Treatment choices for extremely preterm infants: An international perspective

R. De Leeuw, M. Cuttini, M. Nadai, I. Berbik, G. Hansen, A. Kucinskas, S. Lenoir, A. Levin, J. Persson, M. Rebagliato, M. Reid, M. Schroell, U. De Vonderweid, I. De Beaufort, M. Garel, M. Hills, M. Kaminski, H. G. Lenard, H. E. McHaffie, M. OrzalesiR. Saracci

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

194 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare treatment choices of neonatal physicians and nurses in 11 European countries for a hypothetical case of extreme prematurity (24 weeks' gestational age, birth weight of 560 g, Apgar score of 1 at 1 minute). Study design: An anonymous, self-administered questionnaire was completed by 1401 physicians (response rate, 89%) and 3425 nurses (response rate, 86%) from a large, representative sample of 143 European neonatal intensive care units. Italy, Spain, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Great Britain, Sweden, Hungary, Estonia, and Lithuania participated. Results: Most physicians in every country but the Netherlands would resuscitate this baby and start intensive care. On subsequent deterioration of clinical conditions caused by a severe intraventricular hemorrhage, attitudes diverge: most neonatologists in Germany, Italy, Estonia, and Hungary would favor continuation of intensive care, whereas in the other countries some form of limitation of treatment would be the preferred choice. Parental wishes appear to play a role especially in Great Britain and the Netherlands. Nurses are more prone than doctors to withhold resuscitation in the delivery room and to ask parental opinion regarding subsequent treatment choices. Conclusion: An extremely premature infant is regarded as viable by most physicians, whereas after deterioration of the clinical conditions decision-making patterns vary according to country. These findings have implications for the ethical debate surrounding treatment of infants of borderline viability and for the interpretation and comparison of international statistics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)608-615
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Pediatrics
Volume137
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Extremely Premature Infants
Internationality
Netherlands
Estonia
Physicians
Hungary
Critical Care
Italy
Germany
Luxembourg
Nurses
Delivery Rooms
Lithuania
Apgar Score
Neonatal Intensive Care Units
Therapeutics
Sweden
Birth Weight
Resuscitation
Spain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

De Leeuw, R., Cuttini, M., Nadai, M., Berbik, I., Hansen, G., Kucinskas, A., ... Saracci, R. (2000). Treatment choices for extremely preterm infants: An international perspective. Journal of Pediatrics, 137(5), 608-615. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpd.2000.109144

Treatment choices for extremely preterm infants : An international perspective. / De Leeuw, R.; Cuttini, M.; Nadai, M.; Berbik, I.; Hansen, G.; Kucinskas, A.; Lenoir, S.; Levin, A.; Persson, J.; Rebagliato, M.; Reid, M.; Schroell, M.; De Vonderweid, U.; De Beaufort, I.; Garel, M.; Hills, M.; Kaminski, M.; Lenard, H. G.; McHaffie, H. E.; Orzalesi, M.; Saracci, R.

In: Journal of Pediatrics, Vol. 137, No. 5, 2000, p. 608-615.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

De Leeuw, R, Cuttini, M, Nadai, M, Berbik, I, Hansen, G, Kucinskas, A, Lenoir, S, Levin, A, Persson, J, Rebagliato, M, Reid, M, Schroell, M, De Vonderweid, U, De Beaufort, I, Garel, M, Hills, M, Kaminski, M, Lenard, HG, McHaffie, HE, Orzalesi, M & Saracci, R 2000, 'Treatment choices for extremely preterm infants: An international perspective', Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 137, no. 5, pp. 608-615. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpd.2000.109144
De Leeuw, R. ; Cuttini, M. ; Nadai, M. ; Berbik, I. ; Hansen, G. ; Kucinskas, A. ; Lenoir, S. ; Levin, A. ; Persson, J. ; Rebagliato, M. ; Reid, M. ; Schroell, M. ; De Vonderweid, U. ; De Beaufort, I. ; Garel, M. ; Hills, M. ; Kaminski, M. ; Lenard, H. G. ; McHaffie, H. E. ; Orzalesi, M. ; Saracci, R. / Treatment choices for extremely preterm infants : An international perspective. In: Journal of Pediatrics. 2000 ; Vol. 137, No. 5. pp. 608-615.
@article{175e72d839ab42beba73a86aac37a3bb,
title = "Treatment choices for extremely preterm infants: An international perspective",
abstract = "Objective: To compare treatment choices of neonatal physicians and nurses in 11 European countries for a hypothetical case of extreme prematurity (24 weeks' gestational age, birth weight of 560 g, Apgar score of 1 at 1 minute). Study design: An anonymous, self-administered questionnaire was completed by 1401 physicians (response rate, 89{\%}) and 3425 nurses (response rate, 86{\%}) from a large, representative sample of 143 European neonatal intensive care units. Italy, Spain, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Great Britain, Sweden, Hungary, Estonia, and Lithuania participated. Results: Most physicians in every country but the Netherlands would resuscitate this baby and start intensive care. On subsequent deterioration of clinical conditions caused by a severe intraventricular hemorrhage, attitudes diverge: most neonatologists in Germany, Italy, Estonia, and Hungary would favor continuation of intensive care, whereas in the other countries some form of limitation of treatment would be the preferred choice. Parental wishes appear to play a role especially in Great Britain and the Netherlands. Nurses are more prone than doctors to withhold resuscitation in the delivery room and to ask parental opinion regarding subsequent treatment choices. Conclusion: An extremely premature infant is regarded as viable by most physicians, whereas after deterioration of the clinical conditions decision-making patterns vary according to country. These findings have implications for the ethical debate surrounding treatment of infants of borderline viability and for the interpretation and comparison of international statistics.",
author = "{De Leeuw}, R. and M. Cuttini and M. Nadai and I. Berbik and G. Hansen and A. Kucinskas and S. Lenoir and A. Levin and J. Persson and M. Rebagliato and M. Reid and M. Schroell and {De Vonderweid}, U. and {De Beaufort}, I. and M. Garel and M. Hills and M. Kaminski and Lenard, {H. G.} and McHaffie, {H. E.} and M. Orzalesi and R. Saracci",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1067/mpd.2000.109144",
language = "English",
volume = "137",
pages = "608--615",
journal = "Journal of Pediatrics",
issn = "0022-3476",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Treatment choices for extremely preterm infants

