The paradox of pelvic exenteration: The interaction of clinical and psychological variables

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Objectives To text the feasibility of a psychological intervention package administered to 49 pelvic exenteration candidates, aimed at evaluating the preoperative prevalence of psychological distress and assessing the presence of any correlation between preoperative psychological distress and clinical variables such as pain and hospitalization length. Methods Patients were referred to the psychology unit from the very beginning of their clinical pathway and were administered the Psychological Distress Inventory (PDI) and the Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer (Mini-MAC) questionnaire at prehospital admission. Patients presenting with a significant level of distress received nonstandardized psychological support. Statistical analyses were performed to detect the presence of any correlation between psychological variables at prehospital admission and clinical outcomes. Results The 40% of patients had significant levels of distress at prehospital admission (PDI ≥ 30). As regards Mini-MAC, the mean value of fighting spirit attitude and fatalism was higher in our sample than in the normative sample of the Mini-MAC validation study in the Italian cancer population. Their anxious preoccupation attitude was lower. There were no correlations between clinical and psychological variables: level of postsurgery pain was higher (3.7) in the subgroup of patients with presurgery PDI <30 compared with those with PDI ≥ 30 (3.5). However, this difference was not statistically significant (P = 1.00). Considering hospitalization length, the above described trend was similar. Conclusions Although highly distressed, pelvic exenteration candidates show an adaptive range of coping mechanisms. This calls for a greater effort in studying the complexity of their psychoemotional status to provide them with the best multidisciplinary care. Extensive study of the real effectiveness of psychological intervention is warranted: randomized clinical trials could help in detecting the presence of any correlation between clinical and psychological variables in a multidisciplinary approach.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1534-1540
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1 2015


  • Clinical outcomes
  • Health psychology
  • Multidisciplinary approach
  • Pelvic exenteration
  • Psychological distress

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology
  • Oncology


Dive into the research topics of 'The paradox of pelvic exenteration: The interaction of clinical and psychological variables'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this