The positive role of caregivers in terminal cancer patients' abilities: Usefulness of the ICF framework

Anna Giardini, Pietro Ferrari, Enrica M. Negri, Giuseppina Majani, Caterina Magnani, Pietro Preti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Among the purposes of palliative care, reducing perceived disability during the terminal stages of illness is of paramount importance. AIM: The aim of this study was to shed light on the possible role of the caregiver as a modulator of disability in patients with advanced cancer receiving end-of-life palliative care by means of the WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). DESIGN: Observational prospective cross-sectional study. SETTING: Inpatients of a Palliative Care Unit. POPULATION : Fifty consecutively-enrolled inpatients (aged 69.9±10.6), in bed on average for more than 50% of daily hours (Karnofsky Performance Status Scale: 31.2±10.0) and functionally severely compromised (Barthel Index: 45.3±19.7); the average estimated survival was 6 weeks or more (Palliative Prognostic Index: 5.5±2.4). METHODS: Inpatients compiled a self-report questionnaire on quality of life (SF-12) and were interviewed on the ICF checklist. RESULTS: Patients reported significantly lower quality of life scores (SF-12) than the normative sample for both the Physical Component Summary Score (29.2±8.1 vs. 50.0±9.4; Student's t-test P=0.00001) and the Mental Component Summary Score (39.7±11.8 vs. 50.0±9.9; P=0.01). As to ICF Activity and Participation delta (?) values, describing caregiver's impact on patient's life: 26 domains had a median ?=0 (neutral caregiver's role), 10 domains had a median ?>0 (caregiver as a positive modulator of the patient's disability); no negative ? values were reported (caregiver never considered as a barrier). Environmental Factors were mainly facilitators. CONCLUSIONS: Even if patients were mostly confined to bed, with reduced functional autonomy and marked dependency on others, their disability was reduced thanks to the caregiver's modulator role. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The ICF framework could also be extended to palliative care, because by integrating the standard functional assessment, it allows to identify two levels of intervention: one directly affecting patients' activity and participation, and one related to barriers and facilitators (i.e., caregivers, environmental factors).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)214-222
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Volume52
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1 2016

Fingerprint

Caregivers
Palliative Care
Neoplasms
Inpatients
Quality of Life
International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health
Patient Participation
Karnofsky Performance Status
Terminal Care
Checklist
Self Report
Rehabilitation
Cross-Sectional Studies
Students
Survival

Keywords

  • Caregivers
  • Disability and health
  • Disability evaluation
  • International classification of functioning
  • Palliative care
  • Quality of life
  • Terminal care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

The positive role of caregivers in terminal cancer patients' abilities : Usefulness of the ICF framework. / Giardini, Anna; Ferrari, Pietro; Negri, Enrica M.; Majani, Giuseppina; Magnani, Caterina; Preti, Pietro.

In: European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol. 52, No. 2, 01.04.2016, p. 214-222.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Giardini, Anna ; Ferrari, Pietro ; Negri, Enrica M. ; Majani, Giuseppina ; Magnani, Caterina ; Preti, Pietro. / The positive role of caregivers in terminal cancer patients' abilities : Usefulness of the ICF framework. In: European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 2016 ; Vol. 52, No. 2. pp. 214-222.
@article{23f6868ec5c44f76af7629b3bf7c7576,
title = "The positive role of caregivers in terminal cancer patients' abilities: Usefulness of the ICF framework",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Among the purposes of palliative care, reducing perceived disability during the terminal stages of illness is of paramount importance. AIM: The aim of this study was to shed light on the possible role of the caregiver as a modulator of disability in patients with advanced cancer receiving end-of-life palliative care by means of the WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). DESIGN: Observational prospective cross-sectional study. SETTING: Inpatients of a Palliative Care Unit. POPULATION : Fifty consecutively-enrolled inpatients (aged 69.9±10.6), in bed on average for more than 50{\%} of daily hours (Karnofsky Performance Status Scale: 31.2±10.0) and functionally severely compromised (Barthel Index: 45.3±19.7); the average estimated survival was 6 weeks or more (Palliative Prognostic Index: 5.5±2.4). METHODS: Inpatients compiled a self-report questionnaire on quality of life (SF-12) and were interviewed on the ICF checklist. RESULTS: Patients reported significantly lower quality of life scores (SF-12) than the normative sample for both the Physical Component Summary Score (29.2±8.1 vs. 50.0±9.4; Student's t-test P=0.00001) and the Mental Component Summary Score (39.7±11.8 vs. 50.0±9.9; P=0.01). As to ICF Activity and Participation delta (?) values, describing caregiver's impact on patient's life: 26 domains had a median ?=0 (neutral caregiver's role), 10 domains had a median ?>0 (caregiver as a positive modulator of the patient's disability); no negative ? values were reported (caregiver never considered as a barrier). Environmental Factors were mainly facilitators. CONCLUSIONS: Even if patients were mostly confined to bed, with reduced functional autonomy and marked dependency on others, their disability was reduced thanks to the caregiver's modulator role. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The ICF framework could also be extended to palliative care, because by integrating the standard functional assessment, it allows to identify two levels of intervention: one directly affecting patients' activity and participation, and one related to barriers and facilitators (i.e., caregivers, environmental factors).",
keywords = "Caregivers, Disability and health, Disability evaluation, International classification of functioning, Palliative care, Quality of life, Terminal care",
author = "Anna Giardini and Pietro Ferrari and Negri, {Enrica M.} and Giuseppina Majani and Caterina Magnani and Pietro Preti",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "214--222",
journal = "European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine",
issn = "1973-9087",
publisher = "Edizioni Minerva Medica S.p.A.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The positive role of caregivers in terminal cancer patients' abilities

