Three-dimensional computerized anthropometry of the nose

Landmark representation compared to surface analysis

Virgilio F. Ferrario, Fabrizio Mian, Redento Peretta, Riccardo Rosati, Chiarella Sforza

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare three-dimensional nasal measurements directly made on subjects to those made on plaster casts, and nasal dimensions obtained with a surface-based approach to values obtained with a landmark representation. Methods: Soft-tissue nasal landmarks were directly digitized on 20 healthy adults. Stone casts of their noses were digitized and mathematically reconstructed using nonuniform rational B-splines (NURBS) curves. Linear distances, angles, volumes and surface areas were computed using facial landmarks and NURBS-reconstructed models (surface-based approach). Results: Measurements on the stone casts were somewhat smaller than values obtained directly from subjects (differences between -0.05 and -1.58 mm). Dahlberg's statistic ranged between 0.73 and 1.47 mm. Significant (p <.05) t values were found for 4 of 15 measurements. The surface-based approach gave values 3.5 (volumes) and 2.1 (surface area) times larger than those computed with the landmark-based method. The two values were significantly related (volume, r = 0.881; surface, r = 0.924; p <.001), the resulting equations estimated actual values well (mean difference, volume -0.01 mm3, SD 1.47, area 0.05 cm2, SD 1.44); limits of agreement between -2.89 and 2.87 mm3 (volume); -2.88 and 2.78 cm2 (area). Conclusions: Considering the characteristics of the two methods, and for practical purposes, nasal distances and angles obtained on plaster models were comparable to digital data obtained directly from subjects. Surface areas and volumes were best obtained using a surface-based approach, but could be estimated using data provided by the landmark representation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)278-285
Number of pages8
JournalCleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2007

Fingerprint

Anthropometry
Nose
Surgical Casts

Keywords

  • Computerized anthropometry
  • Human
  • Nose
  • Three-dimensional

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Three-dimensional computerized anthropometry of the nose : Landmark representation compared to surface analysis. / Ferrario, Virgilio F.; Mian, Fabrizio; Peretta, Redento; Rosati, Riccardo; Sforza, Chiarella.

In: Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, Vol. 44, No. 3, 05.2007, p. 278-285.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ferrario, Virgilio F. ; Mian, Fabrizio ; Peretta, Redento ; Rosati, Riccardo ; Sforza, Chiarella. / Three-dimensional computerized anthropometry of the nose : Landmark representation compared to surface analysis. In: Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 2007 ; Vol. 44, No. 3. pp. 278-285.
@article{d3493c901a024276a4e6173b97fd3a13,
title = "Three-dimensional computerized anthropometry of the nose: Landmark representation compared to surface analysis",
abstract = "Objective: To compare three-dimensional nasal measurements directly made on subjects to those made on plaster casts, and nasal dimensions obtained with a surface-based approach to values obtained with a landmark representation. Methods: Soft-tissue nasal landmarks were directly digitized on 20 healthy adults. Stone casts of their noses were digitized and mathematically reconstructed using nonuniform rational B-splines (NURBS) curves. Linear distances, angles, volumes and surface areas were computed using facial landmarks and NURBS-reconstructed models (surface-based approach). Results: Measurements on the stone casts were somewhat smaller than values obtained directly from subjects (differences between -0.05 and -1.58 mm). Dahlberg's statistic ranged between 0.73 and 1.47 mm. Significant (p <.05) t values were found for 4 of 15 measurements. The surface-based approach gave values 3.5 (volumes) and 2.1 (surface area) times larger than those computed with the landmark-based method. The two values were significantly related (volume, r = 0.881; surface, r = 0.924; p <.001), the resulting equations estimated actual values well (mean difference, volume -0.01 mm3, SD 1.47, area 0.05 cm2, SD 1.44); limits of agreement between -2.89 and 2.87 mm3 (volume); -2.88 and 2.78 cm2 (area). Conclusions: Considering the characteristics of the two methods, and for practical purposes, nasal distances and angles obtained on plaster models were comparable to digital data obtained directly from subjects. Surface areas and volumes were best obtained using a surface-based approach, but could be estimated using data provided by the landmark representation.",
keywords = "Computerized anthropometry, Human, Nose, Three-dimensional",
author = "Ferrario, {Virgilio F.} and Fabrizio Mian and Redento Peretta and Riccardo Rosati and Chiarella Sforza",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1597/06-021",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "278--285",
journal = "Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal",
issn = "1055-6656",
publisher = "American Cleft Palate Craniofacial Association",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Three-dimensional computerized anthropometry of the nose

