Transcranial Electrical Stimulation: What We Know and Do Not Know About Mechanisms

Anna Fertonani, Carlo Miniussi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In recent years, there has been remarkable progress in the understanding and practical use of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) techniques. Nevertheless, to date, this experimental effort has not been accompanied by substantial reflections on the models and mechanisms that could explain the stimulation effects. Given these premises, the aim of this article is to provide an updated picture of what we know about the theoretical models of tES that have been proposed to date, contextualized in a more specific and unitary framework. We demonstrate that these models can explain the tES behavioral effects as distributed along a continuum from stimulation dependent to network activity dependent. In this framework, we also propose that stochastic resonance is a useful mechanism to explain the general online neuromodulation effects of tES. Moreover, we highlight the aspects that should be considered in future research. We emphasize that tES is not an "easy-to-use" technique; however, it may represent a very fruitful approach if applied within rigorous protocols, with deep knowledge of both the behavioral and cognitive aspects and the more recent advances in the application of stimulation.

Original languageEnglish
JournalNeuroscientist
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - Feb 12 2016

Fingerprint

Theoretical Models
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Keywords

  • Review
  • Journal Article

Cite this

Transcranial Electrical Stimulation : What We Know and Do Not Know About Mechanisms. / Fertonani, Anna; Miniussi, Carlo.

In: Neuroscientist, 12.02.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{24102a4a50ec42a59ab6f689a540b247,
title = "Transcranial Electrical Stimulation: What We Know and Do Not Know About Mechanisms",
abstract = "In recent years, there has been remarkable progress in the understanding and practical use of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) techniques. Nevertheless, to date, this experimental effort has not been accompanied by substantial reflections on the models and mechanisms that could explain the stimulation effects. Given these premises, the aim of this article is to provide an updated picture of what we know about the theoretical models of tES that have been proposed to date, contextualized in a more specific and unitary framework. We demonstrate that these models can explain the tES behavioral effects as distributed along a continuum from stimulation dependent to network activity dependent. In this framework, we also propose that stochastic resonance is a useful mechanism to explain the general online neuromodulation effects of tES. Moreover, we highlight the aspects that should be considered in future research. We emphasize that tES is not an {"}easy-to-use{"} technique; however, it may represent a very fruitful approach if applied within rigorous protocols, with deep knowledge of both the behavioral and cognitive aspects and the more recent advances in the application of stimulation.",
keywords = "Review, Journal Article",
author = "Anna Fertonani and Carlo Miniussi",
note = "{\circledC} The Author(s) 2016.",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1177/1073858416631966",
language = "English",
journal = "Neuroscientist",
issn = "1073-8584",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transcranial Electrical Stimulation

T2 - What We Know and Do Not Know About Mechanisms

AU - Fertonani, Anna

AU - Miniussi, Carlo

N1 - © The Author(s) 2016.

PY - 2016/2/12

Y1 - 2016/2/12

N2 - In recent years, there has been remarkable progress in the understanding and practical use of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) techniques. Nevertheless, to date, this experimental effort has not been accompanied by substantial reflections on the models and mechanisms that could explain the stimulation effects. Given these premises, the aim of this article is to provide an updated picture of what we know about the theoretical models of tES that have been proposed to date, contextualized in a more specific and unitary framework. We demonstrate that these models can explain the tES behavioral effects as distributed along a continuum from stimulation dependent to network activity dependent. In this framework, we also propose that stochastic resonance is a useful mechanism to explain the general online neuromodulation effects of tES. Moreover, we highlight the aspects that should be considered in future research. We emphasize that tES is not an "easy-to-use" technique; however, it may represent a very fruitful approach if applied within rigorous protocols, with deep knowledge of both the behavioral and cognitive aspects and the more recent advances in the application of stimulation.

AB - In recent years, there has been remarkable progress in the understanding and practical use of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) techniques. Nevertheless, to date, this experimental effort has not been accompanied by substantial reflections on the models and mechanisms that could explain the stimulation effects. Given these premises, the aim of this article is to provide an updated picture of what we know about the theoretical models of tES that have been proposed to date, contextualized in a more specific and unitary framework. We demonstrate that these models can explain the tES behavioral effects as distributed along a continuum from stimulation dependent to network activity dependent. In this framework, we also propose that stochastic resonance is a useful mechanism to explain the general online neuromodulation effects of tES. Moreover, we highlight the aspects that should be considered in future research. We emphasize that tES is not an "easy-to-use" technique; however, it may represent a very fruitful approach if applied within rigorous protocols, with deep knowledge of both the behavioral and cognitive aspects and the more recent advances in the application of stimulation.

KW - Review

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1177/1073858416631966

DO - 10.1177/1073858416631966

M3 - Article

C2 - 26873962

JO - Neuroscientist

JF - Neuroscientist

SN - 1073-8584

ER -