The role of patient involvement in the diagnostic process in internal medicine: A cognitive approach

Claudio Lucchiari, Gabriella Pravettoni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Much cognitive and clinical research has addressed clinical reasoning, pointing out that physicians often have difficulties in following a linear course when making accurate diagnoses. Some authors suspect that physicians make mistakes because they unknowingly fail to observe the laws of formal logic and that their reasoning becomes influenced by contextual factors. In this paper, we introduce some basic principles of the cognitive approach to medical decision making and we describe the cognitive balanced model. Then we discuss the relationship between construction of mental models, cognitive biases and patient involvement by the use of a clinical vignette. Medical decisions may be considered fundamentally biased since the use of judgment heuristics and a combination of cognitive-related and system-related factors limit physicians' rationality. While traditional understanding of clinical reasoning has failed to consider contextual factors, most techniques designed to avoid biases seem to fail in promoting sound and safer medical practice. In particular, we argue that an unbiased process requires the use of a cognitive balanced model, in which analytical and intuitive mind skills should be properly integrated. In order to improve medical decision making and thereby lessen incidence of adverse events, it is fundamental to include the patient perspective in a balanced model. Physicians and patients should improve their collective intelligence by sharing mental models within a framework of distributed intelligence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)411-415
Number of pages5
JournalEuropean Journal of Internal Medicine
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2013

Fingerprint

Patient Participation
Internal Medicine
Physicians
Intelligence
Incidence
Research
Clinical Decision-Making

Keywords

  • Cognitive biases
  • Diagnostic errors
  • Medical decision making
  • Overconfidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

The role of patient involvement in the diagnostic process in internal medicine : A cognitive approach. / Lucchiari, Claudio; Pravettoni, Gabriella.

In: European Journal of Internal Medicine, Vol. 24, No. 5, 07.2013, p. 411-415.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2686da17ff3240e081209fc088ac8ebf,
title = "The role of patient involvement in the diagnostic process in internal medicine: A cognitive approach",
abstract = "Much cognitive and clinical research has addressed clinical reasoning, pointing out that physicians often have difficulties in following a linear course when making accurate diagnoses. Some authors suspect that physicians make mistakes because they unknowingly fail to observe the laws of formal logic and that their reasoning becomes influenced by contextual factors. In this paper, we introduce some basic principles of the cognitive approach to medical decision making and we describe the cognitive balanced model. Then we discuss the relationship between construction of mental models, cognitive biases and patient involvement by the use of a clinical vignette. Medical decisions may be considered fundamentally biased since the use of judgment heuristics and a combination of cognitive-related and system-related factors limit physicians' rationality. While traditional understanding of clinical reasoning has failed to consider contextual factors, most techniques designed to avoid biases seem to fail in promoting sound and safer medical practice. In particular, we argue that an unbiased process requires the use of a cognitive balanced model, in which analytical and intuitive mind skills should be properly integrated. In order to improve medical decision making and thereby lessen incidence of adverse events, it is fundamental to include the patient perspective in a balanced model. Physicians and patients should improve their collective intelligence by sharing mental models within a framework of distributed intelligence.",
keywords = "Cognitive biases, Diagnostic errors, Medical decision making, Overconfidence",
author = "Claudio Lucchiari and Gabriella Pravettoni",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejim.2013.01.022",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "411--415",
journal = "European Journal of Internal Medicine",
issn = "0953-6205",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of patient involvement in the diagnostic process in internal medicine

T2 - A cognitive approach

AU - Lucchiari, Claudio

AU - Pravettoni, Gabriella

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - Much cognitive and clinical research has addressed clinical reasoning, pointing out that physicians often have difficulties in following a linear course when making accurate diagnoses. Some authors suspect that physicians make mistakes because they unknowingly fail to observe the laws of formal logic and that their reasoning becomes influenced by contextual factors. In this paper, we introduce some basic principles of the cognitive approach to medical decision making and we describe the cognitive balanced model. Then we discuss the relationship between construction of mental models, cognitive biases and patient involvement by the use of a clinical vignette. Medical decisions may be considered fundamentally biased since the use of judgment heuristics and a combination of cognitive-related and system-related factors limit physicians' rationality. While traditional understanding of clinical reasoning has failed to consider contextual factors, most techniques designed to avoid biases seem to fail in promoting sound and safer medical practice. In particular, we argue that an unbiased process requires the use of a cognitive balanced model, in which analytical and intuitive mind skills should be properly integrated. In order to improve medical decision making and thereby lessen incidence of adverse events, it is fundamental to include the patient perspective in a balanced model. Physicians and patients should improve their collective intelligence by sharing mental models within a framework of distributed intelligence.

AB - Much cognitive and clinical research has addressed clinical reasoning, pointing out that physicians often have difficulties in following a linear course when making accurate diagnoses. Some authors suspect that physicians make mistakes because they unknowingly fail to observe the laws of formal logic and that their reasoning becomes influenced by contextual factors. In this paper, we introduce some basic principles of the cognitive approach to medical decision making and we describe the cognitive balanced model. Then we discuss the relationship between construction of mental models, cognitive biases and patient involvement by the use of a clinical vignette. Medical decisions may be considered fundamentally biased since the use of judgment heuristics and a combination of cognitive-related and system-related factors limit physicians' rationality. While traditional understanding of clinical reasoning has failed to consider contextual factors, most techniques designed to avoid biases seem to fail in promoting sound and safer medical practice. In particular, we argue that an unbiased process requires the use of a cognitive balanced model, in which analytical and intuitive mind skills should be properly integrated. In order to improve medical decision making and thereby lessen incidence of adverse events, it is fundamental to include the patient perspective in a balanced model. Physicians and patients should improve their collective intelligence by sharing mental models within a framework of distributed intelligence.

KW - Cognitive biases

KW - Diagnostic errors

KW - Medical decision making

KW - Overconfidence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879123445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879123445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejim.2013.01.022

DO - 10.1016/j.ejim.2013.01.022

M3 - Article

C2 - 23422865

AN - SCOPUS:84879123445

VL - 24

SP - 411

EP - 415

JO - European Journal of Internal Medicine

JF - European Journal of Internal Medicine

SN - 0953-6205

IS - 5

ER -