Undermodeling affects minimal model indexes: Insights from a two- compartment model

Andrea Caumo, Paolo Vicini, Jeffrey J. Zachwieja, Angelo Avogaro, Kevin Yarasheski, Dennis M. Bier, Claudio Cobelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The classic (hereafter cold) and the labeled (hereafter hot) minimal models are powerful tools to investigate glucose metabolism. The cold model provides, from intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) data, indexes of glucose effectiveness (SG) and insulin sensitivity (S(I)) that measure the effect of glucose and insulin, respectively, to enhance glucose disappearance and inhibit endogenous glucose production. The hot model provides, from hot IVGTT data, indexes of glucose effectiveness (S(G)/*) and insulin sensitivity (S(I)/*) that, respectively, measure the effects of glucose and insulin on glucose disappearance only. Recent reports call for a reexamination of some of the assumptions of the minimal models. We have previously pointed out the criticality of the single-compartment description of glucose kinetics on which both the minimal models are founded. In this paper we evaluate the impact of single-compartment undermodeling on S(G), S(I), S(G)/*, and S(I)/* by using a two-compartment model to describe the glucose system. The relationships of the minimal model indexes to the analogous indexes measured with the glucose clamp technique are also examined. Theoretical analysis and simulation studies indicate that cold indexes are more affected than hot indexes by undermodeling. In particular, care must be exercised in the physiological interpretation of S(G), because this index is a local descriptor of events taking place in the initial portion of the IVGTT. As a consequence, S(G) not only reflects glucose effect on glucose uptake and production but also the rapid exchange of glucose between the accessible and nonaccessible glucose pools that occurs in the early part of the test.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAmerican Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism
Volume276
Issue number6 39-6
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1999

Fingerprint

Glucose
Glucose Tolerance Test
Insulin
Insulin Resistance
Glucose Clamp Technique
Clamping devices
Metabolism
Kinetics

Keywords

  • Glucose clamp
  • Glucose effectiveness
  • Insulin sensitivity
  • Intravenous glucose tolerance test
  • Mathematical model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Endocrinology
  • Biochemistry
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Caumo, A., Vicini, P., Zachwieja, J. J., Avogaro, A., Yarasheski, K., Bier, D. M., & Cobelli, C. (1999). Undermodeling affects minimal model indexes: Insights from a two- compartment model. American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism, 276(6 39-6).

Undermodeling affects minimal model indexes : Insights from a two- compartment model. / Caumo, Andrea; Vicini, Paolo; Zachwieja, Jeffrey J.; Avogaro, Angelo; Yarasheski, Kevin; Bier, Dennis M.; Cobelli, Claudio.

In: American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism, Vol. 276, No. 6 39-6, 06.1999.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Caumo, A, Vicini, P, Zachwieja, JJ, Avogaro, A, Yarasheski, K, Bier, DM & Cobelli, C 1999, 'Undermodeling affects minimal model indexes: Insights from a two- compartment model', American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 276, no. 6 39-6.
Caumo A, Vicini P, Zachwieja JJ, Avogaro A, Yarasheski K, Bier DM et al. Undermodeling affects minimal model indexes: Insights from a two- compartment model. American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism. 1999 Jun;276(6 39-6).
Caumo, Andrea ; Vicini, Paolo ; Zachwieja, Jeffrey J. ; Avogaro, Angelo ; Yarasheski, Kevin ; Bier, Dennis M. ; Cobelli, Claudio. / Undermodeling affects minimal model indexes : Insights from a two- compartment model. In: American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism. 1999 ; Vol. 276, No. 6 39-6.
@article{f9d7412f18274fd2a518c522723a4876,
title = "Undermodeling affects minimal model indexes: Insights from a two- compartment model",
abstract = "The classic (hereafter cold) and the labeled (hereafter hot) minimal models are powerful tools to investigate glucose metabolism. The cold model provides, from intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) data, indexes of glucose effectiveness (SG) and insulin sensitivity (S(I)) that measure the effect of glucose and insulin, respectively, to enhance glucose disappearance and inhibit endogenous glucose production. The hot model provides, from hot IVGTT data, indexes of glucose effectiveness (S(G)/*) and insulin sensitivity (S(I)/*) that, respectively, measure the effects of glucose and insulin on glucose disappearance only. Recent reports call for a reexamination of some of the assumptions of the minimal models. We have previously pointed out the criticality of the single-compartment description of glucose kinetics on which both the minimal models are founded. In this paper we evaluate the impact of single-compartment undermodeling on S(G), S(I), S(G)/*, and S(I)/* by using a two-compartment model to describe the glucose system. The relationships of the minimal model indexes to the analogous indexes measured with the glucose clamp technique are also examined. Theoretical analysis and simulation studies indicate that cold indexes are more affected than hot indexes by undermodeling. In particular, care must be exercised in the physiological interpretation of S(G), because this index is a local descriptor of events taking place in the initial portion of the IVGTT. As a consequence, S(G) not only reflects glucose effect on glucose uptake and production but also the rapid exchange of glucose between the accessible and nonaccessible glucose pools that occurs in the early part of the test.",
keywords = "Glucose clamp, Glucose effectiveness, Insulin sensitivity, Intravenous glucose tolerance test, Mathematical model",
author = "Andrea Caumo and Paolo Vicini and Zachwieja, {Jeffrey J.} and Angelo Avogaro and Kevin Yarasheski and Bier, {Dennis M.} and Claudio Cobelli",
year = "1999",
month = "6",
language = "English",
volume = "276",
journal = "American Journal of Physiology",
issn = "0363-6119",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "6 39-6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Undermodeling affects minimal model indexes

