Understanding non-compliance to colorectal cancer screening: A case control study, nested in a randomised trial [ISRCTN83029072]

Paolo Giorgi Rossi, Antonio Federici, Francesco Bartolozzi, Sara Farchi, Piero Borgia, Gabriella Guasticchi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The major limit to colorectal cancer screening effectiveness is often low compliance. We studied the reasons for non compliance and determinants of compliance to faecal occult blood tests in Lazio, Italy. Methods: This is a case-control study nested within a trial that tested the effect of type of test and provider on colorectal cancer screening compliance. Non compliant trial subjects were classified as cases, and compliant subjects were classified as controls. We sampled 600 cases and 600 controls matched by their general practitioner, half were invited for screening at the hospital, and the other half directly at their general practitioner's office. Cases and controls answered questions on: distance from test provider, logistical problems, perception of colorectal cancer risk, confidence in screening efficacy, fear of results, presence of colorectal cancer in the family, and gastrointestinal symptoms. Results: About 31% of cases never received the letter offering free screening, and 17% of the sampled population had already been screened. The first reported reason for non-compliance was "lack of time" (30%); the major determinant of compliance was the distance from the test provider: odds ratio >30 minutes vs

Original languageEnglish
Article number139
JournalBMC Public Health
Volume5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 22 2005

Fingerprint

Early Detection of Cancer
Compliance
Case-Control Studies
Colorectal Neoplasms
General Practitioners
Occult Blood
Hematologic Tests
Italy
Fear
Odds Ratio
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Understanding non-compliance to colorectal cancer screening : A case control study, nested in a randomised trial [ISRCTN83029072]. / Rossi, Paolo Giorgi; Federici, Antonio; Bartolozzi, Francesco; Farchi, Sara; Borgia, Piero; Guasticchi, Gabriella.

In: BMC Public Health, Vol. 5, 139, 22.12.2005.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rossi, Paolo Giorgi ; Federici, Antonio ; Bartolozzi, Francesco ; Farchi, Sara ; Borgia, Piero ; Guasticchi, Gabriella. / Understanding non-compliance to colorectal cancer screening : A case control study, nested in a randomised trial [ISRCTN83029072]. In: BMC Public Health. 2005 ; Vol. 5.
@article{2c06c6b082604490926b5c4385aa518b,
title = "Understanding non-compliance to colorectal cancer screening: A case control study, nested in a randomised trial [ISRCTN83029072]",
abstract = "Background: The major limit to colorectal cancer screening effectiveness is often low compliance. We studied the reasons for non compliance and determinants of compliance to faecal occult blood tests in Lazio, Italy. Methods: This is a case-control study nested within a trial that tested the effect of type of test and provider on colorectal cancer screening compliance. Non compliant trial subjects were classified as cases, and compliant subjects were classified as controls. We sampled 600 cases and 600 controls matched by their general practitioner, half were invited for screening at the hospital, and the other half directly at their general practitioner's office. Cases and controls answered questions on: distance from test provider, logistical problems, perception of colorectal cancer risk, confidence in screening efficacy, fear of results, presence of colorectal cancer in the family, and gastrointestinal symptoms. Results: About 31{\%} of cases never received the letter offering free screening, and 17{\%} of the sampled population had already been screened. The first reported reason for non-compliance was {"}lack of time{"} (30{\%}); the major determinant of compliance was the distance from the test provider: odds ratio >30 minutes vs",
author = "Rossi, {Paolo Giorgi} and Antonio Federici and Francesco Bartolozzi and Sara Farchi and Piero Borgia and Gabriella Guasticchi",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2458-5-139",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
journal = "BMC Public Health",
issn = "1471-2458",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding non-compliance to colorectal cancer screening

T2 - A case control study, nested in a randomised trial [ISRCTN83029072]

AU - Rossi, Paolo Giorgi

AU - Federici, Antonio

AU - Bartolozzi, Francesco

AU - Farchi, Sara

AU - Borgia, Piero

AU - Guasticchi, Gabriella

PY - 2005/12/22

Y1 - 2005/12/22

N2 - Background: The major limit to colorectal cancer screening effectiveness is often low compliance. We studied the reasons for non compliance and determinants of compliance to faecal occult blood tests in Lazio, Italy. Methods: This is a case-control study nested within a trial that tested the effect of type of test and provider on colorectal cancer screening compliance. Non compliant trial subjects were classified as cases, and compliant subjects were classified as controls. We sampled 600 cases and 600 controls matched by their general practitioner, half were invited for screening at the hospital, and the other half directly at their general practitioner's office. Cases and controls answered questions on: distance from test provider, logistical problems, perception of colorectal cancer risk, confidence in screening efficacy, fear of results, presence of colorectal cancer in the family, and gastrointestinal symptoms. Results: About 31% of cases never received the letter offering free screening, and 17% of the sampled population had already been screened. The first reported reason for non-compliance was "lack of time" (30%); the major determinant of compliance was the distance from the test provider: odds ratio >30 minutes vs

AB - Background: The major limit to colorectal cancer screening effectiveness is often low compliance. We studied the reasons for non compliance and determinants of compliance to faecal occult blood tests in Lazio, Italy. Methods: This is a case-control study nested within a trial that tested the effect of type of test and provider on colorectal cancer screening compliance. Non compliant trial subjects were classified as cases, and compliant subjects were classified as controls. We sampled 600 cases and 600 controls matched by their general practitioner, half were invited for screening at the hospital, and the other half directly at their general practitioner's office. Cases and controls answered questions on: distance from test provider, logistical problems, perception of colorectal cancer risk, confidence in screening efficacy, fear of results, presence of colorectal cancer in the family, and gastrointestinal symptoms. Results: About 31% of cases never received the letter offering free screening, and 17% of the sampled population had already been screened. The first reported reason for non-compliance was "lack of time" (30%); the major determinant of compliance was the distance from the test provider: odds ratio >30 minutes vs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=31544460397&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=31544460397&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2458-5-139

DO - 10.1186/1471-2458-5-139

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:31544460397

VL - 5

JO - BMC Public Health

JF - BMC Public Health

SN - 1471-2458

M1 - 139

ER -