The safety and acceptability of an electric toothbrush on peri-implant mucosa in patients with oral implants in aesthetic areas: a prospective cohort study.

Giulio Rasperini, Gaia Pellegrini, Antonia Cortella, Isabella Rocchietta, Dario Consonni, Massimo Simion

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this cohort study was to evaluate the safety and the acceptability of an electric toothbrush used on the peri-implant mucosa of implants placed in the aesthetic area. METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients rehabilitated with implants positioned in the maxillary aesthetic area were recruited. Implants had to be restored at least 6 months prior to baseline. At baseline, subjects were provided with Oral-B Professional Care 7000 and received appropriate instructions to brush twice a day over a 12-month period. Papillary bleeding index, recession and probing depth were measured at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: Ninety-eight (98) patients completed the study. There was an overall reduction of recession (mean 0.2 mm) of borderline statistical significance. All of the changes occurred at the first followup visit (P=0.09) and persisted thereafter. The statistical analyses regarding the probing depth found a highly significant decrease over time (mean 0.3 mm). The bleeding score showed a gradual decrease over time, with a reduction at 12 months by more than half (0.65) in comparison with the baseline (1.50) and was shown to be highly significant (Wilcoxon sign-rank test: P <0.001). No patient showed adverse effects such as ulcerations or desquamation. A high score of satisfaction by the patients using the electric toothbrush was reported (94% would continue to use it). CONCLUSION: The electric toothbrush Oral B Professional Care 7000 appears to be safe for patients with fixed prosthesis on implants in aesthetic areas. Successive randomised clinical trials are needed to compare this instrument with other therapeutic devices for mechanical plaque control.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)221-228
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean journal of oral implantology
Volume1
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2008

Fingerprint

Esthetics
Mucous Membrane
Cohort Studies
Prospective Studies
Safety
Hemorrhage
Nonparametric Statistics
Patient Satisfaction
Prostheses and Implants
Randomized Controlled Trials
Equipment and Supplies
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The safety and acceptability of an electric toothbrush on peri-implant mucosa in patients with oral implants in aesthetic areas : a prospective cohort study. / Rasperini, Giulio; Pellegrini, Gaia; Cortella, Antonia; Rocchietta, Isabella; Consonni, Dario; Simion, Massimo.

In: European journal of oral implantology, Vol. 1, No. 3, 09.2008, p. 221-228.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rasperini, Giulio ; Pellegrini, Gaia ; Cortella, Antonia ; Rocchietta, Isabella ; Consonni, Dario ; Simion, Massimo. / The safety and acceptability of an electric toothbrush on peri-implant mucosa in patients with oral implants in aesthetic areas : a prospective cohort study. In: European journal of oral implantology. 2008 ; Vol. 1, No. 3. pp. 221-228.
@article{d60535684826447fa49991d3e7d8c929,
title = "The safety and acceptability of an electric toothbrush on peri-implant mucosa in patients with oral implants in aesthetic areas: a prospective cohort study.",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: The aim of this cohort study was to evaluate the safety and the acceptability of an electric toothbrush used on the peri-implant mucosa of implants placed in the aesthetic area. METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients rehabilitated with implants positioned in the maxillary aesthetic area were recruited. Implants had to be restored at least 6 months prior to baseline. At baseline, subjects were provided with Oral-B Professional Care 7000 and received appropriate instructions to brush twice a day over a 12-month period. Papillary bleeding index, recession and probing depth were measured at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: Ninety-eight (98) patients completed the study. There was an overall reduction of recession (mean 0.2 mm) of borderline statistical significance. All of the changes occurred at the first followup visit (P=0.09) and persisted thereafter. The statistical analyses regarding the probing depth found a highly significant decrease over time (mean 0.3 mm). The bleeding score showed a gradual decrease over time, with a reduction at 12 months by more than half (0.65) in comparison with the baseline (1.50) and was shown to be highly significant (Wilcoxon sign-rank test: P <0.001). No patient showed adverse effects such as ulcerations or desquamation. A high score of satisfaction by the patients using the electric toothbrush was reported (94{\%} would continue to use it). CONCLUSION: The electric toothbrush Oral B Professional Care 7000 appears to be safe for patients with fixed prosthesis on implants in aesthetic areas. Successive randomised clinical trials are needed to compare this instrument with other therapeutic devices for mechanical plaque control.",
author = "Giulio Rasperini and Gaia Pellegrini and Antonia Cortella and Isabella Rocchietta and Dario Consonni and Massimo Simion",
year = "2008",
month = "9",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "221--228",
journal = "European journal of oral implantology",
issn = "1756-2406",
publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Company",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The safety and acceptability of an electric toothbrush on peri-implant mucosa in patients with oral implants in aesthetic areas