T2 - Insights from a two- compartment model

AU - Caumo, Andrea

AU - Vicini, Paolo

AU - Zachwieja, Jeffrey J.

AU - Avogaro, Angelo

AU - Yarasheski, Kevin

AU - Bier, Dennis M.

AU - Cobelli, Claudio

PY - 1999/6

Y1 - 1999/6

N2 - The classic (hereafter cold) and the labeled (hereafter hot) minimal models are powerful tools to investigate glucose metabolism. The cold model provides, from intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) data, indexes of glucose effectiveness (SG) and insulin sensitivity (S(I)) that measure the effect of glucose and insulin, respectively, to enhance glucose disappearance and inhibit endogenous glucose production. The hot model provides, from hot IVGTT data, indexes of glucose effectiveness (S(G)/*) and insulin sensitivity (S(I)/*) that, respectively, measure the effects of glucose and insulin on glucose disappearance only. Recent reports call for a reexamination of some of the assumptions of the minimal models. We have previously pointed out the criticality of the single-compartment description of glucose kinetics on which both the minimal models are founded. In this paper we evaluate the impact of single-compartment undermodeling on S(G), S(I), S(G)/*, and S(I)/* by using a two-compartment model to describe the glucose system. The relationships of the minimal model indexes to the analogous indexes measured with the glucose clamp technique are also examined. Theoretical analysis and simulation studies indicate that cold indexes are more affected than hot indexes by undermodeling. In particular, care must be exercised in the physiological interpretation of S(G), because this index is a local descriptor of events taking place in the initial portion of the IVGTT. As a consequence, S(G) not only reflects glucose effect on glucose uptake and production but also the rapid exchange of glucose between the accessible and nonaccessible glucose pools that occurs in the early part of the test.

AB - The classic (hereafter cold) and the labeled (hereafter hot) minimal models are powerful tools to investigate glucose metabolism. The cold model provides, from intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) data, indexes of glucose effectiveness (SG) and insulin sensitivity (S(I)) that measure the effect of glucose and insulin, respectively, to enhance glucose disappearance and inhibit endogenous glucose production. The hot model provides, from hot IVGTT data, indexes of glucose effectiveness (S(G)/*) and insulin sensitivity (S(I)/*) that, respectively, measure the effects of glucose and insulin on glucose disappearance only. Recent reports call for a reexamination of some of the assumptions of the minimal models. We have previously pointed out the criticality of the single-compartment description of glucose kinetics on which both the minimal models are founded. In this paper we evaluate the impact of single-compartment undermodeling on S(G), S(I), S(G)/*, and S(I)/* by using a two-compartment model to describe the glucose system. The relationships of the minimal model indexes to the analogous indexes measured with the glucose clamp technique are also examined. Theoretical analysis and simulation studies indicate that cold indexes are more affected than hot indexes by undermodeling. In particular, care must be exercised in the physiological interpretation of S(G), because this index is a local descriptor of events taking place in the initial portion of the IVGTT. As a consequence, S(G) not only reflects glucose effect on glucose uptake and production but also the rapid exchange of glucose between the accessible and nonaccessible glucose pools that occurs in the early part of the test.

KW - Glucose clamp

KW - Glucose effectiveness

KW - Insulin sensitivity

KW - Intravenous glucose tolerance test

KW - Mathematical model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033032471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033032471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10362630

AN - SCOPUS:0033032471

VL - 276

JO - American Journal of Physiology

JF - American Journal of Physiology

SN - 0363-6119

IS - 6 39-6

ER -