The value of precontrast thoraco-abdominopelvic CT in polytrauma patients

A. A. Esposito, M. Zilocchi, P. Fasani, C. Giannitto, S. Maccagnoni, M. Maniglio, M. Campoleoni, R. Brambilla, E. Casiraghi, P. R. Biondetti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the utility and radiation dose of thoraco-abdominopelvic precontrast CT in polytrauma patients. Materials and methods We examined retrospectively 125 patients who underwent a thoraco-abdominopelvic CT for trauma. Two radiologists, independently, evaluated precontrast CT acquisition and two other radiologists examined the contrast-enhanced scans. A further two radiologists assessed both the acquisitions. Mean value of sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated by each group of radiologists. For 104 patients, CTDIvol, DLP data and individual mean size were collected to calculate effective dose. Results Mean values of SE, SP, PPV and NPV of findings of radiologists who assessed contrast-enhanced acquisitions were respectively: SE = 85%, SP = 98%, PPV = 86%, NPV = 88% versus: SE = 43%, SP = 95%, PPV = 69%, NPV = 88% of radiologists who examined non-contrast-enhanced scans. Mean values of radiologists who analyzed both acquisitions were: SE = 80%, SP = 97%, PPV = 80%, NPV = 88%. Neither the precontrast scans nor the precontrast and postcontrast scans together provided additional useful information compared to the single contrast-enhanced acquisition. Patients received a mean dose of 12 mSv for the precontrast CT. Conclusions Precontrast CT acquisition did not provide significant information in trauma patients, exposing them to an unjustified radiation dose.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1212-1218
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Journal of Radiology
Volume84
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1 2015

Fingerprint

Multiple Trauma
Sensitivity and Specificity
Radiation
Wounds and Injuries
Radiologists

Keywords

  • CT protocol
  • Dose reduction
  • Emergency radiology
  • Polytrauma
  • Whole body CT

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The value of precontrast thoraco-abdominopelvic CT in polytrauma patients. / Esposito, A. A.; Zilocchi, M.; Fasani, P.; Giannitto, C.; Maccagnoni, S.; Maniglio, M.; Campoleoni, M.; Brambilla, R.; Casiraghi, E.; Biondetti, P. R.

In: European Journal of Radiology, Vol. 84, No. 6, 01.06.2015, p. 1212-1218.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Esposito, AA, Zilocchi, M, Fasani, P, Giannitto, C, Maccagnoni, S, Maniglio, M, Campoleoni, M, Brambilla, R, Casiraghi, E & Biondetti, PR 2015, 'The value of precontrast thoraco-abdominopelvic CT in polytrauma patients', European Journal of Radiology, vol. 84, no. 6, pp. 1212-1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.02.015
Esposito, A. A. ; Zilocchi, M. ; Fasani, P. ; Giannitto, C. ; Maccagnoni, S. ; Maniglio, M. ; Campoleoni, M. ; Brambilla, R. ; Casiraghi, E. ; Biondetti, P. R. / The value of precontrast thoraco-abdominopelvic CT in polytrauma patients. In: European Journal of Radiology. 2015 ; Vol. 84, No. 6. pp. 1212-1218.
@article{b861fa7ce9014d9c8e3366404e10cd61,
title = "The value of precontrast thoraco-abdominopelvic CT in polytrauma patients",
abstract = "Purpose To evaluate the utility and radiation dose of thoraco-abdominopelvic precontrast CT in polytrauma patients. Materials and methods We examined retrospectively 125 patients who underwent a thoraco-abdominopelvic CT for trauma. Two radiologists, independently, evaluated precontrast CT acquisition and two other radiologists examined the contrast-enhanced scans. A further two radiologists assessed both the acquisitions. Mean value of sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated by each group of radiologists. For 104 patients, CTDIvol, DLP data and individual mean size were collected to calculate effective dose. Results Mean values of SE, SP, PPV and NPV of findings of radiologists who assessed contrast-enhanced acquisitions were respectively: SE = 85{\%}, SP = 98{\%}, PPV = 86{\%}, NPV = 88{\%} versus: SE = 43{\%}, SP = 95{\%}, PPV = 69{\%}, NPV = 88{\%} of radiologists who examined non-contrast-enhanced scans. Mean values of radiologists who analyzed both acquisitions were: SE = 80{\%}, SP = 97{\%}, PPV = 80{\%}, NPV = 88{\%}. Neither the precontrast scans nor the precontrast and postcontrast scans together provided additional useful information compared to the single contrast-enhanced acquisition. Patients received a mean dose of 12 mSv for the precontrast CT. Conclusions Precontrast CT acquisition did not provide significant information in trauma patients, exposing them to an unjustified radiation dose.",
keywords = "CT protocol, Dose reduction, Emergency radiology, Polytrauma, Whole body CT",
author = "Esposito, {A. A.} and M. Zilocchi and P. Fasani and C. Giannitto and S. Maccagnoni and M. Maniglio and M. Campoleoni and R. Brambilla and E. Casiraghi and Biondetti, {P. R.}",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.02.015",
language = "English",
volume = "84",
pages = "1212--1218",
journal = "European Journal of Radiology",
issn = "0720-048X",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The value of precontrast thoraco-abdominopelvic CT in polytrauma patients

