Urethral retro-resistance pressure and urodynamic diagnoses in women with lower urinary tract symptoms

G. Alessandro Digesu, Stavros Athanasiou, Charlotte Chaliha, Stylianos Michalas, Stefano Salvatore, Luigi Selvaggi, Vik Khullar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This study determines whether the retrograde urethral retro-resistance pressure (URP) measurement discriminates between urodynamic diagnoses in a group of women. Design: A prospective observational study. Setting: Urogynaecology units of three tertiary referral teaching hospitals. Population: Women with lower urinary tract symptoms. Methods: Consecutive women attending the urodynamic clinics of three tertiary referral teaching hospitals were studied using a validated urinary symptom questionnaire, URP measurement and urodynamic evaluation between February and July 2004. The URP mean values were compared with urinary symptoms and urodynamic diagnoses, using the independent t test correction for multiple measurements. Main outcome measures: Retrograde URP, urodynamic diagnoses and urinary symptoms. Results: One hundred and eighty-five women were recruited. Women with urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) have significantly lower URP than women with competent urethral sphincters (P <0.05, independent t test). Women with mixed urodynamic incontinence had values of URP intermediate between women with detrusor overactivity (DOA) and those with USI. In the mixed group, URP mean values were not significantly different from those with DOA and competent sphincters or USI (P > 0.05, independent t test). Conclusions: There was no significant difference between mean URP values and different urinary symptoms (P > 0.05, independent t test). There are significantly different URP measurements between women with DOA and those with USI. However, the URP is not a diagnostic tool.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)34-38
Number of pages5
JournalBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume113
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2006

Fingerprint

Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
Urodynamics
Pressure
Tertiary Care Centers
Teaching Hospitals
Urethra
Observational Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Prospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

Urethral retro-resistance pressure and urodynamic diagnoses in women with lower urinary tract symptoms. / Digesu, G. Alessandro; Athanasiou, Stavros; Chaliha, Charlotte; Michalas, Stylianos; Salvatore, Stefano; Selvaggi, Luigi; Khullar, Vik.

In: BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 113, No. 1, 01.2006, p. 34-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Digesu, G. Alessandro ; Athanasiou, Stavros ; Chaliha, Charlotte ; Michalas, Stylianos ; Salvatore, Stefano ; Selvaggi, Luigi ; Khullar, Vik. / Urethral retro-resistance pressure and urodynamic diagnoses in women with lower urinary tract symptoms. In: BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2006 ; Vol. 113, No. 1. pp. 34-38.
@article{f8e93a31b02f47aea0ab1d9904b151e2,
title = "Urethral retro-resistance pressure and urodynamic diagnoses in women with lower urinary tract symptoms",
abstract = "Objective: This study determines whether the retrograde urethral retro-resistance pressure (URP) measurement discriminates between urodynamic diagnoses in a group of women. Design: A prospective observational study. Setting: Urogynaecology units of three tertiary referral teaching hospitals. Population: Women with lower urinary tract symptoms. Methods: Consecutive women attending the urodynamic clinics of three tertiary referral teaching hospitals were studied using a validated urinary symptom questionnaire, URP measurement and urodynamic evaluation between February and July 2004. The URP mean values were compared with urinary symptoms and urodynamic diagnoses, using the independent t test correction for multiple measurements. Main outcome measures: Retrograde URP, urodynamic diagnoses and urinary symptoms. Results: One hundred and eighty-five women were recruited. Women with urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) have significantly lower URP than women with competent urethral sphincters (P <0.05, independent t test). Women with mixed urodynamic incontinence had values of URP intermediate between women with detrusor overactivity (DOA) and those with USI. In the mixed group, URP mean values were not significantly different from those with DOA and competent sphincters or USI (P > 0.05, independent t test). Conclusions: There was no significant difference between mean URP values and different urinary symptoms (P > 0.05, independent t test). There are significantly different URP measurements between women with DOA and those with USI. However, the URP is not a diagnostic tool.",
author = "Digesu, {G. Alessandro} and Stavros Athanasiou and Charlotte Chaliha and Stylianos Michalas and Stefano Salvatore and Luigi Selvaggi and Vik Khullar",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00787.x",
language = "English",
volume = "113",
pages = "34--38",
journal = "BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology",
issn = "1470-0328",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Urethral retro-resistance pressure and urodynamic diagnoses in women with lower urinary tract symptoms

AU - Digesu, G. Alessandro

AU - Athanasiou, Stavros

AU - Chaliha, Charlotte

AU - Michalas, Stylianos

AU - Salvatore, Stefano

AU - Selvaggi, Luigi

AU - Khullar, Vik

PY - 2006/1

Y1 - 2006/1

N2 - Objective: This study determines whether the retrograde urethral retro-resistance pressure (URP) measurement discriminates between urodynamic diagnoses in a group of women. Design: A prospective observational study. Setting: Urogynaecology units of three tertiary referral teaching hospitals. Population: Women with lower urinary tract symptoms. Methods: Consecutive women attending the urodynamic clinics of three tertiary referral teaching hospitals were studied using a validated urinary symptom questionnaire, URP measurement and urodynamic evaluation between February and July 2004. The URP mean values were compared with urinary symptoms and urodynamic diagnoses, using the independent t test correction for multiple measurements. Main outcome measures: Retrograde URP, urodynamic diagnoses and urinary symptoms. Results: One hundred and eighty-five women were recruited. Women with urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) have significantly lower URP than women with competent urethral sphincters (P <0.05, independent t test). Women with mixed urodynamic incontinence had values of URP intermediate between women with detrusor overactivity (DOA) and those with USI. In the mixed group, URP mean values were not significantly different from those with DOA and competent sphincters or USI (P > 0.05, independent t test). Conclusions: There was no significant difference between mean URP values and different urinary symptoms (P > 0.05, independent t test). There are significantly different URP measurements between women with DOA and those with USI. However, the URP is not a diagnostic tool.

AB - Objective: This study determines whether the retrograde urethral retro-resistance pressure (URP) measurement discriminates between urodynamic diagnoses in a group of women. Design: A prospective observational study. Setting: Urogynaecology units of three tertiary referral teaching hospitals. Population: Women with lower urinary tract symptoms. Methods: Consecutive women attending the urodynamic clinics of three tertiary referral teaching hospitals were studied using a validated urinary symptom questionnaire, URP measurement and urodynamic evaluation between February and July 2004. The URP mean values were compared with urinary symptoms and urodynamic diagnoses, using the independent t test correction for multiple measurements. Main outcome measures: Retrograde URP, urodynamic diagnoses and urinary symptoms. Results: One hundred and eighty-five women were recruited. Women with urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) have significantly lower URP than women with competent urethral sphincters (P <0.05, independent t test). Women with mixed urodynamic incontinence had values of URP intermediate between women with detrusor overactivity (DOA) and those with USI. In the mixed group, URP mean values were not significantly different from those with DOA and competent sphincters or USI (P > 0.05, independent t test). Conclusions: There was no significant difference between mean URP values and different urinary symptoms (P > 0.05, independent t test). There are significantly different URP measurements between women with DOA and those with USI. However, the URP is not a diagnostic tool.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644807640&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644807640&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00787.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00787.x

M3 - Article

VL - 113

SP - 34

EP - 38

JO - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

JF - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

SN - 1470-0328

IS - 1

ER -