T2 - Landmark representation compared to surface analysis

AU - Ferrario, Virgilio F.

AU - Mian, Fabrizio

AU - Peretta, Redento

AU - Rosati, Riccardo

AU - Sforza, Chiarella

PY - 2007/5

Y1 - 2007/5

N2 - Objective: To compare three-dimensional nasal measurements directly made on subjects to those made on plaster casts, and nasal dimensions obtained with a surface-based approach to values obtained with a landmark representation. Methods: Soft-tissue nasal landmarks were directly digitized on 20 healthy adults. Stone casts of their noses were digitized and mathematically reconstructed using nonuniform rational B-splines (NURBS) curves. Linear distances, angles, volumes and surface areas were computed using facial landmarks and NURBS-reconstructed models (surface-based approach). Results: Measurements on the stone casts were somewhat smaller than values obtained directly from subjects (differences between -0.05 and -1.58 mm). Dahlberg's statistic ranged between 0.73 and 1.47 mm. Significant (p <.05) t values were found for 4 of 15 measurements. The surface-based approach gave values 3.5 (volumes) and 2.1 (surface area) times larger than those computed with the landmark-based method. The two values were significantly related (volume, r = 0.881; surface, r = 0.924; p <.001), the resulting equations estimated actual values well (mean difference, volume -0.01 mm3, SD 1.47, area 0.05 cm2, SD 1.44); limits of agreement between -2.89 and 2.87 mm3 (volume); -2.88 and 2.78 cm2 (area). Conclusions: Considering the characteristics of the two methods, and for practical purposes, nasal distances and angles obtained on plaster models were comparable to digital data obtained directly from subjects. Surface areas and volumes were best obtained using a surface-based approach, but could be estimated using data provided by the landmark representation.

AB - Objective: To compare three-dimensional nasal measurements directly made on subjects to those made on plaster casts, and nasal dimensions obtained with a surface-based approach to values obtained with a landmark representation. Methods: Soft-tissue nasal landmarks were directly digitized on 20 healthy adults. Stone casts of their noses were digitized and mathematically reconstructed using nonuniform rational B-splines (NURBS) curves. Linear distances, angles, volumes and surface areas were computed using facial landmarks and NURBS-reconstructed models (surface-based approach). Results: Measurements on the stone casts were somewhat smaller than values obtained directly from subjects (differences between -0.05 and -1.58 mm). Dahlberg's statistic ranged between 0.73 and 1.47 mm. Significant (p <.05) t values were found for 4 of 15 measurements. The surface-based approach gave values 3.5 (volumes) and 2.1 (surface area) times larger than those computed with the landmark-based method. The two values were significantly related (volume, r = 0.881; surface, r = 0.924; p <.001), the resulting equations estimated actual values well (mean difference, volume -0.01 mm3, SD 1.47, area 0.05 cm2, SD 1.44); limits of agreement between -2.89 and 2.87 mm3 (volume); -2.88 and 2.78 cm2 (area). Conclusions: Considering the characteristics of the two methods, and for practical purposes, nasal distances and angles obtained on plaster models were comparable to digital data obtained directly from subjects. Surface areas and volumes were best obtained using a surface-based approach, but could be estimated using data provided by the landmark representation.

KW - Computerized anthropometry

KW - Human

KW - Nose

KW - Three-dimensional

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34248336127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34248336127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1597/06-021

DO - 10.1597/06-021

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 278

EP - 285

JO - Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

JF - Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

SN - 1055-6656

IS - 3

ER -