The role of cutaneous inputs during magnetic transcranial stimulation

Paolo M. Rossini, Franca Tecchio, Alessandro Sabato, Alessandro Finazzi-Agro, Patrizio Pasqualetti, Simone Rossi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Latency and amplitude characteristics of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and first dorsal interosseus (FDI) muscles were evaluated in 7 healthy volunteers via magnetic transcranial stimulation of the hemiscalp overlying contralateral motor areas. MEPs in complete relaxation and during contraction were recorded in two different experimental conditions: before and following anesthesia of median (sensory + motor) and radial (sensory) nerve fibers at wrist. This procedure induced a complete loss of skin sensation from dorsal and palmar aspects of the hand area 'enveloping' the FDI muscle. On the other hand, the skin overlying the ADM muscle, as well as the strength of ulnar nerve supplied muscles were spared. This selective sensory deprivation lead to the following short-term changes: the physiological latency 'jump' toward shorter values in contracted MEPs vs. relaxation was partially lost in the FDI (3.0 ± 1.4 ms in basal condition, 1.8 ± 1.1 ms after anesthesia, P = 0.028), while it was still clearly evident in the ADM (3.7 ± 0.9 ms and 3.3 ± 1.0 ms, respectively). Moreover, minor amplitude changes of MEPs during active contraction in the two muscles were detected: MEPs recorded from the FDI muscle were less potentiated during voluntary contraction than those recorded from the ADM muscle. The role of the cutaneous input in governing latency/amplitude characteristics of MEPs is discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1302-1309
Number of pages8
JournalMuscle and Nerve
Volume19
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1996

Fingerprint

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Motor Evoked Potentials
Muscles
Skin
Anesthesia
Sensory Deprivation
Radial Nerve
Ulnar Nerve
Motor Cortex
Wrist
Nerve Fibers
Healthy Volunteers
Hand

Keywords

  • anesthesia
  • motor cortex
  • sensory feedback
  • transcranial stimulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

The role of cutaneous inputs during magnetic transcranial stimulation. / Rossini, Paolo M.; Tecchio, Franca; Sabato, Alessandro; Finazzi-Agro, Alessandro; Pasqualetti, Patrizio; Rossi, Simone.

In: Muscle and Nerve, Vol. 19, No. 10, 1996, p. 1302-1309.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rossini, Paolo M. ; Tecchio, Franca ; Sabato, Alessandro ; Finazzi-Agro, Alessandro ; Pasqualetti, Patrizio ; Rossi, Simone. / The role of cutaneous inputs during magnetic transcranial stimulation. In: Muscle and Nerve. 1996 ; Vol. 19, No. 10. pp. 1302-1309.
@article{5754bd5f46004a73a37063b26043d19f,
title = "The role of cutaneous inputs during magnetic transcranial stimulation",
abstract = "Latency and amplitude characteristics of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and first dorsal interosseus (FDI) muscles were evaluated in 7 healthy volunteers via magnetic transcranial stimulation of the hemiscalp overlying contralateral motor areas. MEPs in complete relaxation and during contraction were recorded in two different experimental conditions: before and following anesthesia of median (sensory + motor) and radial (sensory) nerve fibers at wrist. This procedure induced a complete loss of skin sensation from dorsal and palmar aspects of the hand area 'enveloping' the FDI muscle. On the other hand, the skin overlying the ADM muscle, as well as the strength of ulnar nerve supplied muscles were spared. This selective sensory deprivation lead to the following short-term changes: the physiological latency 'jump' toward shorter values in contracted MEPs vs. relaxation was partially lost in the FDI (3.0 ± 1.4 ms in basal condition, 1.8 ± 1.1 ms after anesthesia, P = 0.028), while it was still clearly evident in the ADM (3.7 ± 0.9 ms and 3.3 ± 1.0 ms, respectively). Moreover, minor amplitude changes of MEPs during active contraction in the two muscles were detected: MEPs recorded from the FDI muscle were less potentiated during voluntary contraction than those recorded from the ADM muscle. The role of the cutaneous input in governing latency/amplitude characteristics of MEPs is discussed.",
keywords = "anesthesia, motor cortex, sensory feedback, transcranial stimulation",
author = "Rossini, {Paolo M.} and Franca Tecchio and Alessandro Sabato and Alessandro Finazzi-Agro and Patrizio Pasqualetti and Simone Rossi",
year = "1996",
doi = "10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199610)19:10<1302::AID-MUS7>3.0.CO;2-I",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "1302--1309",
journal = "Muscle and Nerve",
issn = "0148-639X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of cutaneous inputs during magnetic transcranial stimulation

