The status of consonants and vowels in phonological assembly: Testing the two-cycles model with Italian

Lucia Colombo, Marco Zorzi, Roberto Cubelli, Cristina Brivio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent studies by Berent and Perfetti (1995) and Lee, Rayner, and Pollatsek (2001) have shown a processing priority of consonants over vowels in tasks like backward masking and reading, respectively. One possible explanation for this advantage of consonants is in terms of the specific characteristics of the English spelling (i.e., a great inconsistency in the spelling-sound relations for vowels), and therefore is not predicted for a language, like Italian, with a transparent orthography. The aim of the present experiments was to investigate the consonant advantage in Italian with the backward masking paradigm. The first two experiments, with a perceptual identification and a naming task, showed a masking reduction effect for masks sharing vowels with the target at the shortest SOAs, in addition to a pseudohomophone advantage as compared to the control condition. In the third experiment, where a lexical decision task was used, the advantage of the mask sharing vowels disappeared. The fourth experiment was a replication of Experiment 1 with different materials. Overall, the results suggest that the advantage of consonants can only be found in English, whereas in Italian, for which the computation of phonology of vowels and consonants is similar, no effect is apparent. Thus, the processing priority for consonants seems to depend on the inconsistencies of vowel phonology in English.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)405-433
Number of pages29
JournalEuropean Journal of Cognitive Psychology
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2003

Fingerprint

Masks
Reading
Language

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

The status of consonants and vowels in phonological assembly : Testing the two-cycles model with Italian. / Colombo, Lucia; Zorzi, Marco; Cubelli, Roberto; Brivio, Cristina.

In: European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 15, No. 3, 07.2003, p. 405-433.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Colombo, Lucia ; Zorzi, Marco ; Cubelli, Roberto ; Brivio, Cristina. / The status of consonants and vowels in phonological assembly : Testing the two-cycles model with Italian. In: European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 2003 ; Vol. 15, No. 3. pp. 405-433.
@article{f66a8e6f97e340dd9d5da8780790bd0d,
title = "The status of consonants and vowels in phonological assembly: Testing the two-cycles model with Italian",
abstract = "Recent studies by Berent and Perfetti (1995) and Lee, Rayner, and Pollatsek (2001) have shown a processing priority of consonants over vowels in tasks like backward masking and reading, respectively. One possible explanation for this advantage of consonants is in terms of the specific characteristics of the English spelling (i.e., a great inconsistency in the spelling-sound relations for vowels), and therefore is not predicted for a language, like Italian, with a transparent orthography. The aim of the present experiments was to investigate the consonant advantage in Italian with the backward masking paradigm. The first two experiments, with a perceptual identification and a naming task, showed a masking reduction effect for masks sharing vowels with the target at the shortest SOAs, in addition to a pseudohomophone advantage as compared to the control condition. In the third experiment, where a lexical decision task was used, the advantage of the mask sharing vowels disappeared. The fourth experiment was a replication of Experiment 1 with different materials. Overall, the results suggest that the advantage of consonants can only be found in English, whereas in Italian, for which the computation of phonology of vowels and consonants is similar, no effect is apparent. Thus, the processing priority for consonants seems to depend on the inconsistencies of vowel phonology in English.",
author = "Lucia Colombo and Marco Zorzi and Roberto Cubelli and Cristina Brivio",
year = "2003",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1080/09541440303605",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "405--433",
journal = "European Journal of Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "0954-1446",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The status of consonants and vowels in phonological assembly

T2 - Testing the two-cycles model with Italian

AU - Colombo, Lucia

AU - Zorzi, Marco

AU - Cubelli, Roberto

AU - Brivio, Cristina

PY - 2003/7

Y1 - 2003/7

N2 - Recent studies by Berent and Perfetti (1995) and Lee, Rayner, and Pollatsek (2001) have shown a processing priority of consonants over vowels in tasks like backward masking and reading, respectively. One possible explanation for this advantage of consonants is in terms of the specific characteristics of the English spelling (i.e., a great inconsistency in the spelling-sound relations for vowels), and therefore is not predicted for a language, like Italian, with a transparent orthography. The aim of the present experiments was to investigate the consonant advantage in Italian with the backward masking paradigm. The first two experiments, with a perceptual identification and a naming task, showed a masking reduction effect for masks sharing vowels with the target at the shortest SOAs, in addition to a pseudohomophone advantage as compared to the control condition. In the third experiment, where a lexical decision task was used, the advantage of the mask sharing vowels disappeared. The fourth experiment was a replication of Experiment 1 with different materials. Overall, the results suggest that the advantage of consonants can only be found in English, whereas in Italian, for which the computation of phonology of vowels and consonants is similar, no effect is apparent. Thus, the processing priority for consonants seems to depend on the inconsistencies of vowel phonology in English.

AB - Recent studies by Berent and Perfetti (1995) and Lee, Rayner, and Pollatsek (2001) have shown a processing priority of consonants over vowels in tasks like backward masking and reading, respectively. One possible explanation for this advantage of consonants is in terms of the specific characteristics of the English spelling (i.e., a great inconsistency in the spelling-sound relations for vowels), and therefore is not predicted for a language, like Italian, with a transparent orthography. The aim of the present experiments was to investigate the consonant advantage in Italian with the backward masking paradigm. The first two experiments, with a perceptual identification and a naming task, showed a masking reduction effect for masks sharing vowels with the target at the shortest SOAs, in addition to a pseudohomophone advantage as compared to the control condition. In the third experiment, where a lexical decision task was used, the advantage of the mask sharing vowels disappeared. The fourth experiment was a replication of Experiment 1 with different materials. Overall, the results suggest that the advantage of consonants can only be found in English, whereas in Italian, for which the computation of phonology of vowels and consonants is similar, no effect is apparent. Thus, the processing priority for consonants seems to depend on the inconsistencies of vowel phonology in English.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037663271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037663271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09541440303605

DO - 10.1080/09541440303605

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0037663271

VL - 15

SP - 405

EP - 433

JO - European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

JF - European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

SN - 0954-1446

IS - 3

ER -