The pivot shift: A global user guide

Volker Musahl, Yuichi Hoshino, Mattias Ahlden, Paulo Araujo, James J. Irrgang, Stefano Zaffagnini, Jon Karlsson, Freddie H. Fu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The use of several different maneuvers for the pivot shift test has resulted in inconsistent quantitative measurements. The purpose of this study was to describe, analyze, and group several surgeon-specific techniques for the pivot shift test and to propose a standardized pivot shift test. Methods: Twelve expert surgeons examined a whole lower cadaveric extremity with their preferred technique and assigned a clinical grade, I-III. Anterior tibial translation and acceleration were measured using an electromagnetic system. The test was repeated after watching an instructional video focused on a standardized pivot shift technique. Measurements were repeated and compared with the preferred technique. Results: The expert surgeons utilized valgus stress unanimously in addition to fixed internal rotation (n = 5), fixed external rotation (n = 1), a motion-allowing technique (n = 3), a dislocation-type maneuver (n = 2), and a fixed anterior drawer type of maneuver in extension (n = 1). Anterior tibial translation measured was on average 15.9 ± 3.7 mm. Average tibial acceleration was 3.3 ± 2.1 mm/s 2. Average clinical grading was 2.3 ± 0.5. There were no differences in average clinical grading when using high stress (2.5 ± 0.6) versus low stress (2.3 ± 0.5, n. s.), or using fixed rotation (2.2 ± 0.5) versus a motion-allowing technique (2.3 ± 0.6; n. s.). Conclusions: Clinical grading, tibial translation, and acceleration vary between examiners performing the pivot shift test. High forces and extremes of rotation are not necessary to produce a clinical detectable pivot shift. In the future, a standardized pivot shift test-which can be performed universally and utilizes only gentle forces allowing motion to occur-may be beneficial when assessing differences in outcome following ACL reconstruction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)724-731
Number of pages8
JournalKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

Electromagnetic Phenomena
Lower Extremity
Surgeons

Keywords

  • Acceleration
  • ACL
  • Pivot shift
  • Standard technique

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Musahl, V., Hoshino, Y., Ahlden, M., Araujo, P., Irrgang, J. J., Zaffagnini, S., ... Fu, F. H. (2012). The pivot shift: A global user guide. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 20(4), 724-731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1859-4

The pivot shift : A global user guide. / Musahl, Volker; Hoshino, Yuichi; Ahlden, Mattias; Araujo, Paulo; Irrgang, James J.; Zaffagnini, Stefano; Karlsson, Jon; Fu, Freddie H.

In: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, Vol. 20, No. 4, 04.2012, p. 724-731.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Musahl, V, Hoshino, Y, Ahlden, M, Araujo, P, Irrgang, JJ, Zaffagnini, S, Karlsson, J & Fu, FH 2012, 'The pivot shift: A global user guide', Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 724-731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1859-4
Musahl, Volker ; Hoshino, Yuichi ; Ahlden, Mattias ; Araujo, Paulo ; Irrgang, James J. ; Zaffagnini, Stefano ; Karlsson, Jon ; Fu, Freddie H. / The pivot shift : A global user guide. In: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2012 ; Vol. 20, No. 4. pp. 724-731.
@article{70b8f17397714b21a5ed649d2832d09a,
title = "The pivot shift: A global user guide",
abstract = "Purpose: The use of several different maneuvers for the pivot shift test has resulted in inconsistent quantitative measurements. The purpose of this study was to describe, analyze, and group several surgeon-specific techniques for the pivot shift test and to propose a standardized pivot shift test. Methods: Twelve expert surgeons examined a whole lower cadaveric extremity with their preferred technique and assigned a clinical grade, I-III. Anterior tibial translation and acceleration were measured using an electromagnetic system. The test was repeated after watching an instructional video focused on a standardized pivot shift technique. Measurements were repeated and compared with the preferred technique. Results: The expert surgeons utilized valgus stress unanimously in addition to fixed internal rotation (n = 5), fixed external rotation (n = 1), a motion-allowing technique (n = 3), a dislocation-type maneuver (n = 2), and a fixed anterior drawer type of maneuver in extension (n = 1). Anterior tibial translation measured was on average 15.9 ± 3.7 mm. Average tibial acceleration was 3.3 ± 2.1 mm/s 2. Average clinical grading was 2.3 ± 0.5. There were no differences in average clinical grading when using high stress (2.5 ± 0.6) versus low stress (2.3 ± 0.5, n. s.), or using fixed rotation (2.2 ± 0.5) versus a motion-allowing technique (2.3 ± 0.6; n. s.). Conclusions: Clinical grading, tibial translation, and acceleration vary between examiners performing the pivot shift test. High forces and extremes of rotation are not necessary to produce a clinical detectable pivot shift. In the future, a standardized pivot shift test-which can be performed universally and utilizes only gentle forces allowing motion to occur-may be beneficial when assessing differences in outcome following ACL reconstruction.",
keywords = "Acceleration, ACL, Pivot shift, Standard technique",
author = "Volker Musahl and Yuichi Hoshino and Mattias Ahlden and Paulo Araujo and Irrgang, {James J.} and Stefano Zaffagnini and Jon Karlsson and Fu, {Freddie H.}",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s00167-011-1859-4",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "724--731",
journal = "Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy",
issn = "0942-2056",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The pivot shift

