The Regina Elena National Cancer Institute process of accreditation according to the standards of the Organisation of European Cancer Institutes

Stefano Canitano, Annunziata Di Turi, Giuseppina Caolo, Adriana C. Pignatelli, Elena Papa, Marta Branca, Marina Cerimele, Ruggero De Maria

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The accreditation process is, on the one hand, a tool used to homogenize procedures, rendering comparable and standardized processes of care, and on the other, a methodology employed to develop a culture of quality improvement. Although not yet proven by evidence-based studies that health outcomes improve as a result of an accreditation to excellence, it is undeniable that better control of healthcare processes results in better quality and safety of diagnostic and therapeutic pathways. The Regina Elena National Cancer Institute underwent the accreditation process in accordance with the standards criteria set by the Organisation of European Cancer Institutes (OECI), and it has recently completed the process, acquiring its designation as a Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC). This was an invaluable opportunity for the Regina Elena Institute to create a more cohesive environment, to widely establish a culture of quality, to implement an institutional information system, and to accelerate the process of patient involvement in strategic decisions. The steps of the process allowed us to evaluate the performance and the organization of the institute and put amendments in place designed to be adopted through 26 improvement actions. These actions regarded several aspects of the institute, including quality culture, information communication technology system, care, clinical trials unit, disease management team, nursing, and patient empowerment and involvement. Each area has a timeline. We chose to present the following 3 improvement actions: clinical trial center, computerized ambulatory medical record, and centrality of patient and humanization of clinical pathway.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S51-S54
JournalTumori
Volume101
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

National Cancer Institute (U.S.)
Accreditation
Patient Participation
Organizations
Neoplasms
Computerized Medical Records Systems
Clinical Trials
Team Nursing
Critical Pathways
Disease Management
Quality Improvement
Information Systems
Communication
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Technology
Delivery of Health Care
Safety
Health
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Accreditation
  • Improvement
  • Regina Elena experience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Cite this

The Regina Elena National Cancer Institute process of accreditation according to the standards of the Organisation of European Cancer Institutes. / Canitano, Stefano; Di Turi, Annunziata; Caolo, Giuseppina; Pignatelli, Adriana C.; Papa, Elena; Branca, Marta; Cerimele, Marina; De Maria, Ruggero.

In: Tumori, Vol. 101, 01.12.2015, p. S51-S54.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{83ec29582d29417a90c3692fef805182,
title = "The Regina Elena National Cancer Institute process of accreditation according to the standards of the Organisation of European Cancer Institutes",
abstract = "The accreditation process is, on the one hand, a tool used to homogenize procedures, rendering comparable and standardized processes of care, and on the other, a methodology employed to develop a culture of quality improvement. Although not yet proven by evidence-based studies that health outcomes improve as a result of an accreditation to excellence, it is undeniable that better control of healthcare processes results in better quality and safety of diagnostic and therapeutic pathways. The Regina Elena National Cancer Institute underwent the accreditation process in accordance with the standards criteria set by the Organisation of European Cancer Institutes (OECI), and it has recently completed the process, acquiring its designation as a Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC). This was an invaluable opportunity for the Regina Elena Institute to create a more cohesive environment, to widely establish a culture of quality, to implement an institutional information system, and to accelerate the process of patient involvement in strategic decisions. The steps of the process allowed us to evaluate the performance and the organization of the institute and put amendments in place designed to be adopted through 26 improvement actions. These actions regarded several aspects of the institute, including quality culture, information communication technology system, care, clinical trials unit, disease management team, nursing, and patient empowerment and involvement. Each area has a timeline. We chose to present the following 3 improvement actions: clinical trial center, computerized ambulatory medical record, and centrality of patient and humanization of clinical pathway.",
keywords = "Accreditation, Improvement, Regina Elena experience",
author = "Stefano Canitano and {Di Turi}, Annunziata and Giuseppina Caolo and Pignatelli, {Adriana C.} and Elena Papa and Marta Branca and Marina Cerimele and {De Maria}, Ruggero",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5301/tj.5000461",
language = "English",
volume = "101",
pages = "S51--S54",
journal = "Tumori",
issn = "0300-8916",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Regina Elena National Cancer Institute process of accreditation according to the standards of the Organisation of European Cancer Institutes

AU - Canitano, Stefano

AU - Di Turi, Annunziata

AU - Caolo, Giuseppina

AU - Pignatelli, Adriana C.

AU - Papa, Elena

AU - Branca, Marta

AU - Cerimele, Marina

AU - De Maria, Ruggero

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - The accreditation process is, on the one hand, a tool used to homogenize procedures, rendering comparable and standardized processes of care, and on the other, a methodology employed to develop a culture of quality improvement. Although not yet proven by evidence-based studies that health outcomes improve as a result of an accreditation to excellence, it is undeniable that better control of healthcare processes results in better quality and safety of diagnostic and therapeutic pathways. The Regina Elena National Cancer Institute underwent the accreditation process in accordance with the standards criteria set by the Organisation of European Cancer Institutes (OECI), and it has recently completed the process, acquiring its designation as a Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC). This was an invaluable opportunity for the Regina Elena Institute to create a more cohesive environment, to widely establish a culture of quality, to implement an institutional information system, and to accelerate the process of patient involvement in strategic decisions. The steps of the process allowed us to evaluate the performance and the organization of the institute and put amendments in place designed to be adopted through 26 improvement actions. These actions regarded several aspects of the institute, including quality culture, information communication technology system, care, clinical trials unit, disease management team, nursing, and patient empowerment and involvement. Each area has a timeline. We chose to present the following 3 improvement actions: clinical trial center, computerized ambulatory medical record, and centrality of patient and humanization of clinical pathway.

AB - The accreditation process is, on the one hand, a tool used to homogenize procedures, rendering comparable and standardized processes of care, and on the other, a methodology employed to develop a culture of quality improvement. Although not yet proven by evidence-based studies that health outcomes improve as a result of an accreditation to excellence, it is undeniable that better control of healthcare processes results in better quality and safety of diagnostic and therapeutic pathways. The Regina Elena National Cancer Institute underwent the accreditation process in accordance with the standards criteria set by the Organisation of European Cancer Institutes (OECI), and it has recently completed the process, acquiring its designation as a Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC). This was an invaluable opportunity for the Regina Elena Institute to create a more cohesive environment, to widely establish a culture of quality, to implement an institutional information system, and to accelerate the process of patient involvement in strategic decisions. The steps of the process allowed us to evaluate the performance and the organization of the institute and put amendments in place designed to be adopted through 26 improvement actions. These actions regarded several aspects of the institute, including quality culture, information communication technology system, care, clinical trials unit, disease management team, nursing, and patient empowerment and involvement. Each area has a timeline. We chose to present the following 3 improvement actions: clinical trial center, computerized ambulatory medical record, and centrality of patient and humanization of clinical pathway.

KW - Accreditation

KW - Improvement

KW - Regina Elena experience

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958612561&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958612561&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5301/tj.5000461

DO - 10.5301/tj.5000461

M3 - Article

C2 - 27096274

AN - SCOPUS:84958612561

VL - 101

SP - S51-S54

JO - Tumori

JF - Tumori

SN - 0300-8916

ER -