The possible effects on socio-economic inequalities of introducing HPV testing as primary test in cervical cancer screening programs

Paolo Giorgi Rossi, Flavia Baldacchini, Guglielmo Ronco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Screening with HPV is more effective than Pap test in preventing cervical cancer. HPV as primary test will imply longer intervals and a triage test for HPV positive women. It will also permit the development of self-sampling devices. These innovations may affect population coverage, participation, and compliance to protocols, and likely in a different way for less educated, poorer, and disadvantaged women.Aim: To describe the impact on inequalities, actual or presumed, of the introduction of HPV-based screening. Methods: The putative HPV-based screening algorithm has been analyzed to identify critical points for inequalities. A systematic review of the literature has been conducted searching PubMed on HPV screening coverage, participation, and compliance. Results were summarized in a narrative synthesis. Results: Knowledge about HPV and cervical cancer was lower in women with low socio-economic status and in disadvantaged groups. A correct communication can reduce differences. Longer intervals will make it easier to achieve high-population coverage, but higher cost of the test in private providers could reduce the use of opportunistic screening by disadvantaged women. There are some evidences that inviting for HPV test instead of Pap increases participation, but there are no data on social differences. Self-sampling devices are effective in increasing participation and coverage. Some studies showed that the acceptability of self-sampling is higher in more educated women, but there is also an effect on hard-to-reach women. Communication of HPV positivity may increase anxiety and impact on sexual behaviors, the effect is stronger in low educated and disadvantaged women. Finally, many studies found indirect evidence that unvaccinated women are or will be more probably under-screened. Conclusion: The introduction of HPV test may increase population coverage, but non-compliance to protocols and interaction with opportunistic screening can increase the existing inequalities.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberArticle 20
JournalFrontiers in Oncology
Volume4 MAR
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Early Detection of Cancer
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Economics
Vulnerable Populations
Papanicolaou Test
Communication
Population
Guideline Adherence
Equipment and Supplies
Triage
PubMed
Sexual Behavior
Compliance
Anxiety
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Compliance
  • Coverage
  • Human papillomavirus
  • Mass screening
  • Participation
  • Social inequalities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Cite this

The possible effects on socio-economic inequalities of introducing HPV testing as primary test in cervical cancer screening programs. / Rossi, Paolo Giorgi; Baldacchini, Flavia; Ronco, Guglielmo.

In: Frontiers in Oncology, Vol. 4 MAR, Article 20, 2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{28b99622a0d546419f0d3a0af99d9106,
title = "The possible effects on socio-economic inequalities of introducing HPV testing as primary test in cervical cancer screening programs",
abstract = "Background: Screening with HPV is more effective than Pap test in preventing cervical cancer. HPV as primary test will imply longer intervals and a triage test for HPV positive women. It will also permit the development of self-sampling devices. These innovations may affect population coverage, participation, and compliance to protocols, and likely in a different way for less educated, poorer, and disadvantaged women.Aim: To describe the impact on inequalities, actual or presumed, of the introduction of HPV-based screening. Methods: The putative HPV-based screening algorithm has been analyzed to identify critical points for inequalities. A systematic review of the literature has been conducted searching PubMed on HPV screening coverage, participation, and compliance. Results were summarized in a narrative synthesis. Results: Knowledge about HPV and cervical cancer was lower in women with low socio-economic status and in disadvantaged groups. A correct communication can reduce differences. Longer intervals will make it easier to achieve high-population coverage, but higher cost of the test in private providers could reduce the use of opportunistic screening by disadvantaged women. There are some evidences that inviting for HPV test instead of Pap increases participation, but there are no data on social differences. Self-sampling devices are effective in increasing participation and coverage. Some studies showed that the acceptability of self-sampling is higher in more educated women, but there is also an effect on hard-to-reach women. Communication of HPV positivity may increase anxiety and impact on sexual behaviors, the effect is stronger in low educated and disadvantaged women. Finally, many studies found indirect evidence that unvaccinated women are or will be more probably under-screened. Conclusion: The introduction of HPV test may increase population coverage, but non-compliance to protocols and interaction with opportunistic screening can increase the existing inequalities.",
keywords = "Compliance, Coverage, Human papillomavirus, Mass screening, Participation, Social inequalities",
author = "Rossi, {Paolo Giorgi} and Flavia Baldacchini and Guglielmo Ronco",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.3389/fonc.2014.00020",
language = "English",
volume = "4 MAR",
journal = "Frontiers in Oncology",
issn = "2234-943X",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S. A.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The possible effects on socio-economic inequalities of introducing HPV testing as primary test in cervical cancer screening programs

