Traditional invasive vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy: A multi-center, randomized trial (TIME-trial)

Surya Say Biere, Kirsten W. Maas, Luigi Bonavina, Josep Roig Garcia, Mark I. Van Berge Henegouwen, Camiel Rosman, Meindert N. Sosef, Elly Sm De Lange, H. Jaap Bonjer, Miguel A. Cuesta, Donald L. Van Der Peet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: There is a rise in incidence of esophageal carcinoma due to increasing incidence of adenocarcinoma. Probably the only curative option to date is the use of neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgical resection. Traditional open esophageal resection is associated with a high morbidity and mortality rate. Furthermore, this approach involves long intensive care unit stay, in-hospital stay and long recovery period. Minimally invasive esophagectomy could reduce the morbidity and accelerate the post-operative recovery. Methods/Design. Comparison between traditional open and minimally invasive esophagectomy in a multi-center, randomized trial. Patients with a resectable intrathoracic esophageal carcinoma, including the gastro-esophageal junction tumors (Siewert I) are eligible for inclusion. Prior thoracic surgery and cervical esophageal carcinoma are indications for exclusion. The surgical technique involves a right thoracotomy with lung blockade and laparotomy either with a cervical or thoracic anastomosis for the traditional group. The minimally invasive procedure involves a right thoracoscopy in prone position with a single lumen tube and laparoscopy either with a cervical or thoracic anastomosis. All patients in both groups will undergo identical pre-operative and post-operative protocol. Primary endpoint of this study are post-operative respiratory complications within the first two post-operative weeks confirmed by clinical, radiological and sputum culture data. Secondary endpoints are the operative data, the post-operative data and oncological data such as quality of the specimen and survival. Operative data include duration of the operation, blood loss and conversion to open procedure. Post-operative data include morbidity (major and minor), quality of life tests and hospital stay. Based on current literature and the experience of all participating centers, an incidence of pulmonary complications for 57% in the traditional arm and 29% in the minimally invasive arm, it is estimated that per arm 48 patients are needed. This is based on a two-sided significance level (alpha) of 0.05 and a power of 0.80. Knowing that approximately 20% of the patients will be excluded, we will randomize 60 patients per arm. Discussion. The TIME-trial is a prospective, multi-center, randomized study to define the role of minimally invasive esophageal resection in patients with resectable intrathoracic and junction esophageal cancer. Trial registration (Netherlands Trial Register). NTR2452.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2
JournalBMC Surgery
Volume11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Traditional invasive vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy: A multi-center, randomized trial (TIME-trial)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this