Transient hepatic echogenicity difference on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography

Sonographic sign and pitfall

Orlando Catalano, Fabio Sandomenico, Antonio Nunziata, Mauro Mattace Raso, Paolo Vallone, Alfredo Siani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. The purpose of this study was to report and analyze a new contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic (CEUS) imaging finding, the transient hepatic echogenicity difference due to perfusion changes, using computed tomography (CT) as a reference standard. Methods. We retrospectively investigated the records of patients evaluated in a 2-year period, selecting those who had undergone both CT and CEUS within 15 days, who had CT evidence of a perfusion abnormality, and who had had a CEUS study that included the malperfused parenchymal area. Results. There were 30 patients with 44 hepatic perfusion changes on CT scans (28 around liver focal lesions and 16 unrelated to focal lesions). Retrospectively, CEUS allowed recognition of 21 of 28 perifocal transient hepatic attenuation differences (THADs), 6 of 10 subsegmental THADs, 2 of 3 segmental THADs, and 1 of 3 lobar THADs. Only some of these abnormalities had been identified at the original CEUS examinations: 0 of 3 lobar THADs, 1 of 3 segmental THADs, 2 of 10 subsegmental THADs, and 16 of 28 perifocal THADs. Conclusions. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography can show hepatic perfusion abnormalities similar to those well known from CT literature, although with a lower sensitivity. Knowledge of this transient hepatic echogenicity difference phenomenon may be relevant for avoiding incorrect image interpretation or incorrect tumor size measurement and for eventually identifying occult vascular disorders such as venous thrombosis or fistulas.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)337-345
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Volume26
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2007

Fingerprint

Ultrasonography
attenuation
Liver
tomography
abnormalities
Tomography
Perfusion
lesions
thrombosis
liver
tumors
examination
disorders
Venous Thrombosis
sensitivity
Fistula
Blood Vessels

Keywords

  • Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, liver
  • Liver, focal lesions
  • Liver, perfusion
  • Liver, vascular abnormalities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

Transient hepatic echogenicity difference on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography : Sonographic sign and pitfall. / Catalano, Orlando; Sandomenico, Fabio; Nunziata, Antonio; Raso, Mauro Mattace; Vallone, Paolo; Siani, Alfredo.

In: Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol. 26, No. 3, 03.2007, p. 337-345.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{91fd99e372db49fbb312a9e8c4932918,
title = "Transient hepatic echogenicity difference on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: Sonographic sign and pitfall",
abstract = "Objective. The purpose of this study was to report and analyze a new contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic (CEUS) imaging finding, the transient hepatic echogenicity difference due to perfusion changes, using computed tomography (CT) as a reference standard. Methods. We retrospectively investigated the records of patients evaluated in a 2-year period, selecting those who had undergone both CT and CEUS within 15 days, who had CT evidence of a perfusion abnormality, and who had had a CEUS study that included the malperfused parenchymal area. Results. There were 30 patients with 44 hepatic perfusion changes on CT scans (28 around liver focal lesions and 16 unrelated to focal lesions). Retrospectively, CEUS allowed recognition of 21 of 28 perifocal transient hepatic attenuation differences (THADs), 6 of 10 subsegmental THADs, 2 of 3 segmental THADs, and 1 of 3 lobar THADs. Only some of these abnormalities had been identified at the original CEUS examinations: 0 of 3 lobar THADs, 1 of 3 segmental THADs, 2 of 10 subsegmental THADs, and 16 of 28 perifocal THADs. Conclusions. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography can show hepatic perfusion abnormalities similar to those well known from CT literature, although with a lower sensitivity. Knowledge of this transient hepatic echogenicity difference phenomenon may be relevant for avoiding incorrect image interpretation or incorrect tumor size measurement and for eventually identifying occult vascular disorders such as venous thrombosis or fistulas.",
keywords = "Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, liver, Liver, focal lesions, Liver, perfusion, Liver, vascular abnormalities",
author = "Orlando Catalano and Fabio Sandomenico and Antonio Nunziata and Raso, {Mauro Mattace} and Paolo Vallone and Alfredo Siani",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "337--345",
journal = "Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine",
issn = "0278-4297",
publisher = "American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transient hepatic echogenicity difference on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography

T2 - Sonographic sign and pitfall

AU - Catalano, Orlando

AU - Sandomenico, Fabio

AU - Nunziata, Antonio

AU - Raso, Mauro Mattace

AU - Vallone, Paolo

AU - Siani, Alfredo

PY - 2007/3

Y1 - 2007/3

N2 - Objective. The purpose of this study was to report and analyze a new contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic (CEUS) imaging finding, the transient hepatic echogenicity difference due to perfusion changes, using computed tomography (CT) as a reference standard. Methods. We retrospectively investigated the records of patients evaluated in a 2-year period, selecting those who had undergone both CT and CEUS within 15 days, who had CT evidence of a perfusion abnormality, and who had had a CEUS study that included the malperfused parenchymal area. Results. There were 30 patients with 44 hepatic perfusion changes on CT scans (28 around liver focal lesions and 16 unrelated to focal lesions). Retrospectively, CEUS allowed recognition of 21 of 28 perifocal transient hepatic attenuation differences (THADs), 6 of 10 subsegmental THADs, 2 of 3 segmental THADs, and 1 of 3 lobar THADs. Only some of these abnormalities had been identified at the original CEUS examinations: 0 of 3 lobar THADs, 1 of 3 segmental THADs, 2 of 10 subsegmental THADs, and 16 of 28 perifocal THADs. Conclusions. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography can show hepatic perfusion abnormalities similar to those well known from CT literature, although with a lower sensitivity. Knowledge of this transient hepatic echogenicity difference phenomenon may be relevant for avoiding incorrect image interpretation or incorrect tumor size measurement and for eventually identifying occult vascular disorders such as venous thrombosis or fistulas.

AB - Objective. The purpose of this study was to report and analyze a new contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic (CEUS) imaging finding, the transient hepatic echogenicity difference due to perfusion changes, using computed tomography (CT) as a reference standard. Methods. We retrospectively investigated the records of patients evaluated in a 2-year period, selecting those who had undergone both CT and CEUS within 15 days, who had CT evidence of a perfusion abnormality, and who had had a CEUS study that included the malperfused parenchymal area. Results. There were 30 patients with 44 hepatic perfusion changes on CT scans (28 around liver focal lesions and 16 unrelated to focal lesions). Retrospectively, CEUS allowed recognition of 21 of 28 perifocal transient hepatic attenuation differences (THADs), 6 of 10 subsegmental THADs, 2 of 3 segmental THADs, and 1 of 3 lobar THADs. Only some of these abnormalities had been identified at the original CEUS examinations: 0 of 3 lobar THADs, 1 of 3 segmental THADs, 2 of 10 subsegmental THADs, and 16 of 28 perifocal THADs. Conclusions. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography can show hepatic perfusion abnormalities similar to those well known from CT literature, although with a lower sensitivity. Knowledge of this transient hepatic echogenicity difference phenomenon may be relevant for avoiding incorrect image interpretation or incorrect tumor size measurement and for eventually identifying occult vascular disorders such as venous thrombosis or fistulas.

KW - Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, liver

KW - Liver, focal lesions

KW - Liver, perfusion

KW - Liver, vascular abnormalities

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33847644497&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33847644497&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 337

EP - 345

JO - Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

JF - Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

SN - 0278-4297

IS - 3

ER -