T2 - a prospective cohort study.

AU - Rasperini, Giulio

AU - Pellegrini, Gaia

AU - Cortella, Antonia

AU - Rocchietta, Isabella

AU - Consonni, Dario

AU - Simion, Massimo

PY - 2008/9

Y1 - 2008/9

N2 - OBJECTIVES: The aim of this cohort study was to evaluate the safety and the acceptability of an electric toothbrush used on the peri-implant mucosa of implants placed in the aesthetic area. METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients rehabilitated with implants positioned in the maxillary aesthetic area were recruited. Implants had to be restored at least 6 months prior to baseline. At baseline, subjects were provided with Oral-B Professional Care 7000 and received appropriate instructions to brush twice a day over a 12-month period. Papillary bleeding index, recession and probing depth were measured at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: Ninety-eight (98) patients completed the study. There was an overall reduction of recession (mean 0.2 mm) of borderline statistical significance. All of the changes occurred at the first followup visit (P=0.09) and persisted thereafter. The statistical analyses regarding the probing depth found a highly significant decrease over time (mean 0.3 mm). The bleeding score showed a gradual decrease over time, with a reduction at 12 months by more than half (0.65) in comparison with the baseline (1.50) and was shown to be highly significant (Wilcoxon sign-rank test: P <0.001). No patient showed adverse effects such as ulcerations or desquamation. A high score of satisfaction by the patients using the electric toothbrush was reported (94% would continue to use it). CONCLUSION: The electric toothbrush Oral B Professional Care 7000 appears to be safe for patients with fixed prosthesis on implants in aesthetic areas. Successive randomised clinical trials are needed to compare this instrument with other therapeutic devices for mechanical plaque control.

AB - OBJECTIVES: The aim of this cohort study was to evaluate the safety and the acceptability of an electric toothbrush used on the peri-implant mucosa of implants placed in the aesthetic area. METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients rehabilitated with implants positioned in the maxillary aesthetic area were recruited. Implants had to be restored at least 6 months prior to baseline. At baseline, subjects were provided with Oral-B Professional Care 7000 and received appropriate instructions to brush twice a day over a 12-month period. Papillary bleeding index, recession and probing depth were measured at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: Ninety-eight (98) patients completed the study. There was an overall reduction of recession (mean 0.2 mm) of borderline statistical significance. All of the changes occurred at the first followup visit (P=0.09) and persisted thereafter. The statistical analyses regarding the probing depth found a highly significant decrease over time (mean 0.3 mm). The bleeding score showed a gradual decrease over time, with a reduction at 12 months by more than half (0.65) in comparison with the baseline (1.50) and was shown to be highly significant (Wilcoxon sign-rank test: P <0.001). No patient showed adverse effects such as ulcerations or desquamation. A high score of satisfaction by the patients using the electric toothbrush was reported (94% would continue to use it). CONCLUSION: The electric toothbrush Oral B Professional Care 7000 appears to be safe for patients with fixed prosthesis on implants in aesthetic areas. Successive randomised clinical trials are needed to compare this instrument with other therapeutic devices for mechanical plaque control.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953248818&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953248818&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 20467624

AN - SCOPUS:77953248818

VL - 1

SP - 221

EP - 228

JO - European journal of oral implantology

JF - European journal of oral implantology

SN - 1756-2406

IS - 3

ER -