The OECI model: The experience of INT Milan with a focus on the integration of psycho-oncology support

Anna Roli, Claudia Borreani, Marco Bosisio, Elisabetta Bianchi, Vittorio Montefusco, Giorgia Gobbi, Marco Platania, Filomena Lavecchia, Marco Milanesi, Valeria Anselmi, Cecilia Melani, Giuseppe De Leo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The procedure for Organisation of European Cancer Institutes (OECI) accreditation identified the formation of MDTs for the diagnosis and scheduling of primary treatment with integration of supportive care as a key strength at Istituto Nazionale Tumori (INT). The opportunities for improvement highlighted by the OECI peer review inspired a study on the evaluation of psychological distress, with a view to integrating this evaluation into global patient management and to defining standardized criteria for the provision of psychological services. This article describes the OECI accreditation experience at INT and the study conducted between January and May 2015 on the evaluation of patients' distress levels during cancer treatment, defining a scorebased cutoff point that triggers the intervention of a psychologist. The Distress Thermometer was used as a tool for evaluating psychological distress, performed by nurses on admitting the patient. A total of 261 questionnaires were completed by patients admitted to the medical oncology and hematology departments, with an average distress value of 4.1, and 60% of patients experiencing clinically detectable emotional distress. Emotion-related problems had a significant association with a greater level of distress, while there were few reports of relationship issues as a cause of distress. As a result of the improvement initiative supported by the psychological distress evaluation study, we validated the screening questionnaire to be included at the initial patient evaluation stage with a cutoff point triggering the intervention by a psychologist at a score of ≥7.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S25-S32
JournalTumori
Volume101
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

Organizations
Psychology
Neoplasms
Accreditation
Trigger Points
Thermometers
Peer Review
Medical Oncology
Hematology
Emotions
Nurses
Therapeutics
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Accreditation
  • Organisation of European Cancer Institutes
  • Psycho-oncology
  • Supportive discipline

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Cite this

The OECI model : The experience of INT Milan with a focus on the integration of psycho-oncology support. / Roli, Anna; Borreani, Claudia; Bosisio, Marco; Bianchi, Elisabetta; Montefusco, Vittorio; Gobbi, Giorgia; Platania, Marco; Lavecchia, Filomena; Milanesi, Marco; Anselmi, Valeria; Melani, Cecilia; De Leo, Giuseppe.

In: Tumori, Vol. 101, 01.12.2015, p. S25-S32.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Roli, Anna ; Borreani, Claudia ; Bosisio, Marco ; Bianchi, Elisabetta ; Montefusco, Vittorio ; Gobbi, Giorgia ; Platania, Marco ; Lavecchia, Filomena ; Milanesi, Marco ; Anselmi, Valeria ; Melani, Cecilia ; De Leo, Giuseppe. / The OECI model : The experience of INT Milan with a focus on the integration of psycho-oncology support. In: Tumori. 2015 ; Vol. 101. pp. S25-S32.
@article{bbeccfd1a45b4c6abee5d3ad89f424dc,
title = "The OECI model: The experience of INT Milan with a focus on the integration of psycho-oncology support",
abstract = "The procedure for Organisation of European Cancer Institutes (OECI) accreditation identified the formation of MDTs for the diagnosis and scheduling of primary treatment with integration of supportive care as a key strength at Istituto Nazionale Tumori (INT). The opportunities for improvement highlighted by the OECI peer review inspired a study on the evaluation of psychological distress, with a view to integrating this evaluation into global patient management and to defining standardized criteria for the provision of psychological services. This article describes the OECI accreditation experience at INT and the study conducted between January and May 2015 on the evaluation of patients' distress levels during cancer treatment, defining a scorebased cutoff point that triggers the intervention of a psychologist. The Distress Thermometer was used as a tool for evaluating psychological distress, performed by nurses on admitting the patient. A total of 261 questionnaires were completed by patients admitted to the medical oncology and hematology departments, with an average distress value of 4.1, and 60{\%} of patients experiencing clinically detectable emotional distress. Emotion-related problems had a significant association with a greater level of distress, while there were few reports of relationship issues as a cause of distress. As a result of the improvement initiative supported by the psychological distress evaluation study, we validated the screening questionnaire to be included at the initial patient evaluation stage with a cutoff point triggering the intervention by a psychologist at a score of ≥7.",
keywords = "Accreditation, Organisation of European Cancer Institutes, Psycho-oncology, Supportive discipline",
author = "Anna Roli and Claudia Borreani and Marco Bosisio and Elisabetta Bianchi and Vittorio Montefusco and Giorgia Gobbi and Marco Platania and Filomena Lavecchia and Marco Milanesi and Valeria Anselmi and Cecilia Melani and {De Leo}, Giuseppe",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5301/tj.5000469",
language = "English",
volume = "101",
pages = "S25--S32",
journal = "Tumori",
issn = "0300-8916",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The OECI model