AU - Esposito, A. A.

AU - Zilocchi, M.

AU - Fasani, P.

AU - Giannitto, C.

AU - Maccagnoni, S.

AU - Maniglio, M.

AU - Campoleoni, M.

AU - Brambilla, R.

AU - Casiraghi, E.

AU - Biondetti, P. R.

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - Purpose To evaluate the utility and radiation dose of thoraco-abdominopelvic precontrast CT in polytrauma patients. Materials and methods We examined retrospectively 125 patients who underwent a thoraco-abdominopelvic CT for trauma. Two radiologists, independently, evaluated precontrast CT acquisition and two other radiologists examined the contrast-enhanced scans. A further two radiologists assessed both the acquisitions. Mean value of sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated by each group of radiologists. For 104 patients, CTDIvol, DLP data and individual mean size were collected to calculate effective dose. Results Mean values of SE, SP, PPV and NPV of findings of radiologists who assessed contrast-enhanced acquisitions were respectively: SE = 85%, SP = 98%, PPV = 86%, NPV = 88% versus: SE = 43%, SP = 95%, PPV = 69%, NPV = 88% of radiologists who examined non-contrast-enhanced scans. Mean values of radiologists who analyzed both acquisitions were: SE = 80%, SP = 97%, PPV = 80%, NPV = 88%. Neither the precontrast scans nor the precontrast and postcontrast scans together provided additional useful information compared to the single contrast-enhanced acquisition. Patients received a mean dose of 12 mSv for the precontrast CT. Conclusions Precontrast CT acquisition did not provide significant information in trauma patients, exposing them to an unjustified radiation dose.

AB - Purpose To evaluate the utility and radiation dose of thoraco-abdominopelvic precontrast CT in polytrauma patients. Materials and methods We examined retrospectively 125 patients who underwent a thoraco-abdominopelvic CT for trauma. Two radiologists, independently, evaluated precontrast CT acquisition and two other radiologists examined the contrast-enhanced scans. A further two radiologists assessed both the acquisitions. Mean value of sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated by each group of radiologists. For 104 patients, CTDIvol, DLP data and individual mean size were collected to calculate effective dose. Results Mean values of SE, SP, PPV and NPV of findings of radiologists who assessed contrast-enhanced acquisitions were respectively: SE = 85%, SP = 98%, PPV = 86%, NPV = 88% versus: SE = 43%, SP = 95%, PPV = 69%, NPV = 88% of radiologists who examined non-contrast-enhanced scans. Mean values of radiologists who analyzed both acquisitions were: SE = 80%, SP = 97%, PPV = 80%, NPV = 88%. Neither the precontrast scans nor the precontrast and postcontrast scans together provided additional useful information compared to the single contrast-enhanced acquisition. Patients received a mean dose of 12 mSv for the precontrast CT. Conclusions Precontrast CT acquisition did not provide significant information in trauma patients, exposing them to an unjustified radiation dose.

KW - CT protocol

KW - Dose reduction

KW - Emergency radiology

KW - Polytrauma

KW - Whole body CT

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929024296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929024296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.02.015

DO - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.02.015

M3 - Article

C2 - 25795195

AN - SCOPUS:84929024296

VL - 84

SP - 1212

EP - 1218

JO - European Journal of Radiology

JF - European Journal of Radiology

SN - 0720-048X

IS - 6

ER -