Total Knee Replacement in Young Patients

Survival and Causes of Revision in a Registry Population

Francesco Castagnini, Alessandra Sudanese, Barbara Bordini, Enrico Tassinari, Susanna Stea, Aldo Toni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The incidence of total knee replacements (TKRs) in young patients is increasing. Few reports described encouraging results and acceptable survival rates. However, many concerns still persist, in particular about the high rates of infection and aseptic loosening. Aim of this article was to investigate the survival of TKRs in patients aged 45 years or younger in a registry population. Methods: The Emilia-Romagna registry RIPO was enquired about TKRs in patients ≤45 years; 238 TKRs were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 5.4 years (range 0-15.6 years), examining the features of the patients involved, the survival rate, and the reasons for revision of the knee implants. Results: The TKRs were generally performed in men, in private hospitals, and almost in half of the cases for other causes rather than primary osteoarthritis. The mean age was 40 years. Bicompartmental, cemented posterior-stabilized implants with fixed bearing were preferred. The survival rate was higher than 90% in the first 7 years, and then it decremented. The choice of implant did not apparently influence the survivorship. The final outcomes were acceptable, substantially in line with the previous literature about young patients. Twenty-one revisions occurred (8.8%), in particular 8 cases for aseptic loosening and 7 TKRs for infection. The rate of revision was higher than in overall population and even in some young cohorts. Conclusion: TKRs in patients aged 45 years or younger seem a promising procedure, although the high rates of septic and aseptic loosening should be carefully evaluated. Prospective, well-designed studies are required to confirm and investigate these preliminary findings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3368-3372
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Arthroplasty
Volume32
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Mar 10 2017

Fingerprint

Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Registries
Survival
Population
Survival Rate
Private Hospitals
Infection
Osteoarthritis
Knee
Incidence

Keywords

  • 45 years
  • Aseptic loosening
  • Infection
  • Juvenile
  • Total knee replacement
  • Young

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Total Knee Replacement in Young Patients : Survival and Causes of Revision in a Registry Population. / Castagnini, Francesco; Sudanese, Alessandra; Bordini, Barbara; Tassinari, Enrico; Stea, Susanna; Toni, Aldo.

In: Journal of Arthroplasty, Vol. 32, No. 11, 10.03.2017, p. 3368-3372.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Castagnini, Francesco ; Sudanese, Alessandra ; Bordini, Barbara ; Tassinari, Enrico ; Stea, Susanna ; Toni, Aldo. / Total Knee Replacement in Young Patients : Survival and Causes of Revision in a Registry Population. In: Journal of Arthroplasty. 2017 ; Vol. 32, No. 11. pp. 3368-3372.
@article{3e6bcf29564845d2af916cf4cb6aa2ab,
title = "Total Knee Replacement in Young Patients: Survival and Causes of Revision in a Registry Population",
abstract = "Background: The incidence of total knee replacements (TKRs) in young patients is increasing. Few reports described encouraging results and acceptable survival rates. However, many concerns still persist, in particular about the high rates of infection and aseptic loosening. Aim of this article was to investigate the survival of TKRs in patients aged 45 years or younger in a registry population. Methods: The Emilia-Romagna registry RIPO was enquired about TKRs in patients ≤45 years; 238 TKRs were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 5.4 years (range 0-15.6 years), examining the features of the patients involved, the survival rate, and the reasons for revision of the knee implants. Results: The TKRs were generally performed in men, in private hospitals, and almost in half of the cases for other causes rather than primary osteoarthritis. The mean age was 40 years. Bicompartmental, cemented posterior-stabilized implants with fixed bearing were preferred. The survival rate was higher than 90{\%} in the first 7 years, and then it decremented. The choice of implant did not apparently influence the survivorship. The final outcomes were acceptable, substantially in line with the previous literature about young patients. Twenty-one revisions occurred (8.8{\%}), in particular 8 cases for aseptic loosening and 7 TKRs for infection. The rate of revision was higher than in overall population and even in some young cohorts. Conclusion: TKRs in patients aged 45 years or younger seem a promising procedure, although the high rates of septic and aseptic loosening should be carefully evaluated. Prospective, well-designed studies are required to confirm and investigate these preliminary findings.",
keywords = "45 years, Aseptic loosening, Infection, Juvenile, Total knee replacement, Young",
author = "Francesco Castagnini and Alessandra Sudanese and Barbara Bordini and Enrico Tassinari and Susanna Stea and Aldo Toni",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.052",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "3368--3372",
journal = "Journal of Arthroplasty",
issn = "0883-5403",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Total Knee Replacement in Young Patients

