Two-level total lumbar disc replacement

Mario Di Silvestre, Georgios Bakaloudis, Francesco Lolli, Francesco Vommaro, Patrizio Parisini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Total lumbar disc replacement (TDR) has been widely used as a treatment option for 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease. However, recent studies have presented conflicting results and some authors concluded that outcome deteriorated when disc replacement was performed bisegmentally, with an increase of complications for bisegmental replacements in comparison with monosegmental disc arthroplasty. The goal of the present retrospective study is to investigate results in a group of patients who have received bisegmental TDR with SB Charitè III artificial disc for degenerative disc disease with a minimum follow-up of 3 years, and to compare the results of 2-level disc replacement versus 1-level patients treated with the same prosthesis. A total of 32 patients had at least 3-years follow-up and were reviewed. The average age of the patients was 38.5 years. There were 11 males and 21 females. About 16 patients received 2-level TDR (SB Charitè III) and 16 received 1-level TDR (SB Charitè III). Both radiographic and functional outcome analysis, including patient's satisfaction, was performed. There were no signs of degenerative changes of the adjacent segments in any case of the 2- or 1-level TDR. There was no statistically significant difference between 2- and 1-level TDR both at 12 months and at 3-years follow-up on functional outcome scores. There was a statistically insignificant difference concerning the patients satisfaction between 1- and 2-level surgeries at the last follow-up (P = 0.46). In the 2-level TDR patients, there were 5 minor complications (31.25%), whereas major complications occurred in 4 more patients (25%) and required a new surgery in 2 cases (12.5%). In the 1-level cases there were 2 minor complications (12.5%) and 2 major complications (12.5%) and a new revision surgery was required in 1 patient (6.25%). In conclusion, the use of 2-level disc replacement at last follow-up presented a higher incidence of complications than in cases with 1-level replacement. At the same time it was impossible to delineate a clear difference in evaluating the questionnaires between the follow-up results of patients receiving 2- and 1-level TDR: the 2-level group presented slightly lower scores at follow-up, but none was statistically significant.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Spine Journal
Volume18
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2009

Fingerprint

Total Disc Replacement
Patient Satisfaction
Reoperation
Arthroplasty
Prostheses and Implants
Retrospective Studies

Keywords

  • Bisegmental disc replacement
  • Degenerative disc disease
  • Lumbar spine
  • Total disc replacement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Di Silvestre, M., Bakaloudis, G., Lolli, F., Vommaro, F., & Parisini, P. (2009). Two-level total lumbar disc replacement. European Spine Journal, 18(SUPPL. 1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-0982-0

Two-level total lumbar disc replacement. / Di Silvestre, Mario; Bakaloudis, Georgios; Lolli, Francesco; Vommaro, Francesco; Parisini, Patrizio.

In: European Spine Journal, Vol. 18, No. SUPPL. 1, 06.2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Di Silvestre, M, Bakaloudis, G, Lolli, F, Vommaro, F & Parisini, P 2009, 'Two-level total lumbar disc replacement', European Spine Journal, vol. 18, no. SUPPL. 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-0982-0
Di Silvestre M, Bakaloudis G, Lolli F, Vommaro F, Parisini P. Two-level total lumbar disc replacement. European Spine Journal. 2009 Jun;18(SUPPL. 1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-0982-0
Di Silvestre, Mario ; Bakaloudis, Georgios ; Lolli, Francesco ; Vommaro, Francesco ; Parisini, Patrizio. / Two-level total lumbar disc replacement. In: European Spine Journal. 2009 ; Vol. 18, No. SUPPL. 1.
@article{3db38633ce414d45b082891dc36ea94e,
title = "Two-level total lumbar disc replacement",
abstract = "Total lumbar disc replacement (TDR) has been widely used as a treatment option for 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease. However, recent studies have presented conflicting results and some authors concluded that outcome deteriorated when disc replacement was performed bisegmentally, with an increase of complications for bisegmental replacements in comparison with monosegmental disc arthroplasty. The goal of the present retrospective study is to investigate results in a group of patients who have received bisegmental TDR with SB Charit{\`e} III artificial disc for degenerative disc disease with a minimum follow-up of 3 years, and to compare the results of 2-level disc replacement versus 1-level patients treated with the same prosthesis. A total of 32 patients had at least 3-years follow-up and were reviewed. The average age of the patients was 38.5 years. There were 11 males and 21 females. About 16 patients received 2-level TDR (SB Charit{\`e} III) and 16 received 1-level TDR (SB Charit{\`e} III). Both radiographic and functional outcome analysis, including patient's satisfaction, was performed. There were no signs of degenerative changes of the adjacent segments in any case of the 2- or 1-level TDR. There was no statistically significant difference between 2- and 1-level TDR both at 12 months and at 3-years follow-up on functional outcome scores. There was a statistically insignificant difference concerning the patients satisfaction between 1- and 2-level surgeries at the last follow-up (P = 0.46). In the 2-level TDR patients, there were 5 minor complications (31.25{\%}), whereas major complications occurred in 4 more patients (25{\%}) and required a new surgery in 2 cases (12.5{\%}). In the 1-level cases there were 2 minor complications (12.5{\%}) and 2 major complications (12.5{\%}) and a new revision surgery was required in 1 patient (6.25{\%}). In conclusion, the use of 2-level disc replacement at last follow-up presented a higher incidence of complications than in cases with 1-level replacement. At the same time it was impossible to delineate a clear difference in evaluating the questionnaires between the follow-up results of patients receiving 2- and 1-level TDR: the 2-level group presented slightly lower scores at follow-up, but none was statistically significant.",
keywords = "Bisegmental disc replacement, Degenerative disc disease, Lumbar spine, Total disc replacement",
author = "{Di Silvestre}, Mario and Georgios Bakaloudis and Francesco Lolli and Francesco Vommaro and Patrizio Parisini",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s00586-009-0982-0",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
journal = "European Spine Journal",
issn = "0940-6719",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "SUPPL. 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two-level total lumbar disc replacement

