Ultra-conservative fertility-sparing strategy for bilateral borderline ovarian tumours: An 11-year follow-up

Stefano Palomba, Angela Falbo, Serena Del Negro, Morena Rocca, Tiziana Russo, Francesco Cariati, Gianluca Annunziata, Achille Tolino, Pierosandro Tagliaferri, Fulvio Zullo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: This is a prospective long-term extension study of a randomized controlled trial aimed to assess the risk-benefit ratio of an ultra-conservative fertility-sparing approach in patients with bilateral borderline ovarian tumours (BOTs). Methods: The experimental group (n = 15) was treated with an ultra-conservative surgical approach consisting of bilateral cystectomy, whereas the control group (n = 17) received a less conservative surgery consisting of oophorectomy plus controlateral cystectomy alone. All patients received a complete laparoscopic staging followed by a fertility enhancement programme. Patients who completed childbearing were treated with a non-conservative standard treatment at the first recurrence. Results: After a follow-up period of 128 (9 interquartile range (IQR); 115-150 range) and 132 (7 IQR; 117-152 range) months for the experimental and control groups, respectively (P = 0.25), the time to first baby-in-arm (P <0.02) and the relative rate (RR) of baby-in-arm (8.05 [95 confidence interval (CI), 1.20-9.66; P <0.01]) were significantly lower and higher, respectively, for the experimental compared with the control group. Although the time to first recurrence was significently (P <0.01) shorter for the experimental group, in the regression analysis the difference did not reach the statistic significance (P = 0.14), and the RR of recurrence (1.23 [95 CI, 0.62-3.17; P = 0.41]) was not significant. Finally the number needed to treat for pregnancy was three, the number needed to harm for radical surgery was only two. Conclusions: The ultra-conservative fertility-sparing approach is more effective than the standard approach in terms of reproductive outcomes, but presents a higher oncological risk.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1966-1972
Number of pages7
JournalHuman Reproduction
Volume25
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2010

Fingerprint

Fertility
Cystectomy
Recurrence
Control Groups
Confidence Intervals
Numbers Needed To Treat
Neoplasms
Ovariectomy
Randomized Controlled Trials
Odds Ratio
Regression Analysis
Pregnancy
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • BOTs
  • fertility-sparing strategy
  • pregnancy
  • recurrence
  • ultra-conservative surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology
  • Reproductive Medicine

Cite this

Palomba, S., Falbo, A., Del Negro, S., Rocca, M., Russo, T., Cariati, F., ... Zullo, F. (2010). Ultra-conservative fertility-sparing strategy for bilateral borderline ovarian tumours: An 11-year follow-up. Human Reproduction, 25(8), 1966-1972. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq159

Ultra-conservative fertility-sparing strategy for bilateral borderline ovarian tumours : An 11-year follow-up. / Palomba, Stefano; Falbo, Angela; Del Negro, Serena; Rocca, Morena; Russo, Tiziana; Cariati, Francesco; Annunziata, Gianluca; Tolino, Achille; Tagliaferri, Pierosandro; Zullo, Fulvio.

In: Human Reproduction, Vol. 25, No. 8, 08.2010, p. 1966-1972.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Palomba, S, Falbo, A, Del Negro, S, Rocca, M, Russo, T, Cariati, F, Annunziata, G, Tolino, A, Tagliaferri, P & Zullo, F 2010, 'Ultra-conservative fertility-sparing strategy for bilateral borderline ovarian tumours: An 11-year follow-up', Human Reproduction, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1966-1972. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq159
Palomba, Stefano ; Falbo, Angela ; Del Negro, Serena ; Rocca, Morena ; Russo, Tiziana ; Cariati, Francesco ; Annunziata, Gianluca ; Tolino, Achille ; Tagliaferri, Pierosandro ; Zullo, Fulvio. / Ultra-conservative fertility-sparing strategy for bilateral borderline ovarian tumours : An 11-year follow-up. In: Human Reproduction. 2010 ; Vol. 25, No. 8. pp. 1966-1972.
@article{f291da0354d04bec8cce8b0f94d79a0b,
title = "Ultra-conservative fertility-sparing strategy for bilateral borderline ovarian tumours: An 11-year follow-up",
abstract = "Background: This is a prospective long-term extension study of a randomized controlled trial aimed to assess the risk-benefit ratio of an ultra-conservative fertility-sparing approach in patients with bilateral borderline ovarian tumours (BOTs). Methods: The experimental group (n = 15) was treated with an ultra-conservative surgical approach consisting of bilateral cystectomy, whereas the control group (n = 17) received a less conservative surgery consisting of oophorectomy plus controlateral cystectomy alone. All patients received a complete laparoscopic staging followed by a fertility enhancement programme. Patients who completed childbearing were treated with a non-conservative standard treatment at the first recurrence. Results: After a follow-up period of 128 (9 interquartile range (IQR); 115-150 range) and 132 (7 IQR; 117-152 range) months for the experimental and control groups, respectively (P = 0.25), the time to first baby-in-arm (P <0.02) and the relative rate (RR) of baby-in-arm (8.05 [95 confidence interval (CI), 1.20-9.66; P <0.01]) were significantly lower and higher, respectively, for the experimental compared with the control group. Although the time to first recurrence was significently (P <0.01) shorter for the experimental group, in the regression analysis the difference did not reach the statistic significance (P = 0.14), and the RR of recurrence (1.23 [95 CI, 0.62-3.17; P = 0.41]) was not significant. Finally the number needed to treat for pregnancy was three, the number needed to harm for radical surgery was only two. Conclusions: The ultra-conservative fertility-sparing approach is more effective than the standard approach in terms of reproductive outcomes, but presents a higher oncological risk.",
keywords = "BOTs, fertility-sparing strategy, pregnancy, recurrence, ultra-conservative surgery",
author = "Stefano Palomba and Angela Falbo and {Del Negro}, Serena and Morena Rocca and Tiziana Russo and Francesco Cariati and Gianluca Annunziata and Achille Tolino and Pierosandro Tagliaferri and Fulvio Zullo",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1093/humrep/deq159",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "1966--1972",
journal = "Human Reproduction",
issn = "0268-1161",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ultra-conservative fertility-sparing strategy for bilateral borderline ovarian tumours