AU - Rossi, Paolo Giorgi

AU - Baldacchini, Flavia

AU - Ronco, Guglielmo

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background: Screening with HPV is more effective than Pap test in preventing cervical cancer. HPV as primary test will imply longer intervals and a triage test for HPV positive women. It will also permit the development of self-sampling devices. These innovations may affect population coverage, participation, and compliance to protocols, and likely in a different way for less educated, poorer, and disadvantaged women.Aim: To describe the impact on inequalities, actual or presumed, of the introduction of HPV-based screening. Methods: The putative HPV-based screening algorithm has been analyzed to identify critical points for inequalities. A systematic review of the literature has been conducted searching PubMed on HPV screening coverage, participation, and compliance. Results were summarized in a narrative synthesis. Results: Knowledge about HPV and cervical cancer was lower in women with low socio-economic status and in disadvantaged groups. A correct communication can reduce differences. Longer intervals will make it easier to achieve high-population coverage, but higher cost of the test in private providers could reduce the use of opportunistic screening by disadvantaged women. There are some evidences that inviting for HPV test instead of Pap increases participation, but there are no data on social differences. Self-sampling devices are effective in increasing participation and coverage. Some studies showed that the acceptability of self-sampling is higher in more educated women, but there is also an effect on hard-to-reach women. Communication of HPV positivity may increase anxiety and impact on sexual behaviors, the effect is stronger in low educated and disadvantaged women. Finally, many studies found indirect evidence that unvaccinated women are or will be more probably under-screened. Conclusion: The introduction of HPV test may increase population coverage, but non-compliance to protocols and interaction with opportunistic screening can increase the existing inequalities.

AB - Background: Screening with HPV is more effective than Pap test in preventing cervical cancer. HPV as primary test will imply longer intervals and a triage test for HPV positive women. It will also permit the development of self-sampling devices. These innovations may affect population coverage, participation, and compliance to protocols, and likely in a different way for less educated, poorer, and disadvantaged women.Aim: To describe the impact on inequalities, actual or presumed, of the introduction of HPV-based screening. Methods: The putative HPV-based screening algorithm has been analyzed to identify critical points for inequalities. A systematic review of the literature has been conducted searching PubMed on HPV screening coverage, participation, and compliance. Results were summarized in a narrative synthesis. Results: Knowledge about HPV and cervical cancer was lower in women with low socio-economic status and in disadvantaged groups. A correct communication can reduce differences. Longer intervals will make it easier to achieve high-population coverage, but higher cost of the test in private providers could reduce the use of opportunistic screening by disadvantaged women. There are some evidences that inviting for HPV test instead of Pap increases participation, but there are no data on social differences. Self-sampling devices are effective in increasing participation and coverage. Some studies showed that the acceptability of self-sampling is higher in more educated women, but there is also an effect on hard-to-reach women. Communication of HPV positivity may increase anxiety and impact on sexual behaviors, the effect is stronger in low educated and disadvantaged women. Finally, many studies found indirect evidence that unvaccinated women are or will be more probably under-screened. Conclusion: The introduction of HPV test may increase population coverage, but non-compliance to protocols and interaction with opportunistic screening can increase the existing inequalities.

KW - Compliance

KW - Coverage

KW - Human papillomavirus

KW - Mass screening

KW - Participation

KW - Social inequalities

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898050643&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898050643&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fonc.2014.00020

DO - 10.3389/fonc.2014.00020

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84898050643

VL - 4 MAR

JO - Frontiers in Oncology

JF - Frontiers in Oncology

SN - 2234-943X

M1 - Article 20

ER -