The permanent expandable implant in breast aesthetic, corrective and reconstructive surgery

P. Berrino, P. L. Santi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since 1986 we have considered the permanent expandable implant (PEI) as the first choice of prosthesis breast surgery. The possibilities offered by multiple over-expansions and deflations have been explored; 187 PEI were utilized in 136 patients for aesthetic (32 with bilateral hypoplasia), corrective (17 with asymmetry, tubular breasts or Poland's syndrome) and reconstructive breast surgery (87 patients for immediate or delayed reconstruction following radical, modified radical, partial or subcutaneous mastectomy). All implants were positioned submuscularly; a latissimus dorsi muscular flap was transposed when the pectoralis major was absent or damaged. Either the Becker or the Gibney implant was used. The filling port was retained in order to take permanent advantage of the properties of the PEI. The dome was placed deep in the axilla, where it could not readily be palpated by patients. All PEI were immediately or progressively overinflated by 25-80% and then deflated to the planned optimal volume. Twenty-two patients developing capsular contracture were treated by overinflations and deflations with subjective and objective improvement. Many of the augmentation mammaplasty patients refused implant deflation to the planned preoperative volume. The over-expansion/deflation process proved to be effective in obtaining ptosis, in maintaining permanent volume symmetry and in keeping the base of tubular breasts unfolded. Moreover, the psychological advantages of patient's involvement in the procedure are significant.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)63-68
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Journal of Plastic Surgery
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 1991

Fingerprint

Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
Breast Implants
Plastic Surgery
Breast
Subcutaneous Mastectomy
Poland Syndrome
Modified Radical Mastectomy
Patient Participation
Axilla
Superficial Back Muscles
Segmental Mastectomy
Mammaplasty
Contracture
Esthetics
Prostheses and Implants
Psychology

Keywords

  • Augmentation
  • Permanent expander implants
  • Reconstruction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

The permanent expandable implant in breast aesthetic, corrective and reconstructive surgery. / Berrino, P.; Santi, P. L.

In: European Journal of Plastic Surgery, Vol. 14, No. 2, 03.1991, p. 63-68.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bc93e69039654fe1be55c3147cb7a941,
title = "The permanent expandable implant in breast aesthetic, corrective and reconstructive surgery",
abstract = "Since 1986 we have considered the permanent expandable implant (PEI) as the first choice of prosthesis breast surgery. The possibilities offered by multiple over-expansions and deflations have been explored; 187 PEI were utilized in 136 patients for aesthetic (32 with bilateral hypoplasia), corrective (17 with asymmetry, tubular breasts or Poland's syndrome) and reconstructive breast surgery (87 patients for immediate or delayed reconstruction following radical, modified radical, partial or subcutaneous mastectomy). All implants were positioned submuscularly; a latissimus dorsi muscular flap was transposed when the pectoralis major was absent or damaged. Either the Becker or the Gibney implant was used. The filling port was retained in order to take permanent advantage of the properties of the PEI. The dome was placed deep in the axilla, where it could not readily be palpated by patients. All PEI were immediately or progressively overinflated by 25-80{\%} and then deflated to the planned optimal volume. Twenty-two patients developing capsular contracture were treated by overinflations and deflations with subjective and objective improvement. Many of the augmentation mammaplasty patients refused implant deflation to the planned preoperative volume. The over-expansion/deflation process proved to be effective in obtaining ptosis, in maintaining permanent volume symmetry and in keeping the base of tubular breasts unfolded. Moreover, the psychological advantages of patient's involvement in the procedure are significant.",
keywords = "Augmentation, Permanent expander implants, Reconstruction",
author = "P. Berrino and Santi, {P. L.}",
year = "1991",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/BF00209805",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "63--68",
journal = "European Journal of Plastic Surgery",
issn = "0930-343X",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The permanent expandable implant in breast aesthetic, corrective and reconstructive surgery

AU - Berrino, P.

AU - Santi, P. L.

PY - 1991/3

Y1 - 1991/3

N2 - Since 1986 we have considered the permanent expandable implant (PEI) as the first choice of prosthesis breast surgery. The possibilities offered by multiple over-expansions and deflations have been explored; 187 PEI were utilized in 136 patients for aesthetic (32 with bilateral hypoplasia), corrective (17 with asymmetry, tubular breasts or Poland's syndrome) and reconstructive breast surgery (87 patients for immediate or delayed reconstruction following radical, modified radical, partial or subcutaneous mastectomy). All implants were positioned submuscularly; a latissimus dorsi muscular flap was transposed when the pectoralis major was absent or damaged. Either the Becker or the Gibney implant was used. The filling port was retained in order to take permanent advantage of the properties of the PEI. The dome was placed deep in the axilla, where it could not readily be palpated by patients. All PEI were immediately or progressively overinflated by 25-80% and then deflated to the planned optimal volume. Twenty-two patients developing capsular contracture were treated by overinflations and deflations with subjective and objective improvement. Many of the augmentation mammaplasty patients refused implant deflation to the planned preoperative volume. The over-expansion/deflation process proved to be effective in obtaining ptosis, in maintaining permanent volume symmetry and in keeping the base of tubular breasts unfolded. Moreover, the psychological advantages of patient's involvement in the procedure are significant.

AB - Since 1986 we have considered the permanent expandable implant (PEI) as the first choice of prosthesis breast surgery. The possibilities offered by multiple over-expansions and deflations have been explored; 187 PEI were utilized in 136 patients for aesthetic (32 with bilateral hypoplasia), corrective (17 with asymmetry, tubular breasts or Poland's syndrome) and reconstructive breast surgery (87 patients for immediate or delayed reconstruction following radical, modified radical, partial or subcutaneous mastectomy). All implants were positioned submuscularly; a latissimus dorsi muscular flap was transposed when the pectoralis major was absent or damaged. Either the Becker or the Gibney implant was used. The filling port was retained in order to take permanent advantage of the properties of the PEI. The dome was placed deep in the axilla, where it could not readily be palpated by patients. All PEI were immediately or progressively overinflated by 25-80% and then deflated to the planned optimal volume. Twenty-two patients developing capsular contracture were treated by overinflations and deflations with subjective and objective improvement. Many of the augmentation mammaplasty patients refused implant deflation to the planned preoperative volume. The over-expansion/deflation process proved to be effective in obtaining ptosis, in maintaining permanent volume symmetry and in keeping the base of tubular breasts unfolded. Moreover, the psychological advantages of patient's involvement in the procedure are significant.

KW - Augmentation

KW - Permanent expander implants

KW - Reconstruction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026082689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026082689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF00209805

DO - 10.1007/BF00209805

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0026082689

VL - 14

SP - 63

EP - 68

JO - European Journal of Plastic Surgery

JF - European Journal of Plastic Surgery

SN - 0930-343X

IS - 2

ER -