The Role of Ultrasonography in the Evaluation of Abdominal Fat: Analysis of Technical and Methodological Issues

Alberto Bazzocchi; Giacomo Filonzi; Federico Ponti; Michele Amadori; Claudia Sassi; Eugenio Salizzoni; Ugo Albisinni; Giuseppe Battista

doi:10.1016/j.acra.2013.07.009

The Role of Ultrasonography in the Evaluation of Abdominal Fat: Analysis of Technical and Methodological Issues

Alberto Bazzocchi, Giacomo Filonzi, Federico Ponti, Michele Amadori, Claudia Sassi, Eugenio Salizzoni, Ugo Albisinni, Giuseppe Battista

Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives: Ultrasonography (US) is becoming popular for the assessment of adiposity, but no one has studied this tool in the light of its potential limitations. Our purpose was to investigate the impact of technical conditions on the evaluation of abdominal fat by US. Materials and Methods: Forty-five healthy males and 45 healthy females were consecutively enrolled in the study, randomly assigned to three groups equally distributed by sex, and examined accordingly to three technical points: fasting state (before and after meal [A]), breathing (expiration and inspiration [B]), and US equipment from different generations: 2003 and 1998 (C). Two blinded radiologists performed US in the these opposite conditions, acquiring five parameters representative of subcutaneous and visceral adiposity in two times. Student's t-test and Lin's correlation coefficient were used for statistical analysis to assess differences in the measures as well as in inter- and intra-observer agreements. Results: The maximum and the only statistically significant changes were observed for intra-abdominal fat thickness regarding fasting state and breathing (δ%=24.1±21.3 and δ%=9.2±20.4, respectively;. P

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1278-1285
Number of pages	8
Journal	Academic Radiology
Volume	20
Issue number	10
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2013.07.009
Publication status	Published - Oct 2013

Keywords

Adiposity
Body composition
Methods
Reproducibility of results
Ultrasonography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Access to Document

10.1016/j.acra.2013.07.009

Cite this

The Role of Ultrasonography in the Evaluation of Abdominal Fat : Analysis of Technical and Methodological Issues. / Bazzocchi, Alberto; Filonzi, Giacomo; Ponti, Federico; Amadori, Michele; Sassi, Claudia; Salizzoni, Eugenio; Albisinni, Ugo; Battista, Giuseppe.

In: Academic Radiology, Vol. 20, No. 10, 10.2013, p. 1278-1285.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

@article{239577f07cd841fda85779b3d489299d,

title = "The Role of Ultrasonography in the Evaluation of Abdominal Fat: Analysis of Technical and Methodological Issues",

abstract = "Rationale and Objectives: Ultrasonography (US) is becoming popular for the assessment of adiposity, but no one has studied this tool in the light of its potential limitations. Our purpose was to investigate the impact of technical conditions on the evaluation of abdominal fat by US. Materials and Methods: Forty-five healthy males and 45 healthy females were consecutively enrolled in the study, randomly assigned to three groups equally distributed by sex, and examined accordingly to three technical points: fasting state (before and after meal [A]), breathing (expiration and inspiration [B]), and US equipment from different generations: 2003 and 1998 (C). Two blinded radiologists performed US in the these opposite conditions, acquiring five parameters representative of subcutaneous and visceral adiposity in two times. Student's t-test and Lin's correlation coefficient were used for statistical analysis to assess differences in the measures as well as in inter- and intra-observer agreements. Results: The maximum and the only statistically significant changes were observed for intra-abdominal fat thickness regarding fasting state and breathing (δ%=24.1±21.3 and δ%=9.2±20.4, respectively;. P",

keywords = "Adiposity, Body composition, Methods, Reproducibility of results, Ultrasonography",

author = "Alberto Bazzocchi and Giacomo Filonzi and Federico Ponti and Michele Amadori and Claudia Sassi and Eugenio Salizzoni and Ugo Albisinni and Giuseppe Battista",

year = "2013",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1016/j.acra.2013.07.009",

language = "English",

volume = "20",

pages = "1278--1285",

journal = "Academic Radiology",

issn = "1076-6332",

publisher = "Elsevier USA",

number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Role of Ultrasonography in the Evaluation of Abdominal Fat

T2 - Analysis of Technical and Methodological Issues

AU - Bazzocchi, Alberto

AU - Filonzi, Giacomo

AU - Ponti, Federico

AU - Amadori, Michele

AU - Sassi, Claudia

AU - Salizzoni, Eugenio

AU - Albisinni, Ugo

AU - Battista, Giuseppe

PY - 2013/10

Y1 - 2013/10

N2 - Rationale and Objectives: Ultrasonography (US) is becoming popular for the assessment of adiposity, but no one has studied this tool in the light of its potential limitations. Our purpose was to investigate the impact of technical conditions on the evaluation of abdominal fat by US. Materials and Methods: Forty-five healthy males and 45 healthy females were consecutively enrolled in the study, randomly assigned to three groups equally distributed by sex, and examined accordingly to three technical points: fasting state (before and after meal [A]), breathing (expiration and inspiration [B]), and US equipment from different generations: 2003 and 1998 (C). Two blinded radiologists performed US in the these opposite conditions, acquiring five parameters representative of subcutaneous and visceral adiposity in two times. Student's t-test and Lin's correlation coefficient were used for statistical analysis to assess differences in the measures as well as in inter- and intra-observer agreements. Results: The maximum and the only statistically significant changes were observed for intra-abdominal fat thickness regarding fasting state and breathing (δ%=24.1±21.3 and δ%=9.2±20.4, respectively;. P

AB - Rationale and Objectives: Ultrasonography (US) is becoming popular for the assessment of adiposity, but no one has studied this tool in the light of its potential limitations. Our purpose was to investigate the impact of technical conditions on the evaluation of abdominal fat by US. Materials and Methods: Forty-five healthy males and 45 healthy females were consecutively enrolled in the study, randomly assigned to three groups equally distributed by sex, and examined accordingly to three technical points: fasting state (before and after meal [A]), breathing (expiration and inspiration [B]), and US equipment from different generations: 2003 and 1998 (C). Two blinded radiologists performed US in the these opposite conditions, acquiring five parameters representative of subcutaneous and visceral adiposity in two times. Student's t-test and Lin's correlation coefficient were used for statistical analysis to assess differences in the measures as well as in inter- and intra-observer agreements. Results: The maximum and the only statistically significant changes were observed for intra-abdominal fat thickness regarding fasting state and breathing (δ%=24.1±21.3 and δ%=9.2±20.4, respectively;. P

KW - Adiposity

KW - Body composition

KW - Methods

KW - Reproducibility of results

KW - Ultrasonography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883493616&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883493616&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.acra.2013.07.009

DO - 10.1016/j.acra.2013.07.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 24029060

AN - SCOPUS:84883493616

VL - 20

SP - 1278

EP - 1285

JO - Academic Radiology

JF - Academic Radiology

SN - 1076-6332

IS - 10

ER -

The Role of Ultrasonography in the Evaluation of Abdominal Fat: Analysis of Technical and Methodological Issues

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this