T2 - A global user guide

AU - Musahl, Volker

AU - Hoshino, Yuichi

AU - Ahlden, Mattias

AU - Araujo, Paulo

AU - Irrgang, James J.

AU - Zaffagnini, Stefano

AU - Karlsson, Jon

AU - Fu, Freddie H.

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - Purpose: The use of several different maneuvers for the pivot shift test has resulted in inconsistent quantitative measurements. The purpose of this study was to describe, analyze, and group several surgeon-specific techniques for the pivot shift test and to propose a standardized pivot shift test. Methods: Twelve expert surgeons examined a whole lower cadaveric extremity with their preferred technique and assigned a clinical grade, I-III. Anterior tibial translation and acceleration were measured using an electromagnetic system. The test was repeated after watching an instructional video focused on a standardized pivot shift technique. Measurements were repeated and compared with the preferred technique. Results: The expert surgeons utilized valgus stress unanimously in addition to fixed internal rotation (n = 5), fixed external rotation (n = 1), a motion-allowing technique (n = 3), a dislocation-type maneuver (n = 2), and a fixed anterior drawer type of maneuver in extension (n = 1). Anterior tibial translation measured was on average 15.9 ± 3.7 mm. Average tibial acceleration was 3.3 ± 2.1 mm/s 2. Average clinical grading was 2.3 ± 0.5. There were no differences in average clinical grading when using high stress (2.5 ± 0.6) versus low stress (2.3 ± 0.5, n. s.), or using fixed rotation (2.2 ± 0.5) versus a motion-allowing technique (2.3 ± 0.6; n. s.). Conclusions: Clinical grading, tibial translation, and acceleration vary between examiners performing the pivot shift test. High forces and extremes of rotation are not necessary to produce a clinical detectable pivot shift. In the future, a standardized pivot shift test-which can be performed universally and utilizes only gentle forces allowing motion to occur-may be beneficial when assessing differences in outcome following ACL reconstruction.

AB - Purpose: The use of several different maneuvers for the pivot shift test has resulted in inconsistent quantitative measurements. The purpose of this study was to describe, analyze, and group several surgeon-specific techniques for the pivot shift test and to propose a standardized pivot shift test. Methods: Twelve expert surgeons examined a whole lower cadaveric extremity with their preferred technique and assigned a clinical grade, I-III. Anterior tibial translation and acceleration were measured using an electromagnetic system. The test was repeated after watching an instructional video focused on a standardized pivot shift technique. Measurements were repeated and compared with the preferred technique. Results: The expert surgeons utilized valgus stress unanimously in addition to fixed internal rotation (n = 5), fixed external rotation (n = 1), a motion-allowing technique (n = 3), a dislocation-type maneuver (n = 2), and a fixed anterior drawer type of maneuver in extension (n = 1). Anterior tibial translation measured was on average 15.9 ± 3.7 mm. Average tibial acceleration was 3.3 ± 2.1 mm/s 2. Average clinical grading was 2.3 ± 0.5. There were no differences in average clinical grading when using high stress (2.5 ± 0.6) versus low stress (2.3 ± 0.5, n. s.), or using fixed rotation (2.2 ± 0.5) versus a motion-allowing technique (2.3 ± 0.6; n. s.). Conclusions: Clinical grading, tibial translation, and acceleration vary between examiners performing the pivot shift test. High forces and extremes of rotation are not necessary to produce a clinical detectable pivot shift. In the future, a standardized pivot shift test-which can be performed universally and utilizes only gentle forces allowing motion to occur-may be beneficial when assessing differences in outcome following ACL reconstruction.

KW - Acceleration

KW - ACL

KW - Pivot shift

KW - Standard technique

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858754205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858754205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00167-011-1859-4

DO - 10.1007/s00167-011-1859-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 22210541

AN - SCOPUS:84858754205

VL - 20

SP - 724

EP - 731

JO - Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

JF - Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

SN - 0942-2056

IS - 4

ER -