AU - Di Silvestre, Mario

AU - Bakaloudis, Georgios

AU - Lolli, Francesco

AU - Vommaro, Francesco

AU - Parisini, Patrizio

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - Total lumbar disc replacement (TDR) has been widely used as a treatment option for 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease. However, recent studies have presented conflicting results and some authors concluded that outcome deteriorated when disc replacement was performed bisegmentally, with an increase of complications for bisegmental replacements in comparison with monosegmental disc arthroplasty. The goal of the present retrospective study is to investigate results in a group of patients who have received bisegmental TDR with SB Charitè III artificial disc for degenerative disc disease with a minimum follow-up of 3 years, and to compare the results of 2-level disc replacement versus 1-level patients treated with the same prosthesis. A total of 32 patients had at least 3-years follow-up and were reviewed. The average age of the patients was 38.5 years. There were 11 males and 21 females. About 16 patients received 2-level TDR (SB Charitè III) and 16 received 1-level TDR (SB Charitè III). Both radiographic and functional outcome analysis, including patient's satisfaction, was performed. There were no signs of degenerative changes of the adjacent segments in any case of the 2- or 1-level TDR. There was no statistically significant difference between 2- and 1-level TDR both at 12 months and at 3-years follow-up on functional outcome scores. There was a statistically insignificant difference concerning the patients satisfaction between 1- and 2-level surgeries at the last follow-up (P = 0.46). In the 2-level TDR patients, there were 5 minor complications (31.25%), whereas major complications occurred in 4 more patients (25%) and required a new surgery in 2 cases (12.5%). In the 1-level cases there were 2 minor complications (12.5%) and 2 major complications (12.5%) and a new revision surgery was required in 1 patient (6.25%). In conclusion, the use of 2-level disc replacement at last follow-up presented a higher incidence of complications than in cases with 1-level replacement. At the same time it was impossible to delineate a clear difference in evaluating the questionnaires between the follow-up results of patients receiving 2- and 1-level TDR: the 2-level group presented slightly lower scores at follow-up, but none was statistically significant.

AB - Total lumbar disc replacement (TDR) has been widely used as a treatment option for 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease. However, recent studies have presented conflicting results and some authors concluded that outcome deteriorated when disc replacement was performed bisegmentally, with an increase of complications for bisegmental replacements in comparison with monosegmental disc arthroplasty. The goal of the present retrospective study is to investigate results in a group of patients who have received bisegmental TDR with SB Charitè III artificial disc for degenerative disc disease with a minimum follow-up of 3 years, and to compare the results of 2-level disc replacement versus 1-level patients treated with the same prosthesis. A total of 32 patients had at least 3-years follow-up and were reviewed. The average age of the patients was 38.5 years. There were 11 males and 21 females. About 16 patients received 2-level TDR (SB Charitè III) and 16 received 1-level TDR (SB Charitè III). Both radiographic and functional outcome analysis, including patient's satisfaction, was performed. There were no signs of degenerative changes of the adjacent segments in any case of the 2- or 1-level TDR. There was no statistically significant difference between 2- and 1-level TDR both at 12 months and at 3-years follow-up on functional outcome scores. There was a statistically insignificant difference concerning the patients satisfaction between 1- and 2-level surgeries at the last follow-up (P = 0.46). In the 2-level TDR patients, there were 5 minor complications (31.25%), whereas major complications occurred in 4 more patients (25%) and required a new surgery in 2 cases (12.5%). In the 1-level cases there were 2 minor complications (12.5%) and 2 major complications (12.5%) and a new revision surgery was required in 1 patient (6.25%). In conclusion, the use of 2-level disc replacement at last follow-up presented a higher incidence of complications than in cases with 1-level replacement. At the same time it was impossible to delineate a clear difference in evaluating the questionnaires between the follow-up results of patients receiving 2- and 1-level TDR: the 2-level group presented slightly lower scores at follow-up, but none was statistically significant.

KW - Bisegmental disc replacement

KW - Degenerative disc disease

KW - Lumbar spine

KW - Total disc replacement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649170459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67649170459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00586-009-0982-0

DO - 10.1007/s00586-009-0982-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 19399536

AN - SCOPUS:67649170459

VL - 18

JO - European Spine Journal

JF - European Spine Journal

SN - 0940-6719

IS - SUPPL. 1

ER -