Unexpected recovery from a vegetative state or misdiagnosis?: Lesson learned from a case report

Antonino Naro, Rocco Salvatore Calabrò, Patrizia Pollicino, Carmen Lombardo, Placido Bramanti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Growing research is focusing on the identification of markers predicting recovery and demonstrating covert awareness in patients with chronic disorders of consciousness (DOC). Herein, we describe the case of a woman who emerged from unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) after four years, in whom an experimental protocol assessing brain connectivity predicted her awareness recovery, indicating a functional locked-in syndrome (FLIS) diagnosis.

CASE DESCRIPTION: A 68-year-old woman was admitted to our institute in 2012 in a UWS secondary to a severe brain hemorrhage, with a Coma Recovery Scale-Revised score of five. Her clinical conditions were stable for about two years, despite the intensive neurorehabilitation treatment. During hospitalization, she underwent a neurophysiological protocol demonstrating an extensive nociceptive processing within the pain matrix. After 3 years, our subject emerged from UWS, and then from minimally conscious state, being able to communicate properly.

DISCUSSION: Approaches investigating brain connectivity may be useful in DOC diagnosis and prognosis, highlighting residual brain networks subtending covert awareness. Hence, our case supports the necessity of taking into account FLIS diagnosis in DOC differential diagnosis and implementing paraclinical follow-up to intercept cases of possible, late recovery of consciousness, thus optimizing the most appropriate management and rehabilitative setting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)735-738
Number of pages4
JournalNeuroRehabilitation
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Unexpected recovery from a vegetative state or misdiagnosis?: Lesson learned from a case report'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this