Tumor measurements on computed tomographic images of non-small cell lung cancer were similar among cancer professionals from different specialties

Francesco Grossi, Ornella Belvedere, Gianpiero Fasola, Tino Ceschia, Stefano Meduri, Angela Sibau, Cosimo Sacco, Massimo Bazzocchi, Giovanni Talmassons, Angelo Morelli, Fabio Barbone, Alberto Sobrero

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective In this study, we addressed the influence of the observer's background and experience on the accuracy of imaging-based tumor measurements. The consistency of measures with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) vs. WHO criteria is also reported. Study design and setting Twenty-five observers (five radiologists, five thoracic surgeons, five radiotherapists, five pulmonologists, and five medical oncologists) were asked to measure three lesions on selected serial chest computed tomographic images from three non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. The observers were asked to measure the longest diameter (RECIST), along with its perpendicular diameter (WHO criteria). Measurements by radiologists were used as reference values. Results There was no significant difference in the accuracy of measurements among the different groups. The highest intraobserver consistency was achieved by radiologists. Neither familiarity with measuring tumor lesions nor years since the MD degree correlated with measurement accuracy. A comparison of RECIST and WHO criteria showed consistent response ratings (κ=.74, CI 95%=.57-.91). Conclusion Measurements of selected lesions were consistent among specialists, suggesting that assessment of tumor response is reliable even when it is not done by radiologists.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)804-808
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume57
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2004

Fingerprint

Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
Neoplasms
Thorax
Reference Values
Drug Therapy
Radiologists
Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors

Keywords

  • Interdisciplinary comparison
  • Lung cancer
  • RECIST
  • Tumor measurement
  • WHO criteria

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Tumor measurements on computed tomographic images of non-small cell lung cancer were similar among cancer professionals from different specialties. / Grossi, Francesco; Belvedere, Ornella; Fasola, Gianpiero; Ceschia, Tino; Meduri, Stefano; Sibau, Angela; Sacco, Cosimo; Bazzocchi, Massimo; Talmassons, Giovanni; Morelli, Angelo; Barbone, Fabio; Sobrero, Alberto.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 57, No. 8, 08.2004, p. 804-808.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Grossi, Francesco ; Belvedere, Ornella ; Fasola, Gianpiero ; Ceschia, Tino ; Meduri, Stefano ; Sibau, Angela ; Sacco, Cosimo ; Bazzocchi, Massimo ; Talmassons, Giovanni ; Morelli, Angelo ; Barbone, Fabio ; Sobrero, Alberto. / Tumor measurements on computed tomographic images of non-small cell lung cancer were similar among cancer professionals from different specialties. In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2004 ; Vol. 57, No. 8. pp. 804-808.
@article{5ad8065b34fb4553bacad7b231ffc4c7,
title = "Tumor measurements on computed tomographic images of non-small cell lung cancer were similar among cancer professionals from different specialties",
abstract = "Objective In this study, we addressed the influence of the observer's background and experience on the accuracy of imaging-based tumor measurements. The consistency of measures with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) vs. WHO criteria is also reported. Study design and setting Twenty-five observers (five radiologists, five thoracic surgeons, five radiotherapists, five pulmonologists, and five medical oncologists) were asked to measure three lesions on selected serial chest computed tomographic images from three non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. The observers were asked to measure the longest diameter (RECIST), along with its perpendicular diameter (WHO criteria). Measurements by radiologists were used as reference values. Results There was no significant difference in the accuracy of measurements among the different groups. The highest intraobserver consistency was achieved by radiologists. Neither familiarity with measuring tumor lesions nor years since the MD degree correlated with measurement accuracy. A comparison of RECIST and WHO criteria showed consistent response ratings (κ=.74, CI 95{\%}=.57-.91). Conclusion Measurements of selected lesions were consistent among specialists, suggesting that assessment of tumor response is reliable even when it is not done by radiologists.",
keywords = "Interdisciplinary comparison, Lung cancer, RECIST, Tumor measurement, WHO criteria",
author = "Francesco Grossi and Ornella Belvedere and Gianpiero Fasola and Tino Ceschia and Stefano Meduri and Angela Sibau and Cosimo Sacco and Massimo Bazzocchi and Giovanni Talmassons and Angelo Morelli and Fabio Barbone and Alberto Sobrero",
year = "2004",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.12.020",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "804--808",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tumor measurements on computed tomographic images of non-small cell lung cancer were similar among cancer professionals from different specialties

AU - Grossi, Francesco

AU - Belvedere, Ornella

AU - Fasola, Gianpiero

AU - Ceschia, Tino

AU - Meduri, Stefano

AU - Sibau, Angela

AU - Sacco, Cosimo

AU - Bazzocchi, Massimo

AU - Talmassons, Giovanni

AU - Morelli, Angelo

AU - Barbone, Fabio

AU - Sobrero, Alberto

PY - 2004/8

Y1 - 2004/8

N2 - Objective In this study, we addressed the influence of the observer's background and experience on the accuracy of imaging-based tumor measurements. The consistency of measures with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) vs. WHO criteria is also reported. Study design and setting Twenty-five observers (five radiologists, five thoracic surgeons, five radiotherapists, five pulmonologists, and five medical oncologists) were asked to measure three lesions on selected serial chest computed tomographic images from three non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. The observers were asked to measure the longest diameter (RECIST), along with its perpendicular diameter (WHO criteria). Measurements by radiologists were used as reference values. Results There was no significant difference in the accuracy of measurements among the different groups. The highest intraobserver consistency was achieved by radiologists. Neither familiarity with measuring tumor lesions nor years since the MD degree correlated with measurement accuracy. A comparison of RECIST and WHO criteria showed consistent response ratings (κ=.74, CI 95%=.57-.91). Conclusion Measurements of selected lesions were consistent among specialists, suggesting that assessment of tumor response is reliable even when it is not done by radiologists.

AB - Objective In this study, we addressed the influence of the observer's background and experience on the accuracy of imaging-based tumor measurements. The consistency of measures with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) vs. WHO criteria is also reported. Study design and setting Twenty-five observers (five radiologists, five thoracic surgeons, five radiotherapists, five pulmonologists, and five medical oncologists) were asked to measure three lesions on selected serial chest computed tomographic images from three non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. The observers were asked to measure the longest diameter (RECIST), along with its perpendicular diameter (WHO criteria). Measurements by radiologists were used as reference values. Results There was no significant difference in the accuracy of measurements among the different groups. The highest intraobserver consistency was achieved by radiologists. Neither familiarity with measuring tumor lesions nor years since the MD degree correlated with measurement accuracy. A comparison of RECIST and WHO criteria showed consistent response ratings (κ=.74, CI 95%=.57-.91). Conclusion Measurements of selected lesions were consistent among specialists, suggesting that assessment of tumor response is reliable even when it is not done by radiologists.

KW - Interdisciplinary comparison

KW - Lung cancer

KW - RECIST

KW - Tumor measurement

KW - WHO criteria

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=5644224428&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=5644224428&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.12.020

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.12.020

M3 - Article

C2 - 15485732

AN - SCOPUS:5644224428

VL - 57

SP - 804

EP - 808

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 8

ER -