T2 - An 11-year follow-up

AU - Palomba, Stefano

AU - Falbo, Angela

AU - Del Negro, Serena

AU - Rocca, Morena

AU - Russo, Tiziana

AU - Cariati, Francesco

AU - Annunziata, Gianluca

AU - Tolino, Achille

AU - Tagliaferri, Pierosandro

AU - Zullo, Fulvio

PY - 2010/8

Y1 - 2010/8

N2 - Background: This is a prospective long-term extension study of a randomized controlled trial aimed to assess the risk-benefit ratio of an ultra-conservative fertility-sparing approach in patients with bilateral borderline ovarian tumours (BOTs). Methods: The experimental group (n = 15) was treated with an ultra-conservative surgical approach consisting of bilateral cystectomy, whereas the control group (n = 17) received a less conservative surgery consisting of oophorectomy plus controlateral cystectomy alone. All patients received a complete laparoscopic staging followed by a fertility enhancement programme. Patients who completed childbearing were treated with a non-conservative standard treatment at the first recurrence. Results: After a follow-up period of 128 (9 interquartile range (IQR); 115-150 range) and 132 (7 IQR; 117-152 range) months for the experimental and control groups, respectively (P = 0.25), the time to first baby-in-arm (P <0.02) and the relative rate (RR) of baby-in-arm (8.05 [95 confidence interval (CI), 1.20-9.66; P <0.01]) were significantly lower and higher, respectively, for the experimental compared with the control group. Although the time to first recurrence was significently (P <0.01) shorter for the experimental group, in the regression analysis the difference did not reach the statistic significance (P = 0.14), and the RR of recurrence (1.23 [95 CI, 0.62-3.17; P = 0.41]) was not significant. Finally the number needed to treat for pregnancy was three, the number needed to harm for radical surgery was only two. Conclusions: The ultra-conservative fertility-sparing approach is more effective than the standard approach in terms of reproductive outcomes, but presents a higher oncological risk.

AB - Background: This is a prospective long-term extension study of a randomized controlled trial aimed to assess the risk-benefit ratio of an ultra-conservative fertility-sparing approach in patients with bilateral borderline ovarian tumours (BOTs). Methods: The experimental group (n = 15) was treated with an ultra-conservative surgical approach consisting of bilateral cystectomy, whereas the control group (n = 17) received a less conservative surgery consisting of oophorectomy plus controlateral cystectomy alone. All patients received a complete laparoscopic staging followed by a fertility enhancement programme. Patients who completed childbearing were treated with a non-conservative standard treatment at the first recurrence. Results: After a follow-up period of 128 (9 interquartile range (IQR); 115-150 range) and 132 (7 IQR; 117-152 range) months for the experimental and control groups, respectively (P = 0.25), the time to first baby-in-arm (P <0.02) and the relative rate (RR) of baby-in-arm (8.05 [95 confidence interval (CI), 1.20-9.66; P <0.01]) were significantly lower and higher, respectively, for the experimental compared with the control group. Although the time to first recurrence was significently (P <0.01) shorter for the experimental group, in the regression analysis the difference did not reach the statistic significance (P = 0.14), and the RR of recurrence (1.23 [95 CI, 0.62-3.17; P = 0.41]) was not significant. Finally the number needed to treat for pregnancy was three, the number needed to harm for radical surgery was only two. Conclusions: The ultra-conservative fertility-sparing approach is more effective than the standard approach in terms of reproductive outcomes, but presents a higher oncological risk.

KW - BOTs

KW - fertility-sparing strategy

KW - pregnancy

KW - recurrence

KW - ultra-conservative surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954992638&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954992638&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/humrep/deq159

DO - 10.1093/humrep/deq159

M3 - Article

C2 - 20573679

AN - SCOPUS:77954992638

VL - 25

SP - 1966

EP - 1972

JO - Human Reproduction

JF - Human Reproduction

SN - 0268-1161

IS - 8

ER -