T2 - The experience of INT Milan with a focus on the integration of psycho-oncology support

AU - Roli, Anna

AU - Borreani, Claudia

AU - Bosisio, Marco

AU - Bianchi, Elisabetta

AU - Montefusco, Vittorio

AU - Gobbi, Giorgia

AU - Platania, Marco

AU - Lavecchia, Filomena

AU - Milanesi, Marco

AU - Anselmi, Valeria

AU - Melani, Cecilia

AU - De Leo, Giuseppe

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - The procedure for Organisation of European Cancer Institutes (OECI) accreditation identified the formation of MDTs for the diagnosis and scheduling of primary treatment with integration of supportive care as a key strength at Istituto Nazionale Tumori (INT). The opportunities for improvement highlighted by the OECI peer review inspired a study on the evaluation of psychological distress, with a view to integrating this evaluation into global patient management and to defining standardized criteria for the provision of psychological services. This article describes the OECI accreditation experience at INT and the study conducted between January and May 2015 on the evaluation of patients' distress levels during cancer treatment, defining a scorebased cutoff point that triggers the intervention of a psychologist. The Distress Thermometer was used as a tool for evaluating psychological distress, performed by nurses on admitting the patient. A total of 261 questionnaires were completed by patients admitted to the medical oncology and hematology departments, with an average distress value of 4.1, and 60% of patients experiencing clinically detectable emotional distress. Emotion-related problems had a significant association with a greater level of distress, while there were few reports of relationship issues as a cause of distress. As a result of the improvement initiative supported by the psychological distress evaluation study, we validated the screening questionnaire to be included at the initial patient evaluation stage with a cutoff point triggering the intervention by a psychologist at a score of ≥7.

AB - The procedure for Organisation of European Cancer Institutes (OECI) accreditation identified the formation of MDTs for the diagnosis and scheduling of primary treatment with integration of supportive care as a key strength at Istituto Nazionale Tumori (INT). The opportunities for improvement highlighted by the OECI peer review inspired a study on the evaluation of psychological distress, with a view to integrating this evaluation into global patient management and to defining standardized criteria for the provision of psychological services. This article describes the OECI accreditation experience at INT and the study conducted between January and May 2015 on the evaluation of patients' distress levels during cancer treatment, defining a scorebased cutoff point that triggers the intervention of a psychologist. The Distress Thermometer was used as a tool for evaluating psychological distress, performed by nurses on admitting the patient. A total of 261 questionnaires were completed by patients admitted to the medical oncology and hematology departments, with an average distress value of 4.1, and 60% of patients experiencing clinically detectable emotional distress. Emotion-related problems had a significant association with a greater level of distress, while there were few reports of relationship issues as a cause of distress. As a result of the improvement initiative supported by the psychological distress evaluation study, we validated the screening questionnaire to be included at the initial patient evaluation stage with a cutoff point triggering the intervention by a psychologist at a score of ≥7.

KW - Accreditation

KW - Organisation of European Cancer Institutes

KW - Psycho-oncology

KW - Supportive discipline

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958677779&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958677779&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5301/tj.5000469

DO - 10.5301/tj.5000469

M3 - Article

C2 - 27096269

AN - SCOPUS:84958677779

VL - 101

SP - S25-S32

JO - Tumori

JF - Tumori

SN - 0300-8916

ER -