T2 - Usefulness of the ICF framework

AU - Giardini, Anna

AU - Ferrari, Pietro

AU - Negri, Enrica M.

AU - Majani, Giuseppina

AU - Magnani, Caterina

AU - Preti, Pietro

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Among the purposes of palliative care, reducing perceived disability during the terminal stages of illness is of paramount importance. AIM: The aim of this study was to shed light on the possible role of the caregiver as a modulator of disability in patients with advanced cancer receiving end-of-life palliative care by means of the WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). DESIGN: Observational prospective cross-sectional study. SETTING: Inpatients of a Palliative Care Unit. POPULATION : Fifty consecutively-enrolled inpatients (aged 69.9±10.6), in bed on average for more than 50% of daily hours (Karnofsky Performance Status Scale: 31.2±10.0) and functionally severely compromised (Barthel Index: 45.3±19.7); the average estimated survival was 6 weeks or more (Palliative Prognostic Index: 5.5±2.4). METHODS: Inpatients compiled a self-report questionnaire on quality of life (SF-12) and were interviewed on the ICF checklist. RESULTS: Patients reported significantly lower quality of life scores (SF-12) than the normative sample for both the Physical Component Summary Score (29.2±8.1 vs. 50.0±9.4; Student's t-test P=0.00001) and the Mental Component Summary Score (39.7±11.8 vs. 50.0±9.9; P=0.01). As to ICF Activity and Participation delta (?) values, describing caregiver's impact on patient's life: 26 domains had a median ?=0 (neutral caregiver's role), 10 domains had a median ?>0 (caregiver as a positive modulator of the patient's disability); no negative ? values were reported (caregiver never considered as a barrier). Environmental Factors were mainly facilitators. CONCLUSIONS: Even if patients were mostly confined to bed, with reduced functional autonomy and marked dependency on others, their disability was reduced thanks to the caregiver's modulator role. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The ICF framework could also be extended to palliative care, because by integrating the standard functional assessment, it allows to identify two levels of intervention: one directly affecting patients' activity and participation, and one related to barriers and facilitators (i.e., caregivers, environmental factors).

AB - BACKGROUND: Among the purposes of palliative care, reducing perceived disability during the terminal stages of illness is of paramount importance. AIM: The aim of this study was to shed light on the possible role of the caregiver as a modulator of disability in patients with advanced cancer receiving end-of-life palliative care by means of the WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). DESIGN: Observational prospective cross-sectional study. SETTING: Inpatients of a Palliative Care Unit. POPULATION : Fifty consecutively-enrolled inpatients (aged 69.9±10.6), in bed on average for more than 50% of daily hours (Karnofsky Performance Status Scale: 31.2±10.0) and functionally severely compromised (Barthel Index: 45.3±19.7); the average estimated survival was 6 weeks or more (Palliative Prognostic Index: 5.5±2.4). METHODS: Inpatients compiled a self-report questionnaire on quality of life (SF-12) and were interviewed on the ICF checklist. RESULTS: Patients reported significantly lower quality of life scores (SF-12) than the normative sample for both the Physical Component Summary Score (29.2±8.1 vs. 50.0±9.4; Student's t-test P=0.00001) and the Mental Component Summary Score (39.7±11.8 vs. 50.0±9.9; P=0.01). As to ICF Activity and Participation delta (?) values, describing caregiver's impact on patient's life: 26 domains had a median ?=0 (neutral caregiver's role), 10 domains had a median ?>0 (caregiver as a positive modulator of the patient's disability); no negative ? values were reported (caregiver never considered as a barrier). Environmental Factors were mainly facilitators. CONCLUSIONS: Even if patients were mostly confined to bed, with reduced functional autonomy and marked dependency on others, their disability was reduced thanks to the caregiver's modulator role. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The ICF framework could also be extended to palliative care, because by integrating the standard functional assessment, it allows to identify two levels of intervention: one directly affecting patients' activity and participation, and one related to barriers and facilitators (i.e., caregivers, environmental factors).

KW - Caregivers

KW - Disability and health

KW - Disability evaluation

KW - International classification of functioning

KW - Palliative care

KW - Quality of life

KW - Terminal care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84971441766&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84971441766&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84971441766

VL - 52

SP - 214

EP - 222

JO - European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

JF - European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

SN - 1973-9087

IS - 2

ER -