Unilateral bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy

G. Fanelli, B. Borghi, A. Casati, L. Bertini, M. Montebugnoli, G. Torri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To compare unilateral and conventional bilateral bupivacaine spinal block in outpatients undergoing knee arthroscopy. Methods: One hundred healthy, premedicated patients randomly received conventional bilateral (n = 50) or unilateral (n = 50) spinal anesthesia with 8 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%. A lateral decubitus position after spinal injection was maintained in unilateral group for 15 min. Times from spinal injection to readiness for surgery, block resolution, and home discharge were recorded. Results: Three patients in each group were excluded due to failed block. Readiness for surgery required 13 min (5 - 25 min) with bilateral and 16 min (15 - 30) with unilateral spinal block (P = 0.0005). Sensory and motor blocks on the operated limb were T9 (T12 - T2) with a Bromage score 0/1/2/3: 0/2/0/45 in the unilateral group and T7 (T12 - T1) with Bromage score 0/1/2/3: 4/1/6/36 with bilateral block (P = 0.026 and P= 0.016, respectively). Vasopressor was required only in five bilateral patients (P = 0.02). Two segment regression of sensory level and home discharge required 81 ± 25 min and 281 ± 83 min with bilateral block, and 99 ± 28 min and 264 ± 95 min with unilateral block (P = 0.002 and P = 0.90, respectively). Conclusion: Seeking unilateral distribution of spinal anesthesia provided more profound and longer lasting block in the operated limb, less cardiovascular effects, and similar home discharge compared with bilateral spinal anesthesia, with only a slight delay in preparation time.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)746-751
Number of pages6
JournalCanadian Journal of Anesthesia
Volume47
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Spinal Anesthesia
Bupivacaine
Arthroscopy
Spinal Injections
Knee
Outpatients
Extremities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Fanelli, G., Borghi, B., Casati, A., Bertini, L., Montebugnoli, M., & Torri, G. (2000). Unilateral bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 47(8), 746-751.

Unilateral bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy. / Fanelli, G.; Borghi, B.; Casati, A.; Bertini, L.; Montebugnoli, M.; Torri, G.

In: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol. 47, No. 8, 2000, p. 746-751.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fanelli, G, Borghi, B, Casati, A, Bertini, L, Montebugnoli, M & Torri, G 2000, 'Unilateral bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy', Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 746-751.
Fanelli G, Borghi B, Casati A, Bertini L, Montebugnoli M, Torri G. Unilateral bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. 2000;47(8):746-751.
Fanelli, G. ; Borghi, B. ; Casati, A. ; Bertini, L. ; Montebugnoli, M. ; Torri, G. / Unilateral bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy. In: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. 2000 ; Vol. 47, No. 8. pp. 746-751.
@article{ebf0317bb7ef4a47b3234c2dd94c6e4d,
title = "Unilateral bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy",
abstract = "Purpose: To compare unilateral and conventional bilateral bupivacaine spinal block in outpatients undergoing knee arthroscopy. Methods: One hundred healthy, premedicated patients randomly received conventional bilateral (n = 50) or unilateral (n = 50) spinal anesthesia with 8 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5{\%}. A lateral decubitus position after spinal injection was maintained in unilateral group for 15 min. Times from spinal injection to readiness for surgery, block resolution, and home discharge were recorded. Results: Three patients in each group were excluded due to failed block. Readiness for surgery required 13 min (5 - 25 min) with bilateral and 16 min (15 - 30) with unilateral spinal block (P = 0.0005). Sensory and motor blocks on the operated limb were T9 (T12 - T2) with a Bromage score 0/1/2/3: 0/2/0/45 in the unilateral group and T7 (T12 - T1) with Bromage score 0/1/2/3: 4/1/6/36 with bilateral block (P = 0.026 and P= 0.016, respectively). Vasopressor was required only in five bilateral patients (P = 0.02). Two segment regression of sensory level and home discharge required 81 ± 25 min and 281 ± 83 min with bilateral block, and 99 ± 28 min and 264 ± 95 min with unilateral block (P = 0.002 and P = 0.90, respectively). Conclusion: Seeking unilateral distribution of spinal anesthesia provided more profound and longer lasting block in the operated limb, less cardiovascular effects, and similar home discharge compared with bilateral spinal anesthesia, with only a slight delay in preparation time.",
author = "G. Fanelli and B. Borghi and A. Casati and L. Bertini and M. Montebugnoli and G. Torri",
year = "2000",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "746--751",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia",
issn = "0832-610X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unilateral bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy

AU - Fanelli, G.

AU - Borghi, B.

AU - Casati, A.

AU - Bertini, L.

AU - Montebugnoli, M.

AU - Torri, G.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Purpose: To compare unilateral and conventional bilateral bupivacaine spinal block in outpatients undergoing knee arthroscopy. Methods: One hundred healthy, premedicated patients randomly received conventional bilateral (n = 50) or unilateral (n = 50) spinal anesthesia with 8 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%. A lateral decubitus position after spinal injection was maintained in unilateral group for 15 min. Times from spinal injection to readiness for surgery, block resolution, and home discharge were recorded. Results: Three patients in each group were excluded due to failed block. Readiness for surgery required 13 min (5 - 25 min) with bilateral and 16 min (15 - 30) with unilateral spinal block (P = 0.0005). Sensory and motor blocks on the operated limb were T9 (T12 - T2) with a Bromage score 0/1/2/3: 0/2/0/45 in the unilateral group and T7 (T12 - T1) with Bromage score 0/1/2/3: 4/1/6/36 with bilateral block (P = 0.026 and P= 0.016, respectively). Vasopressor was required only in five bilateral patients (P = 0.02). Two segment regression of sensory level and home discharge required 81 ± 25 min and 281 ± 83 min with bilateral block, and 99 ± 28 min and 264 ± 95 min with unilateral block (P = 0.002 and P = 0.90, respectively). Conclusion: Seeking unilateral distribution of spinal anesthesia provided more profound and longer lasting block in the operated limb, less cardiovascular effects, and similar home discharge compared with bilateral spinal anesthesia, with only a slight delay in preparation time.

AB - Purpose: To compare unilateral and conventional bilateral bupivacaine spinal block in outpatients undergoing knee arthroscopy. Methods: One hundred healthy, premedicated patients randomly received conventional bilateral (n = 50) or unilateral (n = 50) spinal anesthesia with 8 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%. A lateral decubitus position after spinal injection was maintained in unilateral group for 15 min. Times from spinal injection to readiness for surgery, block resolution, and home discharge were recorded. Results: Three patients in each group were excluded due to failed block. Readiness for surgery required 13 min (5 - 25 min) with bilateral and 16 min (15 - 30) with unilateral spinal block (P = 0.0005). Sensory and motor blocks on the operated limb were T9 (T12 - T2) with a Bromage score 0/1/2/3: 0/2/0/45 in the unilateral group and T7 (T12 - T1) with Bromage score 0/1/2/3: 4/1/6/36 with bilateral block (P = 0.026 and P= 0.016, respectively). Vasopressor was required only in five bilateral patients (P = 0.02). Two segment regression of sensory level and home discharge required 81 ± 25 min and 281 ± 83 min with bilateral block, and 99 ± 28 min and 264 ± 95 min with unilateral block (P = 0.002 and P = 0.90, respectively). Conclusion: Seeking unilateral distribution of spinal anesthesia provided more profound and longer lasting block in the operated limb, less cardiovascular effects, and similar home discharge compared with bilateral spinal anesthesia, with only a slight delay in preparation time.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033816282&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033816282&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10958090

AN - SCOPUS:0033816282

VL - 47

SP - 746

EP - 751

JO - Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia

JF - Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia

SN - 0832-610X

IS - 8

ER -