IPERTERMIA TRANSRETTALE VS TERMOTERAPIA TRANSURETRALE VS UROLUME WALLSTENT: VALUTAZIONE COMPARATIVA AL FOLLOW-UP DI 1 ANNO IN PAZIENTI CON IPERPLASIA PROSTATICA BENIGNA AD ALTO RISCHIO OPERATORIO

Translated title of the contribution: Transrectal hyperthermia versus transrectal thermotherapy versus urolume wallstent: Comparative evaluation of one year follow-up in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia at high operative risk

P. Bellinzoni, G. Guazzonni, F. Montorsi, F. Bergamaschi, P. Consonni, P. Rigatti

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Benign prostatic hyperplasia patients, at high operative risk, with a comparable preoperative clinical and urodynamic picture, were treated with transrectal hyperthermia (30 cases), transurethral thermotherapy (30 cases) or urolume wallstent (30 cases). Only urolume wallstent was able to resolve bladder outlet obstruction at one-year follow-up.

Translated title of the contributionTransrectal hyperthermia versus transrectal thermotherapy versus urolume wallstent: Comparative evaluation of one year follow-up in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia at high operative risk
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)129-130
Number of pages2
JournalActa Urologica Italica
Volume7
Issue numberSUPPL. 2
Publication statusPublished - 1993

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Transrectal hyperthermia versus transrectal thermotherapy versus urolume wallstent: Comparative evaluation of one year follow-up in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia at high operative risk'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this