The value of four-detector row spiral computed tomography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism

Mario Vigo, Raffaele Pesavento, Carlo Bova, Fernando Porro, Angelo Ghirarduzzi, Mario Bazzan, Roberta Polverosi, Michela Frulla, Alfonso Noto, Roberto Castelli, Franco Giovanardi, Federico Angelini, Antonio Pagnan, Paolo Prandoni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Although spiral computed tomography (CT) is being used increasingly as the first-line imaging procedure in the diagnostic workup of patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism (PE), the diagnostic value of negative findings, at least when using the four-detector row scanners, is still controversial. A total of 702 consecutive patients with clinical symptoms suggestive of PE underwent four-slice CT. Patients with negative findings received the determination of D-dimer. Those with positive D-dimer underwent further diagnostic workup to confirm or rule out the diagnosis of PE. Those with negative D-dimer were followed-up to 6 months to detect the development of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE). The CT test was interpreted as negative in 536 patients (76.3%). These patients had the D-dimer determination, which was positive in 279 and negative in the remaining 257 patients. Of the former, PE subsequently was documented in 55 patients (19.7%). Of the latter, symptomatic VTE in the follow-up period developed in three patients (1.17%; 95% confidence interval, 0.24 to 3.38%). In conclusion, when using the four-detector row, the negative predictive value of CT findings in patients with clinically suspected PE and positive D-dimer is low. In contrast, it is safe to withhold anticoagulation from patients with negative findings and negative D-dimer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)831-837
Number of pages7
JournalSeminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis
Volume32
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2006

Fingerprint

Spiral Computed Tomography
Pulmonary Embolism
Venous Thromboembolism
Tomography
fibrin fragment D
Confidence Intervals

Keywords

  • D-dimer
  • Diagnosis
  • Pulmonary embolism
  • Spiral computed tomography
  • Venous thromboembolism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Vigo, M., Pesavento, R., Bova, C., Porro, F., Ghirarduzzi, A., Bazzan, M., ... Prandoni, P. (2006). The value of four-detector row spiral computed tomography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, 32(8), 831-837. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-955470

The value of four-detector row spiral computed tomography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. / Vigo, Mario; Pesavento, Raffaele; Bova, Carlo; Porro, Fernando; Ghirarduzzi, Angelo; Bazzan, Mario; Polverosi, Roberta; Frulla, Michela; Noto, Alfonso; Castelli, Roberto; Giovanardi, Franco; Angelini, Federico; Pagnan, Antonio; Prandoni, Paolo.

In: Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Vol. 32, No. 8, 11.2006, p. 831-837.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vigo, M, Pesavento, R, Bova, C, Porro, F, Ghirarduzzi, A, Bazzan, M, Polverosi, R, Frulla, M, Noto, A, Castelli, R, Giovanardi, F, Angelini, F, Pagnan, A & Prandoni, P 2006, 'The value of four-detector row spiral computed tomography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism', Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 831-837. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-955470
Vigo, Mario ; Pesavento, Raffaele ; Bova, Carlo ; Porro, Fernando ; Ghirarduzzi, Angelo ; Bazzan, Mario ; Polverosi, Roberta ; Frulla, Michela ; Noto, Alfonso ; Castelli, Roberto ; Giovanardi, Franco ; Angelini, Federico ; Pagnan, Antonio ; Prandoni, Paolo. / The value of four-detector row spiral computed tomography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. In: Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis. 2006 ; Vol. 32, No. 8. pp. 831-837.
@article{50abb9523dcd442984dcb09bbd453ed2,
title = "The value of four-detector row spiral computed tomography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism",
abstract = "Although spiral computed tomography (CT) is being used increasingly as the first-line imaging procedure in the diagnostic workup of patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism (PE), the diagnostic value of negative findings, at least when using the four-detector row scanners, is still controversial. A total of 702 consecutive patients with clinical symptoms suggestive of PE underwent four-slice CT. Patients with negative findings received the determination of D-dimer. Those with positive D-dimer underwent further diagnostic workup to confirm or rule out the diagnosis of PE. Those with negative D-dimer were followed-up to 6 months to detect the development of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE). The CT test was interpreted as negative in 536 patients (76.3{\%}). These patients had the D-dimer determination, which was positive in 279 and negative in the remaining 257 patients. Of the former, PE subsequently was documented in 55 patients (19.7{\%}). Of the latter, symptomatic VTE in the follow-up period developed in three patients (1.17{\%}; 95{\%} confidence interval, 0.24 to 3.38{\%}). In conclusion, when using the four-detector row, the negative predictive value of CT findings in patients with clinically suspected PE and positive D-dimer is low. In contrast, it is safe to withhold anticoagulation from patients with negative findings and negative D-dimer.",
keywords = "D-dimer, Diagnosis, Pulmonary embolism, Spiral computed tomography, Venous thromboembolism",
author = "Mario Vigo and Raffaele Pesavento and Carlo Bova and Fernando Porro and Angelo Ghirarduzzi and Mario Bazzan and Roberta Polverosi and Michela Frulla and Alfonso Noto and Roberto Castelli and Franco Giovanardi and Federico Angelini and Antonio Pagnan and Paolo Prandoni",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1055/s-2006-955470",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "831--837",
journal = "Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis",
issn = "0094-6176",
publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The value of four-detector row spiral computed tomography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism

