The Prevalence of Scoliosis in Spina Bifida Subpopulations: A Systematic Review

Arne Heyns, Stefano Negrini, Katrien Jansen, Pierre Moens, Sebastiaan Schelfaut, Koenraad Peers, Carlotte Kiekens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Prevalence of scoliosis within spina bifida subpopulations is important for diagnostics and therapeutic purposes. This review determined the prevalence of scoliosis within spina bifida subpopulations by means of a systematic literature review by using the following databases: Medline PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Pedro. All Dutch- and English-written literature using the MESH terms "spinal dysraphism," "neural tube defects," and "scoliosis" was analyzed using the exclusion criteria: animal studies, case reports, studies regarding the prevalence of spina bifida among patients with scoliosis, studies with inclusion of patients with scoliosis of less than 11 degrees without possibility to identify subgroups with scoliosis of greater than 10 degrees, studies without an own study group, articles comprising the same patient group as another article, neural tube defects besides spina bifida, and articles without specification of spina bifida subtype. It resulted in six articles, two concerning diastematomyelia (103 patients, 82 females and 21 males) and four about myelomeningocele (479 patients, 283 females and 196 males) with an overall weighted prevalence of scoliosis (20-degree Cobb angle cutoff) of 44.4% and 52.5%, respectively. It can be concluded that most studies have a lot of methodological flaws, so there is a need for further research with standardization of data collection to allow comparison of different data.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)848-854
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation
Issue number11
Publication statusPublished - Nov 1 2018

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation


Dive into the research topics of 'The Prevalence of Scoliosis in Spina Bifida Subpopulations: A Systematic Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this