The uncertain fate of ovaries at the time of hysterectomy

M. Giai, R. Ponzone, R. Roagna, N. Biglia, L. Sgro, P. Sismondi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this review was to analyse the current opinions on the practice of prophylactic oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy according to the patient's age. Methods: All publications regarding the role of prophylactic oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy indexed on CANCER-CD TIM from 1984 to 1994 have been revised. Recent data on the reduction of ovarian cancer incidence and on the risk/benefit assessment of hormonal deprivation compared to hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) following ovarian ablation were also examined. Results: Prophylactic oophorectomy is considered the most effective way of avoiding ovarian cancer and it is widely performed in post-menopausal women. Uncertainty remains for younger women: the use of HRT allows to overcome most part of unfavourable metabolic effects caused by the early hormonal deprivation in those patients who underwent oophorectomy. Furthermore, preserved ovaries do not ensure their regular activity after hysterectomy and sometimes have to be removed due to the 'residual ovary syndrome'. Nevertheless, a good compliance with estrogen therapy is necessary to avoid that the drawbacks of oophorectomy (higher incidence of coronary heart disease and osteoporosis) exceed the benefits (lower incidence of ovarian and breast cancer). Conclusions: There is general agreement on preserving ovaries in women before 40 years and performing prophylactic oophorectomy after 50 years of age at the time of hysterectomy. For patients in the fifth decade of life, risk factors for ovarian cancer and the effectiveness of HRT should be considered; any decision must be taken in accordance with patient's opinion, adequately informed of the potential risks and benefits of therapeutic options.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-84
Number of pages10
JournalItalian Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
Volume6
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1994

Fingerprint

Ovariectomy
Hysterectomy
Ovary
Ovarian Neoplasms
Incidence
Therapeutics
Osteoporosis
Uncertainty
Coronary Disease
Publications
Estrogens
Breast Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Hysterectomy
  • Oophorectomy
  • Ovarian cancer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

Giai, M., Ponzone, R., Roagna, R., Biglia, N., Sgro, L., & Sismondi, P. (1994). The uncertain fate of ovaries at the time of hysterectomy. Italian Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 6(4), 75-84.

The uncertain fate of ovaries at the time of hysterectomy. / Giai, M.; Ponzone, R.; Roagna, R.; Biglia, N.; Sgro, L.; Sismondi, P.

In: Italian Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Vol. 6, No. 4, 1994, p. 75-84.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Giai, M, Ponzone, R, Roagna, R, Biglia, N, Sgro, L & Sismondi, P 1994, 'The uncertain fate of ovaries at the time of hysterectomy', Italian Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 75-84.
Giai, M. ; Ponzone, R. ; Roagna, R. ; Biglia, N. ; Sgro, L. ; Sismondi, P. / The uncertain fate of ovaries at the time of hysterectomy. In: Italian Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 1994 ; Vol. 6, No. 4. pp. 75-84.
@article{377eea363df249d7afac972d1821e8c6,
title = "The uncertain fate of ovaries at the time of hysterectomy",
abstract = "Objective: The aim of this review was to analyse the current opinions on the practice of prophylactic oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy according to the patient's age. Methods: All publications regarding the role of prophylactic oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy indexed on CANCER-CD TIM from 1984 to 1994 have been revised. Recent data on the reduction of ovarian cancer incidence and on the risk/benefit assessment of hormonal deprivation compared to hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) following ovarian ablation were also examined. Results: Prophylactic oophorectomy is considered the most effective way of avoiding ovarian cancer and it is widely performed in post-menopausal women. Uncertainty remains for younger women: the use of HRT allows to overcome most part of unfavourable metabolic effects caused by the early hormonal deprivation in those patients who underwent oophorectomy. Furthermore, preserved ovaries do not ensure their regular activity after hysterectomy and sometimes have to be removed due to the 'residual ovary syndrome'. Nevertheless, a good compliance with estrogen therapy is necessary to avoid that the drawbacks of oophorectomy (higher incidence of coronary heart disease and osteoporosis) exceed the benefits (lower incidence of ovarian and breast cancer). Conclusions: There is general agreement on preserving ovaries in women before 40 years and performing prophylactic oophorectomy after 50 years of age at the time of hysterectomy. For patients in the fifth decade of life, risk factors for ovarian cancer and the effectiveness of HRT should be considered; any decision must be taken in accordance with patient's opinion, adequately informed of the potential risks and benefits of therapeutic options.",
keywords = "Hysterectomy, Oophorectomy, Ovarian cancer",
author = "M. Giai and R. Ponzone and R. Roagna and N. Biglia and L. Sgro and P. Sismondi",
year = "1994",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "75--84",
journal = "Italian Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics",
issn = "1121-8339",
publisher = "CIC Edizioni Internazionali s.r.l.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The uncertain fate of ovaries at the time of hysterectomy