T2 - An international perspective

AU - De Leeuw, R.

AU - Cuttini, M.

AU - Nadai, M.

AU - Berbik, I.

AU - Hansen, G.

AU - Kucinskas, A.

AU - Lenoir, S.

AU - Levin, A.

AU - Persson, J.

AU - Rebagliato, M.

AU - Reid, M.

AU - Schroell, M.

AU - De Vonderweid, U.

AU - De Beaufort, I.

AU - Garel, M.

AU - Hills, M.

AU - Kaminski, M.

AU - Lenard, H. G.

AU - McHaffie, H. E.

AU - Orzalesi, M.

AU - Saracci, R.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Objective: To compare treatment choices of neonatal physicians and nurses in 11 European countries for a hypothetical case of extreme prematurity (24 weeks' gestational age, birth weight of 560 g, Apgar score of 1 at 1 minute). Study design: An anonymous, self-administered questionnaire was completed by 1401 physicians (response rate, 89%) and 3425 nurses (response rate, 86%) from a large, representative sample of 143 European neonatal intensive care units. Italy, Spain, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Great Britain, Sweden, Hungary, Estonia, and Lithuania participated. Results: Most physicians in every country but the Netherlands would resuscitate this baby and start intensive care. On subsequent deterioration of clinical conditions caused by a severe intraventricular hemorrhage, attitudes diverge: most neonatologists in Germany, Italy, Estonia, and Hungary would favor continuation of intensive care, whereas in the other countries some form of limitation of treatment would be the preferred choice. Parental wishes appear to play a role especially in Great Britain and the Netherlands. Nurses are more prone than doctors to withhold resuscitation in the delivery room and to ask parental opinion regarding subsequent treatment choices. Conclusion: An extremely premature infant is regarded as viable by most physicians, whereas after deterioration of the clinical conditions decision-making patterns vary according to country. These findings have implications for the ethical debate surrounding treatment of infants of borderline viability and for the interpretation and comparison of international statistics.

AB - Objective: To compare treatment choices of neonatal physicians and nurses in 11 European countries for a hypothetical case of extreme prematurity (24 weeks' gestational age, birth weight of 560 g, Apgar score of 1 at 1 minute). Study design: An anonymous, self-administered questionnaire was completed by 1401 physicians (response rate, 89%) and 3425 nurses (response rate, 86%) from a large, representative sample of 143 European neonatal intensive care units. Italy, Spain, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Great Britain, Sweden, Hungary, Estonia, and Lithuania participated. Results: Most physicians in every country but the Netherlands would resuscitate this baby and start intensive care. On subsequent deterioration of clinical conditions caused by a severe intraventricular hemorrhage, attitudes diverge: most neonatologists in Germany, Italy, Estonia, and Hungary would favor continuation of intensive care, whereas in the other countries some form of limitation of treatment would be the preferred choice. Parental wishes appear to play a role especially in Great Britain and the Netherlands. Nurses are more prone than doctors to withhold resuscitation in the delivery room and to ask parental opinion regarding subsequent treatment choices. Conclusion: An extremely premature infant is regarded as viable by most physicians, whereas after deterioration of the clinical conditions decision-making patterns vary according to country. These findings have implications for the ethical debate surrounding treatment of infants of borderline viability and for the interpretation and comparison of international statistics.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033730402&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033730402&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1067/mpd.2000.109144

DO - 10.1067/mpd.2000.109144

M3 - Article

C2 - 11060524

AN - SCOPUS:0033730402

VL - 137

SP - 608

EP - 615

JO - Journal of Pediatrics

JF - Journal of Pediatrics

SN - 0022-3476

IS - 5

ER -