AU - Vigo, Mario

AU - Pesavento, Raffaele

AU - Bova, Carlo

AU - Porro, Fernando

AU - Ghirarduzzi, Angelo

AU - Bazzan, Mario

AU - Polverosi, Roberta

AU - Frulla, Michela

AU - Noto, Alfonso

AU - Castelli, Roberto

AU - Giovanardi, Franco

AU - Angelini, Federico

AU - Pagnan, Antonio

AU - Prandoni, Paolo

PY - 2006/11

Y1 - 2006/11

N2 - Although spiral computed tomography (CT) is being used increasingly as the first-line imaging procedure in the diagnostic workup of patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism (PE), the diagnostic value of negative findings, at least when using the four-detector row scanners, is still controversial. A total of 702 consecutive patients with clinical symptoms suggestive of PE underwent four-slice CT. Patients with negative findings received the determination of D-dimer. Those with positive D-dimer underwent further diagnostic workup to confirm or rule out the diagnosis of PE. Those with negative D-dimer were followed-up to 6 months to detect the development of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE). The CT test was interpreted as negative in 536 patients (76.3%). These patients had the D-dimer determination, which was positive in 279 and negative in the remaining 257 patients. Of the former, PE subsequently was documented in 55 patients (19.7%). Of the latter, symptomatic VTE in the follow-up period developed in three patients (1.17%; 95% confidence interval, 0.24 to 3.38%). In conclusion, when using the four-detector row, the negative predictive value of CT findings in patients with clinically suspected PE and positive D-dimer is low. In contrast, it is safe to withhold anticoagulation from patients with negative findings and negative D-dimer.

AB - Although spiral computed tomography (CT) is being used increasingly as the first-line imaging procedure in the diagnostic workup of patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism (PE), the diagnostic value of negative findings, at least when using the four-detector row scanners, is still controversial. A total of 702 consecutive patients with clinical symptoms suggestive of PE underwent four-slice CT. Patients with negative findings received the determination of D-dimer. Those with positive D-dimer underwent further diagnostic workup to confirm or rule out the diagnosis of PE. Those with negative D-dimer were followed-up to 6 months to detect the development of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE). The CT test was interpreted as negative in 536 patients (76.3%). These patients had the D-dimer determination, which was positive in 279 and negative in the remaining 257 patients. Of the former, PE subsequently was documented in 55 patients (19.7%). Of the latter, symptomatic VTE in the follow-up period developed in three patients (1.17%; 95% confidence interval, 0.24 to 3.38%). In conclusion, when using the four-detector row, the negative predictive value of CT findings in patients with clinically suspected PE and positive D-dimer is low. In contrast, it is safe to withhold anticoagulation from patients with negative findings and negative D-dimer.

KW - D-dimer

KW - Diagnosis

KW - Pulmonary embolism

KW - Spiral computed tomography

KW - Venous thromboembolism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845649406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33845649406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-2006-955470

DO - 10.1055/s-2006-955470

M3 - Article

C2 - 17171597

AN - SCOPUS:33845649406

VL - 32

SP - 831

EP - 837

JO - Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis

JF - Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis

SN - 0094-6176

IS - 8

ER -