Purpose: To evaluate safety and outcomes of tubeless PCNL in comparison with standard PCNL. Materials and Methods: Since June 2002 we have performed 99 tubeless PCNL. Tubeless technique involves antegrade placement of a 6Fr double-J stent without nephrostomy tube at the end of the procedure. This series has been compared with a total of 110 patients in which revision of operative reports ruled out the presence of intraoperative conditions necessary to candidate a patient to tubeless procedure but standard PCNL was performed because prior to its introduction or because of surgeon's attitude afterward. Mean stone burden was 5.4 for standard group and 4.9 cm2 for tubeless group respectively. Mean BMI was 24.1 in the first group and 23.6 in the second one. In this retrospective study, complications rate, postoperative pain, length of hospitalization and convalescence were evaluated by chart review. Results: Hematocrit drop did not differ significantly between tubeless PCNL and standard PCNL (5.5% vs 5.90%). Conversely, there was statistically significant difference between tubeless and standard PCNL in terms of the amount of analgesics (49.5 vs. 84.2 mg), immediate postoperative patients' discomfort, hospitalization (2.2 vs 5.3 days) and time to resume normal activities (11.0 vs 16.5 days). Conclusions: In our series, tubeless approach did not determine increase in complication rate. Conversely, tubeless PCNL reduced analgesics' requirement, patients' discomfort, hospitalization and time to recovery. As such, at our Institution, tubeless PCNL has become routine procedure that actually is feasible in almost 2/3 of renal calculi suitable for percutaneous treatment.
|Number of pages||3|
|Journal||Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia|
|Publication status||Published - Mar 2010|
- Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
- Tubeless approach
ASJC Scopus subject areas