Toward appropriate criteria in medication adherence assessment in older persons: Position Paper

Anna Giardini, Maria Teresa Martin, Caitriona Cahir, Elaine Lehane, Enrica Menditto, Maria Strano, Sergio Pecorelli, Alessandro Monaco, Alessandra Marengoni

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Nonadherence to medication regimens is a worldwide challenge; adherence rates range from 38 to 57 % in older populations with an average rate of less than 45 % and nonadherence contributes to adverse drug events, increased emergency visits and hospitalisations. Accurate measurement of medication adherence is important in terms of both research and clinical practice. However, the identification of an objective approach to measure nonadherence is still an ongoing challenge. The aim of this Position Paper is to describe the advantages and disadvantages of the known medication adherence tools (self-report, pill count, medication event monitoring system (MEMS) and electronic monitoring devices, therapeutic drug monitoring, pharmacy records based on pharmacy refill and pharmacy claims databases) to provide the appropriate criteria to assess medication adherence in older persons. To the best of our knowledge, no gold standard has been identified in adherence measurement and no single method is sufficiently reliable and accurate. A combination of methods appears to be the most suitable. Secondly, adherence assessment should always consider tools enabling polypharmacy adherence assessment. Moreover, it is increasingly evident that adherence, as a process, has to be assessed over time and not just at one evaluation time point (drug discontinuation). When cognitive deficits or functional impairments may impair reliability of adherence assessment, a comprehensive geriatric assessment should be performed and the caregiver involved. Finally, studies considering the possible implementation in clinical practice of adherence assessment tools validated in research are needed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)371-381
Number of pages11
JournalAging clinical and experimental research
Volume28
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1 2016

Fingerprint

Medication Adherence
Geriatric Assessment
Polypharmacy
Drug Monitoring
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
Research
Self Report
Caregivers
Hospitalization
Emergencies
Databases
Equipment and Supplies
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Population

Keywords

  • Adherence
  • Chronic diseases
  • Elderly
  • Nonadherence
  • Polypharmacy
  • Tools

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ageing
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

Toward appropriate criteria in medication adherence assessment in older persons : Position Paper. / Giardini, Anna; Martin, Maria Teresa; Cahir, Caitriona; Lehane, Elaine; Menditto, Enrica; Strano, Maria; Pecorelli, Sergio; Monaco, Alessandro; Marengoni, Alessandra.

In: Aging clinical and experimental research, Vol. 28, No. 3, 01.06.2016, p. 371-381.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Giardini, A, Martin, MT, Cahir, C, Lehane, E, Menditto, E, Strano, M, Pecorelli, S, Monaco, A & Marengoni, A 2016, 'Toward appropriate criteria in medication adherence assessment in older persons: Position Paper', Aging clinical and experimental research, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 371-381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-015-0435-z
Giardini, Anna ; Martin, Maria Teresa ; Cahir, Caitriona ; Lehane, Elaine ; Menditto, Enrica ; Strano, Maria ; Pecorelli, Sergio ; Monaco, Alessandro ; Marengoni, Alessandra. / Toward appropriate criteria in medication adherence assessment in older persons : Position Paper. In: Aging clinical and experimental research. 2016 ; Vol. 28, No. 3. pp. 371-381.
@article{177c1a9c56f6476d9339d9ae455fec80,
title = "Toward appropriate criteria in medication adherence assessment in older persons: Position Paper",
abstract = "Nonadherence to medication regimens is a worldwide challenge; adherence rates range from 38 to 57 {\%} in older populations with an average rate of less than 45 {\%} and nonadherence contributes to adverse drug events, increased emergency visits and hospitalisations. Accurate measurement of medication adherence is important in terms of both research and clinical practice. However, the identification of an objective approach to measure nonadherence is still an ongoing challenge. The aim of this Position Paper is to describe the advantages and disadvantages of the known medication adherence tools (self-report, pill count, medication event monitoring system (MEMS) and electronic monitoring devices, therapeutic drug monitoring, pharmacy records based on pharmacy refill and pharmacy claims databases) to provide the appropriate criteria to assess medication adherence in older persons. To the best of our knowledge, no gold standard has been identified in adherence measurement and no single method is sufficiently reliable and accurate. A combination of methods appears to be the most suitable. Secondly, adherence assessment should always consider tools enabling polypharmacy adherence assessment. Moreover, it is increasingly evident that adherence, as a process, has to be assessed over time and not just at one evaluation time point (drug discontinuation). When cognitive deficits or functional impairments may impair reliability of adherence assessment, a comprehensive geriatric assessment should be performed and the caregiver involved. Finally, studies considering the possible implementation in clinical practice of adherence assessment tools validated in research are needed.",
keywords = "Adherence, Chronic diseases, Elderly, Nonadherence, Polypharmacy, Tools",
author = "Anna Giardini and Martin, {Maria Teresa} and Caitriona Cahir and Elaine Lehane and Enrica Menditto and Maria Strano and Sergio Pecorelli and Alessandro Monaco and Alessandra Marengoni",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s40520-015-0435-z",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "371--381",
journal = "Aging clinical and experimental research",
issn = "1594-0667",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing AG",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward appropriate criteria in medication adherence assessment in older persons

