Topical Prilocaine-Lidocaine Cream Combined with Peripheral Nerve Block Improves Pain Control in Prostatic Biopsy

Results from a Prospective Randomized Trial

Marco Raber, Vincenzo Scattoni, Marco Roscigno, Federico Dehò, Alberto Briganti, Andrea Salonia, Andrea Gallina, Valerio Di Girolamo, Francesco Montorsi, Patrizio Rigatti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To compare pain control results between periprostatic nerve block alone and combined with topical prilocaine-lidocaine cream as local anesthesia of prostate biopsy. Methods: Three hundred patients were randomized to receive PNB (group 1), topical anesthesia of the anal ring, anal canal, and anterior rectal wall combined with PNB (group 2) and placebo (group 3). Patients were asked to use scale of 0-10 to complete a visual analogue scale questionnaire about pain during probe insertion (VAS1), periprostatic infiltration (VAS2), and cores (VAS3). Results: Pain during probe insertion in group 2 was significantly less than in groups 1 and 3 (VAS1, 0.29 vs. 1.46 and 1.48; p <0.0001). Pain during periprostatic infiltration was also reduced in group 2 compared with group 1 (VAS2, 1.06 vs. 2.39; p <0.0001). Pain control was similar during biopsy in the PNB and combined groups (VAS3, 0.43 vs. 0.37; p = 0.77) and was superior to group 3 (VAS3, 3.02; p <0.0001). In younger patients (cut off, median age 67 yr) these differences were still significant between groups 1 and 2 (VAS1, 1.95 vs.0.31; p <0.0001 and VAS2, 2.97 vs. 1,15; p <0.0001), but not in older patients (VAS1, 0.91 vs. 0.28; p = 0.06; VAS2, 1.52 vs. 0,92; p = 0.06). Vagal symptoms were registered in 36 (12%) patients in all groups. Sepsis occurred in one group 1 patient and in one group 2 patient. Rectal bleeding was observed in one group 2 patient. Conclusion: Combined prilocaine-lidocaine cream topically placed with PNB is superior to PNB alone and may be of maximum benefit for younger patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)967-975
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Urology
Volume53
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2008

Fingerprint

Prilocaine
Nerve Block
Lidocaine
Peripheral Nerves
Biopsy
Pain
Anal Canal
Local Anesthesia
Visual Analog Scale
Prostate
Sepsis
Anesthesia
Placebos
Hemorrhage

Keywords

  • Anesthesia
  • Biopsy
  • Prostate cancer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Topical Prilocaine-Lidocaine Cream Combined with Peripheral Nerve Block Improves Pain Control in Prostatic Biopsy : Results from a Prospective Randomized Trial. / Raber, Marco; Scattoni, Vincenzo; Roscigno, Marco; Dehò, Federico; Briganti, Alberto; Salonia, Andrea; Gallina, Andrea; Di Girolamo, Valerio; Montorsi, Francesco; Rigatti, Patrizio.

In: European Urology, Vol. 53, No. 5, 05.2008, p. 967-975.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Raber, Marco ; Scattoni, Vincenzo ; Roscigno, Marco ; Dehò, Federico ; Briganti, Alberto ; Salonia, Andrea ; Gallina, Andrea ; Di Girolamo, Valerio ; Montorsi, Francesco ; Rigatti, Patrizio. / Topical Prilocaine-Lidocaine Cream Combined with Peripheral Nerve Block Improves Pain Control in Prostatic Biopsy : Results from a Prospective Randomized Trial. In: European Urology. 2008 ; Vol. 53, No. 5. pp. 967-975.
@article{13976949d95d484c8b1f67963eb06b1a,
title = "Topical Prilocaine-Lidocaine Cream Combined with Peripheral Nerve Block Improves Pain Control in Prostatic Biopsy: Results from a Prospective Randomized Trial",
abstract = "Objectives: To compare pain control results between periprostatic nerve block alone and combined with topical prilocaine-lidocaine cream as local anesthesia of prostate biopsy. Methods: Three hundred patients were randomized to receive PNB (group 1), topical anesthesia of the anal ring, anal canal, and anterior rectal wall combined with PNB (group 2) and placebo (group 3). Patients were asked to use scale of 0-10 to complete a visual analogue scale questionnaire about pain during probe insertion (VAS1), periprostatic infiltration (VAS2), and cores (VAS3). Results: Pain during probe insertion in group 2 was significantly less than in groups 1 and 3 (VAS1, 0.29 vs. 1.46 and 1.48; p <0.0001). Pain during periprostatic infiltration was also reduced in group 2 compared with group 1 (VAS2, 1.06 vs. 2.39; p <0.0001). Pain control was similar during biopsy in the PNB and combined groups (VAS3, 0.43 vs. 0.37; p = 0.77) and was superior to group 3 (VAS3, 3.02; p <0.0001). In younger patients (cut off, median age 67 yr) these differences were still significant between groups 1 and 2 (VAS1, 1.95 vs.0.31; p <0.0001 and VAS2, 2.97 vs. 1,15; p <0.0001), but not in older patients (VAS1, 0.91 vs. 0.28; p = 0.06; VAS2, 1.52 vs. 0,92; p = 0.06). Vagal symptoms were registered in 36 (12{\%}) patients in all groups. Sepsis occurred in one group 1 patient and in one group 2 patient. Rectal bleeding was observed in one group 2 patient. Conclusion: Combined prilocaine-lidocaine cream topically placed with PNB is superior to PNB alone and may be of maximum benefit for younger patients.",
keywords = "Anesthesia, Biopsy, Prostate cancer",
author = "Marco Raber and Vincenzo Scattoni and Marco Roscigno and Federico Deh{\`o} and Alberto Briganti and Andrea Salonia and Andrea Gallina and {Di Girolamo}, Valerio and Francesco Montorsi and Patrizio Rigatti",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.eururo.2007.09.005",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "967--975",
journal = "European Urology",
issn = "0302-2838",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Topical Prilocaine-Lidocaine Cream Combined with Peripheral Nerve Block Improves Pain Control in Prostatic Biopsy

