Unconscious emotional memories and the right hemisphere

Guido Gainotti

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The problem of the possible relationships between hemispheric asymmetries and aspects of the psychoanalytic model of mind has been repeatedly raised during the past century. In a rather arbitrary manner, we could even say that this problem has passed through three distinct stages. In the first stage (roughly covering the first part of the twentieth century), psychoanalytically oriented authors, although acknowledging that some clinical phenomena could suggest a special link between aspects of psychoanalytical theory and the right hemisphere, substantially rejected the specificity of these relationships. In the second period, influenced by the influential work on split-brain patients of Sperry and co-workers [1], the interest that the right hemisphere could have for psychoanalysis has been explicitly acknowledged, but this has been made focusing attention more on cognitive than on emotional features and mapping onto the right and left hemispheres, in a rather global manner, two main constructs of the psychoanalytical theory, namely those of primary and secondary process [2, 3]. Finally, in the most recent period, Kandell's paper [4], stressing the need for an intimate relationship between psychoanalysis and cognitive neuroscience, has suggested a new way of investigating the links between hemispheric asymmetries and the psychoanalytic model of mind.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPsychoanalysis and Neuroscience
PublisherSpringer Milan
Pages151-173
Number of pages23
ISBN (Print)8847003342, 9788847003347
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Psychoanalytic Theory
Psychoanalysis
Split-Brain Procedure
Unconscious (Psychology)
Cognitive Neuroscience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Gainotti, G. (2006). Unconscious emotional memories and the right hemisphere. In Psychoanalysis and Neuroscience (pp. 151-173). Springer Milan. https://doi.org/10.1007/88-470-0550-7_6

Unconscious emotional memories and the right hemisphere. / Gainotti, Guido.

Psychoanalysis and Neuroscience. Springer Milan, 2006. p. 151-173.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Gainotti, G 2006, Unconscious emotional memories and the right hemisphere. in Psychoanalysis and Neuroscience. Springer Milan, pp. 151-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/88-470-0550-7_6
Gainotti G. Unconscious emotional memories and the right hemisphere. In Psychoanalysis and Neuroscience. Springer Milan. 2006. p. 151-173 https://doi.org/10.1007/88-470-0550-7_6
Gainotti, Guido. / Unconscious emotional memories and the right hemisphere. Psychoanalysis and Neuroscience. Springer Milan, 2006. pp. 151-173
@inbook{65ee4d0dd27b4cf4b91e93a91aa3c32f,
title = "Unconscious emotional memories and the right hemisphere",
abstract = "The problem of the possible relationships between hemispheric asymmetries and aspects of the psychoanalytic model of mind has been repeatedly raised during the past century. In a rather arbitrary manner, we could even say that this problem has passed through three distinct stages. In the first stage (roughly covering the first part of the twentieth century), psychoanalytically oriented authors, although acknowledging that some clinical phenomena could suggest a special link between aspects of psychoanalytical theory and the right hemisphere, substantially rejected the specificity of these relationships. In the second period, influenced by the influential work on split-brain patients of Sperry and co-workers [1], the interest that the right hemisphere could have for psychoanalysis has been explicitly acknowledged, but this has been made focusing attention more on cognitive than on emotional features and mapping onto the right and left hemispheres, in a rather global manner, two main constructs of the psychoanalytical theory, namely those of primary and secondary process [2, 3]. Finally, in the most recent period, Kandell's paper [4], stressing the need for an intimate relationship between psychoanalysis and cognitive neuroscience, has suggested a new way of investigating the links between hemispheric asymmetries and the psychoanalytic model of mind.",
author = "Guido Gainotti",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1007/88-470-0550-7_6",
language = "English",
isbn = "8847003342",
pages = "151--173",
booktitle = "Psychoanalysis and Neuroscience",
publisher = "Springer Milan",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Unconscious emotional memories and the right hemisphere

AU - Gainotti, Guido

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - The problem of the possible relationships between hemispheric asymmetries and aspects of the psychoanalytic model of mind has been repeatedly raised during the past century. In a rather arbitrary manner, we could even say that this problem has passed through three distinct stages. In the first stage (roughly covering the first part of the twentieth century), psychoanalytically oriented authors, although acknowledging that some clinical phenomena could suggest a special link between aspects of psychoanalytical theory and the right hemisphere, substantially rejected the specificity of these relationships. In the second period, influenced by the influential work on split-brain patients of Sperry and co-workers [1], the interest that the right hemisphere could have for psychoanalysis has been explicitly acknowledged, but this has been made focusing attention more on cognitive than on emotional features and mapping onto the right and left hemispheres, in a rather global manner, two main constructs of the psychoanalytical theory, namely those of primary and secondary process [2, 3]. Finally, in the most recent period, Kandell's paper [4], stressing the need for an intimate relationship between psychoanalysis and cognitive neuroscience, has suggested a new way of investigating the links between hemispheric asymmetries and the psychoanalytic model of mind.

AB - The problem of the possible relationships between hemispheric asymmetries and aspects of the psychoanalytic model of mind has been repeatedly raised during the past century. In a rather arbitrary manner, we could even say that this problem has passed through three distinct stages. In the first stage (roughly covering the first part of the twentieth century), psychoanalytically oriented authors, although acknowledging that some clinical phenomena could suggest a special link between aspects of psychoanalytical theory and the right hemisphere, substantially rejected the specificity of these relationships. In the second period, influenced by the influential work on split-brain patients of Sperry and co-workers [1], the interest that the right hemisphere could have for psychoanalysis has been explicitly acknowledged, but this has been made focusing attention more on cognitive than on emotional features and mapping onto the right and left hemispheres, in a rather global manner, two main constructs of the psychoanalytical theory, namely those of primary and secondary process [2, 3]. Finally, in the most recent period, Kandell's paper [4], stressing the need for an intimate relationship between psychoanalysis and cognitive neuroscience, has suggested a new way of investigating the links between hemispheric asymmetries and the psychoanalytic model of mind.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36049023148&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36049023148&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/88-470-0550-7_6

DO - 10.1007/88-470-0550-7_6

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:36049023148

SN - 8847003342

SN - 9788847003347

SP - 151

EP - 173

BT - Psychoanalysis and Neuroscience

PB - Springer Milan

ER -