T2 - Position Paper

AU - Giardini, Anna

AU - Martin, Maria Teresa

AU - Cahir, Caitriona

AU - Lehane, Elaine

AU - Menditto, Enrica

AU - Strano, Maria

AU - Pecorelli, Sergio

AU - Monaco, Alessandro

AU - Marengoni, Alessandra

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - Nonadherence to medication regimens is a worldwide challenge; adherence rates range from 38 to 57 % in older populations with an average rate of less than 45 % and nonadherence contributes to adverse drug events, increased emergency visits and hospitalisations. Accurate measurement of medication adherence is important in terms of both research and clinical practice. However, the identification of an objective approach to measure nonadherence is still an ongoing challenge. The aim of this Position Paper is to describe the advantages and disadvantages of the known medication adherence tools (self-report, pill count, medication event monitoring system (MEMS) and electronic monitoring devices, therapeutic drug monitoring, pharmacy records based on pharmacy refill and pharmacy claims databases) to provide the appropriate criteria to assess medication adherence in older persons. To the best of our knowledge, no gold standard has been identified in adherence measurement and no single method is sufficiently reliable and accurate. A combination of methods appears to be the most suitable. Secondly, adherence assessment should always consider tools enabling polypharmacy adherence assessment. Moreover, it is increasingly evident that adherence, as a process, has to be assessed over time and not just at one evaluation time point (drug discontinuation). When cognitive deficits or functional impairments may impair reliability of adherence assessment, a comprehensive geriatric assessment should be performed and the caregiver involved. Finally, studies considering the possible implementation in clinical practice of adherence assessment tools validated in research are needed.

AB - Nonadherence to medication regimens is a worldwide challenge; adherence rates range from 38 to 57 % in older populations with an average rate of less than 45 % and nonadherence contributes to adverse drug events, increased emergency visits and hospitalisations. Accurate measurement of medication adherence is important in terms of both research and clinical practice. However, the identification of an objective approach to measure nonadherence is still an ongoing challenge. The aim of this Position Paper is to describe the advantages and disadvantages of the known medication adherence tools (self-report, pill count, medication event monitoring system (MEMS) and electronic monitoring devices, therapeutic drug monitoring, pharmacy records based on pharmacy refill and pharmacy claims databases) to provide the appropriate criteria to assess medication adherence in older persons. To the best of our knowledge, no gold standard has been identified in adherence measurement and no single method is sufficiently reliable and accurate. A combination of methods appears to be the most suitable. Secondly, adherence assessment should always consider tools enabling polypharmacy adherence assessment. Moreover, it is increasingly evident that adherence, as a process, has to be assessed over time and not just at one evaluation time point (drug discontinuation). When cognitive deficits or functional impairments may impair reliability of adherence assessment, a comprehensive geriatric assessment should be performed and the caregiver involved. Finally, studies considering the possible implementation in clinical practice of adherence assessment tools validated in research are needed.

KW - Adherence

KW - Chronic diseases

KW - Elderly

KW - Nonadherence

KW - Polypharmacy

KW - Tools

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973901348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973901348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s40520-015-0435-z

DO - 10.1007/s40520-015-0435-z

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84973901348

VL - 28

SP - 371

EP - 381

JO - Aging clinical and experimental research

JF - Aging clinical and experimental research

SN - 1594-0667

IS - 3

ER -