zaina, Fabio

AU - Donzelli, Sabrina

AU - Negrini, Stefano

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Objective The aim of the study was to provide a meta-analysis of current literature concerning the natural history of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Design A comprehensive search of Medline, Embase, And Scopus databases was conducted up to November 2016. Eligible works were prospective or retrospective studies that enrolled patients with infantile idiopathic scoliosis, juvenile idiopathic scoliosis, or adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, followed up without any treatment from the time of detection. A meta-analysis for proportion was performed. The following studies were grouped per diagnosis: infantile idiopathic scoliosis, juvenile idiopathic scoliosis, and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Results Of the 1797 citations screened, we assessed 61 full-text articles and included 13 of these (2301 participants). Three studies included infantile idiopathic scoliosis patients (347 participants), five studies included a mixed population of juvenile idiopathic scoliosis and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (1330 participants), and five studies included adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients only (624 participants). The random pooled estimated progression rate was 49% (95% confidence interval = 1%-97%) for infantile idiopathic scoliosis, 49% in a mixed group of patients affected by juvenile idiopathic scoliosis or adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (95% confidence interval = 19%-79%), and 42% in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (95% confidence interval = 11%-73%). Conclusions During growth, idiopathic scoliosis tends to progress in a high percentage of cases. The progression rate varies according to the age at diagnosis, with infantile scoliosis being the most unpredictable. There are many confounders, such as age, Risser sign and baseline Cobb angles that were not consistent among studies, making the data very heterogeneous.

AB - Objective The aim of the study was to provide a meta-analysis of current literature concerning the natural history of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Design A comprehensive search of Medline, Embase, And Scopus databases was conducted up to November 2016. Eligible works were prospective or retrospective studies that enrolled patients with infantile idiopathic scoliosis, juvenile idiopathic scoliosis, or adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, followed up without any treatment from the time of detection. A meta-analysis for proportion was performed. The following studies were grouped per diagnosis: infantile idiopathic scoliosis, juvenile idiopathic scoliosis, and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Results Of the 1797 citations screened, we assessed 61 full-text articles and included 13 of these (2301 participants). Three studies included infantile idiopathic scoliosis patients (347 participants), five studies included a mixed population of juvenile idiopathic scoliosis and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (1330 participants), and five studies included adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients only (624 participants). The random pooled estimated progression rate was 49% (95% confidence interval = 1%-97%) for infantile idiopathic scoliosis, 49% in a mixed group of patients affected by juvenile idiopathic scoliosis or adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (95% confidence interval = 19%-79%), and 42% in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (95% confidence interval = 11%-73%). Conclusions During growth, idiopathic scoliosis tends to progress in a high percentage of cases. The progression rate varies according to the age at diagnosis, with infantile scoliosis being the most unpredictable. There are many confounders, such as age, Risser sign and baseline Cobb angles that were not consistent among studies, making the data very heterogeneous.

KW - Growth

KW - Idiopathic Scoliosis

KW - Meta-Analysis

KW - Natural History

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045536704&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045536704&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000861

DO - 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000861

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85045536704

VL - 97

SP - 346

EP - 356

JO - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0894-9115

IS - 5

ER -