AU - Rossini, Paolo M.

AU - Tecchio, Franca

AU - Sabato, Alessandro

AU - Finazzi-Agro, Alessandro

AU - Pasqualetti, Patrizio

AU - Rossi, Simone

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - Latency and amplitude characteristics of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and first dorsal interosseus (FDI) muscles were evaluated in 7 healthy volunteers via magnetic transcranial stimulation of the hemiscalp overlying contralateral motor areas. MEPs in complete relaxation and during contraction were recorded in two different experimental conditions: before and following anesthesia of median (sensory + motor) and radial (sensory) nerve fibers at wrist. This procedure induced a complete loss of skin sensation from dorsal and palmar aspects of the hand area 'enveloping' the FDI muscle. On the other hand, the skin overlying the ADM muscle, as well as the strength of ulnar nerve supplied muscles were spared. This selective sensory deprivation lead to the following short-term changes: the physiological latency 'jump' toward shorter values in contracted MEPs vs. relaxation was partially lost in the FDI (3.0 ± 1.4 ms in basal condition, 1.8 ± 1.1 ms after anesthesia, P = 0.028), while it was still clearly evident in the ADM (3.7 ± 0.9 ms and 3.3 ± 1.0 ms, respectively). Moreover, minor amplitude changes of MEPs during active contraction in the two muscles were detected: MEPs recorded from the FDI muscle were less potentiated during voluntary contraction than those recorded from the ADM muscle. The role of the cutaneous input in governing latency/amplitude characteristics of MEPs is discussed.

AB - Latency and amplitude characteristics of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and first dorsal interosseus (FDI) muscles were evaluated in 7 healthy volunteers via magnetic transcranial stimulation of the hemiscalp overlying contralateral motor areas. MEPs in complete relaxation and during contraction were recorded in two different experimental conditions: before and following anesthesia of median (sensory + motor) and radial (sensory) nerve fibers at wrist. This procedure induced a complete loss of skin sensation from dorsal and palmar aspects of the hand area 'enveloping' the FDI muscle. On the other hand, the skin overlying the ADM muscle, as well as the strength of ulnar nerve supplied muscles were spared. This selective sensory deprivation lead to the following short-term changes: the physiological latency 'jump' toward shorter values in contracted MEPs vs. relaxation was partially lost in the FDI (3.0 ± 1.4 ms in basal condition, 1.8 ± 1.1 ms after anesthesia, P = 0.028), while it was still clearly evident in the ADM (3.7 ± 0.9 ms and 3.3 ± 1.0 ms, respectively). Moreover, minor amplitude changes of MEPs during active contraction in the two muscles were detected: MEPs recorded from the FDI muscle were less potentiated during voluntary contraction than those recorded from the ADM muscle. The role of the cutaneous input in governing latency/amplitude characteristics of MEPs is discussed.

KW - anesthesia

KW - motor cortex

KW - sensory feedback

KW - transcranial stimulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029829947&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029829947&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199610)19:10<1302::AID-MUS7>3.0.CO;2-I

DO - 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199610)19:10<1302::AID-MUS7>3.0.CO;2-I

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 1302

EP - 1309

JO - Muscle and Nerve

JF - Muscle and Nerve

SN - 0148-639X

IS - 10

ER -