Towards a neurophysiology of language

Stefano F. Cappa

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Scientific study of the relationship between language and the human brain started in the second half of the nineteenth century, as one of the many aspects of experimental medicine, and, in particular, of experimental physiology [1]. There is no need to retell a story that has already been told several times (for an excellent, very readable review, see [2]). The specific limitation in the case of language was, of course, that experimental studies in animals are not possible. However, an answer to this obstacle came from clinical neurology, when several astute physicians, whose names form the Hall of Fame of neuropsychology, such as Broca and Wernicke, inaugurated systematic application of the anatomico-clinical method to the study of language disorders. The logic of this approach took advantage of those accidents of nature, i.e., spontaneously occurring brain lesions. Information gathered from observations of the clinical picture, combined with knowledge about the location of the lesion in the brain, allowed the localization of cognitive functions to discrete brain regions. In the case of language, this led to the development of the classical Wernicke-Lichtheim model of word processing, which still finds an honorable place in practically every textbook dealing with aphasia [3]. The model's fortunes and, in general, those of what Head called the diagram-makers, have fluctuated over the years-with eclipses during the golden age of gestalt psychology and, sometime, later, by the advent of behaviorism [4]. What is important to underline here is that acceptance of the idea that complex aspects of language, such as syntax, or the lexicon, could be localized to specific brain areas has gone largely unchallenged well into the era of cognitive neuroscience.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationNeuropsychology of Communication
PublisherSpringer Milan
Pages145-155
Number of pages11
ISBN (Print)9788847015838
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Neurophysiology
Language
Brain
Behaviorism
Word Processing
Language Disorders
Neuropsychology
Textbooks
Aphasia
Neurology
Cognition
Names
Accidents
Biomedical Research
Head
Psychology
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Cappa, S. F. (2010). Towards a neurophysiology of language. In Neuropsychology of Communication (pp. 145-155). Springer Milan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1584-5_8

Towards a neurophysiology of language. / Cappa, Stefano F.

Neuropsychology of Communication. Springer Milan, 2010. p. 145-155.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Cappa, SF 2010, Towards a neurophysiology of language. in Neuropsychology of Communication. Springer Milan, pp. 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1584-5_8
Cappa SF. Towards a neurophysiology of language. In Neuropsychology of Communication. Springer Milan. 2010. p. 145-155 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1584-5_8
Cappa, Stefano F. / Towards a neurophysiology of language. Neuropsychology of Communication. Springer Milan, 2010. pp. 145-155
@inbook{cf6877588eb44f5595b91e2bc0efd2f2,
title = "Towards a neurophysiology of language",
abstract = "Scientific study of the relationship between language and the human brain started in the second half of the nineteenth century, as one of the many aspects of experimental medicine, and, in particular, of experimental physiology [1]. There is no need to retell a story that has already been told several times (for an excellent, very readable review, see [2]). The specific limitation in the case of language was, of course, that experimental studies in animals are not possible. However, an answer to this obstacle came from clinical neurology, when several astute physicians, whose names form the Hall of Fame of neuropsychology, such as Broca and Wernicke, inaugurated systematic application of the anatomico-clinical method to the study of language disorders. The logic of this approach took advantage of those accidents of nature, i.e., spontaneously occurring brain lesions. Information gathered from observations of the clinical picture, combined with knowledge about the location of the lesion in the brain, allowed the localization of cognitive functions to discrete brain regions. In the case of language, this led to the development of the classical Wernicke-Lichtheim model of word processing, which still finds an honorable place in practically every textbook dealing with aphasia [3]. The model's fortunes and, in general, those of what Head called the diagram-makers, have fluctuated over the years-with eclipses during the golden age of gestalt psychology and, sometime, later, by the advent of behaviorism [4]. What is important to underline here is that acceptance of the idea that complex aspects of language, such as syntax, or the lexicon, could be localized to specific brain areas has gone largely unchallenged well into the era of cognitive neuroscience.",
author = "Cappa, {Stefano F.}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1007/978-88-470-1584-5_8",
language = "English",
isbn = "9788847015838",
pages = "145--155",
booktitle = "Neuropsychology of Communication",
publisher = "Springer Milan",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Towards a neurophysiology of language

AU - Cappa, Stefano F.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Scientific study of the relationship between language and the human brain started in the second half of the nineteenth century, as one of the many aspects of experimental medicine, and, in particular, of experimental physiology [1]. There is no need to retell a story that has already been told several times (for an excellent, very readable review, see [2]). The specific limitation in the case of language was, of course, that experimental studies in animals are not possible. However, an answer to this obstacle came from clinical neurology, when several astute physicians, whose names form the Hall of Fame of neuropsychology, such as Broca and Wernicke, inaugurated systematic application of the anatomico-clinical method to the study of language disorders. The logic of this approach took advantage of those accidents of nature, i.e., spontaneously occurring brain lesions. Information gathered from observations of the clinical picture, combined with knowledge about the location of the lesion in the brain, allowed the localization of cognitive functions to discrete brain regions. In the case of language, this led to the development of the classical Wernicke-Lichtheim model of word processing, which still finds an honorable place in practically every textbook dealing with aphasia [3]. The model's fortunes and, in general, those of what Head called the diagram-makers, have fluctuated over the years-with eclipses during the golden age of gestalt psychology and, sometime, later, by the advent of behaviorism [4]. What is important to underline here is that acceptance of the idea that complex aspects of language, such as syntax, or the lexicon, could be localized to specific brain areas has gone largely unchallenged well into the era of cognitive neuroscience.

AB - Scientific study of the relationship between language and the human brain started in the second half of the nineteenth century, as one of the many aspects of experimental medicine, and, in particular, of experimental physiology [1]. There is no need to retell a story that has already been told several times (for an excellent, very readable review, see [2]). The specific limitation in the case of language was, of course, that experimental studies in animals are not possible. However, an answer to this obstacle came from clinical neurology, when several astute physicians, whose names form the Hall of Fame of neuropsychology, such as Broca and Wernicke, inaugurated systematic application of the anatomico-clinical method to the study of language disorders. The logic of this approach took advantage of those accidents of nature, i.e., spontaneously occurring brain lesions. Information gathered from observations of the clinical picture, combined with knowledge about the location of the lesion in the brain, allowed the localization of cognitive functions to discrete brain regions. In the case of language, this led to the development of the classical Wernicke-Lichtheim model of word processing, which still finds an honorable place in practically every textbook dealing with aphasia [3]. The model's fortunes and, in general, those of what Head called the diagram-makers, have fluctuated over the years-with eclipses during the golden age of gestalt psychology and, sometime, later, by the advent of behaviorism [4]. What is important to underline here is that acceptance of the idea that complex aspects of language, such as syntax, or the lexicon, could be localized to specific brain areas has gone largely unchallenged well into the era of cognitive neuroscience.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892094540&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892094540&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-88-470-1584-5_8

DO - 10.1007/978-88-470-1584-5_8

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9788847015838

SP - 145

EP - 155

BT - Neuropsychology of Communication

PB - Springer Milan

ER -