AU - Giai, M.

AU - Ponzone, R.

AU - Roagna, R.

AU - Biglia, N.

AU - Sgro, L.

AU - Sismondi, P.

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - Objective: The aim of this review was to analyse the current opinions on the practice of prophylactic oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy according to the patient's age. Methods: All publications regarding the role of prophylactic oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy indexed on CANCER-CD TIM from 1984 to 1994 have been revised. Recent data on the reduction of ovarian cancer incidence and on the risk/benefit assessment of hormonal deprivation compared to hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) following ovarian ablation were also examined. Results: Prophylactic oophorectomy is considered the most effective way of avoiding ovarian cancer and it is widely performed in post-menopausal women. Uncertainty remains for younger women: the use of HRT allows to overcome most part of unfavourable metabolic effects caused by the early hormonal deprivation in those patients who underwent oophorectomy. Furthermore, preserved ovaries do not ensure their regular activity after hysterectomy and sometimes have to be removed due to the 'residual ovary syndrome'. Nevertheless, a good compliance with estrogen therapy is necessary to avoid that the drawbacks of oophorectomy (higher incidence of coronary heart disease and osteoporosis) exceed the benefits (lower incidence of ovarian and breast cancer). Conclusions: There is general agreement on preserving ovaries in women before 40 years and performing prophylactic oophorectomy after 50 years of age at the time of hysterectomy. For patients in the fifth decade of life, risk factors for ovarian cancer and the effectiveness of HRT should be considered; any decision must be taken in accordance with patient's opinion, adequately informed of the potential risks and benefits of therapeutic options.

AB - Objective: The aim of this review was to analyse the current opinions on the practice of prophylactic oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy according to the patient's age. Methods: All publications regarding the role of prophylactic oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy indexed on CANCER-CD TIM from 1984 to 1994 have been revised. Recent data on the reduction of ovarian cancer incidence and on the risk/benefit assessment of hormonal deprivation compared to hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) following ovarian ablation were also examined. Results: Prophylactic oophorectomy is considered the most effective way of avoiding ovarian cancer and it is widely performed in post-menopausal women. Uncertainty remains for younger women: the use of HRT allows to overcome most part of unfavourable metabolic effects caused by the early hormonal deprivation in those patients who underwent oophorectomy. Furthermore, preserved ovaries do not ensure their regular activity after hysterectomy and sometimes have to be removed due to the 'residual ovary syndrome'. Nevertheless, a good compliance with estrogen therapy is necessary to avoid that the drawbacks of oophorectomy (higher incidence of coronary heart disease and osteoporosis) exceed the benefits (lower incidence of ovarian and breast cancer). Conclusions: There is general agreement on preserving ovaries in women before 40 years and performing prophylactic oophorectomy after 50 years of age at the time of hysterectomy. For patients in the fifth decade of life, risk factors for ovarian cancer and the effectiveness of HRT should be considered; any decision must be taken in accordance with patient's opinion, adequately informed of the potential risks and benefits of therapeutic options.

KW - Hysterectomy

KW - Oophorectomy

KW - Ovarian cancer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028650141&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028650141&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 75

EP - 84

JO - Italian Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics

JF - Italian Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics

SN - 1121-8339

IS - 4

ER -