The precision of electronic apex locators in working length determination

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature

Igor Tsesis, Tamar Blazer, Gil Ben-Izhack, Silvio Taschieri, Massimo Del Fabbro, Stefano Corbella, Eyal Rosen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction This study aimed to evaluate the precision of electronic apex locators (EALs) in locating the apical constriction (AC) during a root canal treatment compared with a histologic evaluation of the AC as well as the effects of possible influencing factors by means of a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Methods A systematic search of the literature was performed to identify studies that histologically evaluated the precision of EALs in human teeth. The identified studies were subject to strict inclusion criteria followed by data extraction and meta-analysis. Results From 247 articles, 10 articles met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 1105 EAL measurements performed by 4 types of EALs: Root ZX (J Morita, Tokyo, Japan), Justy II (Hager & Werken GmbH & Co, Duisburg, Germany), Endy 5000 (Loser Co, Leverkusen, Germany), and Endox (Lysis Co, Milan, Italy). Root ZX, Justy II, and Endy 5000 were found to be significantly more accurate than Endox in determining the distance between the file tip and the apical constriction (P

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1818-1823
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Endodontics
Volume41
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 1 2015

Fingerprint

Constriction
Meta-Analysis
Germany
Tokyo
Dental Pulp Cavity
Italy
Tooth
Japan

Keywords

  • Apical constriction
  • electronic apex locators
  • root canals
  • working length

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

The precision of electronic apex locators in working length determination : A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. / Tsesis, Igor; Blazer, Tamar; Ben-Izhack, Gil; Taschieri, Silvio; Del Fabbro, Massimo; Corbella, Stefano; Rosen, Eyal.

In: Journal of Endodontics, Vol. 41, No. 11, 01.11.2015, p. 1818-1823.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tsesis, Igor ; Blazer, Tamar ; Ben-Izhack, Gil ; Taschieri, Silvio ; Del Fabbro, Massimo ; Corbella, Stefano ; Rosen, Eyal. / The precision of electronic apex locators in working length determination : A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. In: Journal of Endodontics. 2015 ; Vol. 41, No. 11. pp. 1818-1823.
@article{fc2b185d57ef4445a9ee1a9d57c918e2,
title = "The precision of electronic apex locators in working length determination: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature",
abstract = "Introduction This study aimed to evaluate the precision of electronic apex locators (EALs) in locating the apical constriction (AC) during a root canal treatment compared with a histologic evaluation of the AC as well as the effects of possible influencing factors by means of a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Methods A systematic search of the literature was performed to identify studies that histologically evaluated the precision of EALs in human teeth. The identified studies were subject to strict inclusion criteria followed by data extraction and meta-analysis. Results From 247 articles, 10 articles met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 1105 EAL measurements performed by 4 types of EALs: Root ZX (J Morita, Tokyo, Japan), Justy II (Hager & Werken GmbH & Co, Duisburg, Germany), Endy 5000 (Loser Co, Leverkusen, Germany), and Endox (Lysis Co, Milan, Italy). Root ZX, Justy II, and Endy 5000 were found to be significantly more accurate than Endox in determining the distance between the file tip and the apical constriction (P",
keywords = "Apical constriction, electronic apex locators, root canals, working length",
author = "Igor Tsesis and Tamar Blazer and Gil Ben-Izhack and Silvio Taschieri and {Del Fabbro}, Massimo and Stefano Corbella and Eyal Rosen",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.joen.2015.08.012",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "1818--1823",
journal = "Journal of Endodontics",
issn = "0099-2399",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The precision of electronic apex locators in working length determination

T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature

AU - Tsesis, Igor

AU - Blazer, Tamar

AU - Ben-Izhack, Gil

AU - Taschieri, Silvio

AU - Del Fabbro, Massimo

AU - Corbella, Stefano

AU - Rosen, Eyal

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - Introduction This study aimed to evaluate the precision of electronic apex locators (EALs) in locating the apical constriction (AC) during a root canal treatment compared with a histologic evaluation of the AC as well as the effects of possible influencing factors by means of a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Methods A systematic search of the literature was performed to identify studies that histologically evaluated the precision of EALs in human teeth. The identified studies were subject to strict inclusion criteria followed by data extraction and meta-analysis. Results From 247 articles, 10 articles met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 1105 EAL measurements performed by 4 types of EALs: Root ZX (J Morita, Tokyo, Japan), Justy II (Hager & Werken GmbH & Co, Duisburg, Germany), Endy 5000 (Loser Co, Leverkusen, Germany), and Endox (Lysis Co, Milan, Italy). Root ZX, Justy II, and Endy 5000 were found to be significantly more accurate than Endox in determining the distance between the file tip and the apical constriction (P

AB - Introduction This study aimed to evaluate the precision of electronic apex locators (EALs) in locating the apical constriction (AC) during a root canal treatment compared with a histologic evaluation of the AC as well as the effects of possible influencing factors by means of a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Methods A systematic search of the literature was performed to identify studies that histologically evaluated the precision of EALs in human teeth. The identified studies were subject to strict inclusion criteria followed by data extraction and meta-analysis. Results From 247 articles, 10 articles met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 1105 EAL measurements performed by 4 types of EALs: Root ZX (J Morita, Tokyo, Japan), Justy II (Hager & Werken GmbH & Co, Duisburg, Germany), Endy 5000 (Loser Co, Leverkusen, Germany), and Endox (Lysis Co, Milan, Italy). Root ZX, Justy II, and Endy 5000 were found to be significantly more accurate than Endox in determining the distance between the file tip and the apical constriction (P

KW - Apical constriction

KW - electronic apex locators

KW - root canals

KW - working length

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945545476&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945545476&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.joen.2015.08.012

DO - 10.1016/j.joen.2015.08.012

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 1818

EP - 1823

JO - Journal of Endodontics

JF - Journal of Endodontics

SN - 0099-2399

IS - 11

ER -