T2 - Results from a Prospective Randomized Trial

AU - Raber, Marco

AU - Scattoni, Vincenzo

AU - Roscigno, Marco

AU - Dehò, Federico

AU - Briganti, Alberto

AU - Salonia, Andrea

AU - Gallina, Andrea

AU - Di Girolamo, Valerio

AU - Montorsi, Francesco

AU - Rigatti, Patrizio

PY - 2008/5

Y1 - 2008/5

N2 - Objectives: To compare pain control results between periprostatic nerve block alone and combined with topical prilocaine-lidocaine cream as local anesthesia of prostate biopsy. Methods: Three hundred patients were randomized to receive PNB (group 1), topical anesthesia of the anal ring, anal canal, and anterior rectal wall combined with PNB (group 2) and placebo (group 3). Patients were asked to use scale of 0-10 to complete a visual analogue scale questionnaire about pain during probe insertion (VAS1), periprostatic infiltration (VAS2), and cores (VAS3). Results: Pain during probe insertion in group 2 was significantly less than in groups 1 and 3 (VAS1, 0.29 vs. 1.46 and 1.48; p <0.0001). Pain during periprostatic infiltration was also reduced in group 2 compared with group 1 (VAS2, 1.06 vs. 2.39; p <0.0001). Pain control was similar during biopsy in the PNB and combined groups (VAS3, 0.43 vs. 0.37; p = 0.77) and was superior to group 3 (VAS3, 3.02; p <0.0001). In younger patients (cut off, median age 67 yr) these differences were still significant between groups 1 and 2 (VAS1, 1.95 vs.0.31; p <0.0001 and VAS2, 2.97 vs. 1,15; p <0.0001), but not in older patients (VAS1, 0.91 vs. 0.28; p = 0.06; VAS2, 1.52 vs. 0,92; p = 0.06). Vagal symptoms were registered in 36 (12%) patients in all groups. Sepsis occurred in one group 1 patient and in one group 2 patient. Rectal bleeding was observed in one group 2 patient. Conclusion: Combined prilocaine-lidocaine cream topically placed with PNB is superior to PNB alone and may be of maximum benefit for younger patients.

AB - Objectives: To compare pain control results between periprostatic nerve block alone and combined with topical prilocaine-lidocaine cream as local anesthesia of prostate biopsy. Methods: Three hundred patients were randomized to receive PNB (group 1), topical anesthesia of the anal ring, anal canal, and anterior rectal wall combined with PNB (group 2) and placebo (group 3). Patients were asked to use scale of 0-10 to complete a visual analogue scale questionnaire about pain during probe insertion (VAS1), periprostatic infiltration (VAS2), and cores (VAS3). Results: Pain during probe insertion in group 2 was significantly less than in groups 1 and 3 (VAS1, 0.29 vs. 1.46 and 1.48; p <0.0001). Pain during periprostatic infiltration was also reduced in group 2 compared with group 1 (VAS2, 1.06 vs. 2.39; p <0.0001). Pain control was similar during biopsy in the PNB and combined groups (VAS3, 0.43 vs. 0.37; p = 0.77) and was superior to group 3 (VAS3, 3.02; p <0.0001). In younger patients (cut off, median age 67 yr) these differences were still significant between groups 1 and 2 (VAS1, 1.95 vs.0.31; p <0.0001 and VAS2, 2.97 vs. 1,15; p <0.0001), but not in older patients (VAS1, 0.91 vs. 0.28; p = 0.06; VAS2, 1.52 vs. 0,92; p = 0.06). Vagal symptoms were registered in 36 (12%) patients in all groups. Sepsis occurred in one group 1 patient and in one group 2 patient. Rectal bleeding was observed in one group 2 patient. Conclusion: Combined prilocaine-lidocaine cream topically placed with PNB is superior to PNB alone and may be of maximum benefit for younger patients.

KW - Anesthesia

KW - Biopsy

KW - Prostate cancer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41149128904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41149128904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.09.005

DO - 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.09.005

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 967

EP - 975

JO - European Urology

JF - European Urology

SN - 0302-2838

IS - 5

ER -