T2 - Survival and Causes of Revision in a Registry Population

AU - Castagnini, Francesco

AU - Sudanese, Alessandra

AU - Bordini, Barbara

AU - Tassinari, Enrico

AU - Stea, Susanna

AU - Toni, Aldo

PY - 2017/3/10

Y1 - 2017/3/10

N2 - Background: The incidence of total knee replacements (TKRs) in young patients is increasing. Few reports described encouraging results and acceptable survival rates. However, many concerns still persist, in particular about the high rates of infection and aseptic loosening. Aim of this article was to investigate the survival of TKRs in patients aged 45 years or younger in a registry population. Methods: The Emilia-Romagna registry RIPO was enquired about TKRs in patients ≤45 years; 238 TKRs were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 5.4 years (range 0-15.6 years), examining the features of the patients involved, the survival rate, and the reasons for revision of the knee implants. Results: The TKRs were generally performed in men, in private hospitals, and almost in half of the cases for other causes rather than primary osteoarthritis. The mean age was 40 years. Bicompartmental, cemented posterior-stabilized implants with fixed bearing were preferred. The survival rate was higher than 90% in the first 7 years, and then it decremented. The choice of implant did not apparently influence the survivorship. The final outcomes were acceptable, substantially in line with the previous literature about young patients. Twenty-one revisions occurred (8.8%), in particular 8 cases for aseptic loosening and 7 TKRs for infection. The rate of revision was higher than in overall population and even in some young cohorts. Conclusion: TKRs in patients aged 45 years or younger seem a promising procedure, although the high rates of septic and aseptic loosening should be carefully evaluated. Prospective, well-designed studies are required to confirm and investigate these preliminary findings.

AB - Background: The incidence of total knee replacements (TKRs) in young patients is increasing. Few reports described encouraging results and acceptable survival rates. However, many concerns still persist, in particular about the high rates of infection and aseptic loosening. Aim of this article was to investigate the survival of TKRs in patients aged 45 years or younger in a registry population. Methods: The Emilia-Romagna registry RIPO was enquired about TKRs in patients ≤45 years; 238 TKRs were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 5.4 years (range 0-15.6 years), examining the features of the patients involved, the survival rate, and the reasons for revision of the knee implants. Results: The TKRs were generally performed in men, in private hospitals, and almost in half of the cases for other causes rather than primary osteoarthritis. The mean age was 40 years. Bicompartmental, cemented posterior-stabilized implants with fixed bearing were preferred. The survival rate was higher than 90% in the first 7 years, and then it decremented. The choice of implant did not apparently influence the survivorship. The final outcomes were acceptable, substantially in line with the previous literature about young patients. Twenty-one revisions occurred (8.8%), in particular 8 cases for aseptic loosening and 7 TKRs for infection. The rate of revision was higher than in overall population and even in some young cohorts. Conclusion: TKRs in patients aged 45 years or younger seem a promising procedure, although the high rates of septic and aseptic loosening should be carefully evaluated. Prospective, well-designed studies are required to confirm and investigate these preliminary findings.

KW - 45 years

KW - Aseptic loosening

KW - Infection

KW - Juvenile

KW - Total knee replacement

KW - Young

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021241645&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021241645&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.052

DO - 10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.052

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 3368

EP - 3372

JO - Journal of Arthroplasty

JF - Journal of Arthroplasty

SN - 0883-5403

IS - 11

ER -