Using a high-flow nasal cannula provided superior results to low-flow oxygen delivery in moderate to severe bronchiolitis

Gregorio P. Milani, Anna M. Plebani, Elisa Arturi, Danila Brusa, Susanna Esposito, Laura Dell'Era, Emanuela A. Laicini, Dario Consonni, Carlo Agostoni, Emilio F. Fossali

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aim: An observational study was carried out on infants with moderate to severe bronchiolitis to compare the clinical outcomes following treatment with a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) or standard low-flow oxygen. Methods: We enrolled subjects below 12 months of age who were affected by their first bronchiolitis episode. Non-formal randomisation, based on HFNC availability, was used to assign subjects to either the HFNC or standard oxygen groups. Respiratory rate, respiratory effort and the ability to feed were compared between the two groups at enrolment and at regular time points. The oxygen requirements and the length of hospital stay were also analysed. Results: Overall, 36 of the 40 enrolled infants completed the study: 18 treated with HFNC (mean age 3.2 months, range 1.2-5.4 months) and 18 with low-flow oxygen delivery (mean age 3.6 months, range 1.3-5.0 months). Improvements in the respiratory rate, respiratory effort and ability to feed were significantly faster in the HFNC group than the low-flow oxygen group. The HNFC group needed oxygen supplementation for two days less than the other group and hospital stays were three days shorter. Conclusion: HFNC provided superior clinical outcomes for infants under 12 months with moderate-to-severe bronchiolitis compared to low-flow oxygen.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e368-e372
Number of pages5
JournalActa Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics
Volume105
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Bronchiolitis
Oxygen
Length of Stay
Respiratory Rate
Random Allocation
Cannula
Observational Studies

Keywords

  • Bronchiolitis
  • High-flow nasal cannula
  • Low-flow oxygen delivery
  • Non-invasive ventilation
  • Respiratory infection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Using a high-flow nasal cannula provided superior results to low-flow oxygen delivery in moderate to severe bronchiolitis. / Milani, Gregorio P.; Plebani, Anna M.; Arturi, Elisa; Brusa, Danila; Esposito, Susanna; Dell'Era, Laura; Laicini, Emanuela A.; Consonni, Dario; Agostoni, Carlo; Fossali, Emilio F.

In: Acta Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics, Vol. 105, No. 8, 2016, p. e368-e372.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{850af74f6def4bf7a3ec775529f16032,
title = "Using a high-flow nasal cannula provided superior results to low-flow oxygen delivery in moderate to severe bronchiolitis",
abstract = "Aim: An observational study was carried out on infants with moderate to severe bronchiolitis to compare the clinical outcomes following treatment with a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) or standard low-flow oxygen. Methods: We enrolled subjects below 12 months of age who were affected by their first bronchiolitis episode. Non-formal randomisation, based on HFNC availability, was used to assign subjects to either the HFNC or standard oxygen groups. Respiratory rate, respiratory effort and the ability to feed were compared between the two groups at enrolment and at regular time points. The oxygen requirements and the length of hospital stay were also analysed. Results: Overall, 36 of the 40 enrolled infants completed the study: 18 treated with HFNC (mean age 3.2 months, range 1.2-5.4 months) and 18 with low-flow oxygen delivery (mean age 3.6 months, range 1.3-5.0 months). Improvements in the respiratory rate, respiratory effort and ability to feed were significantly faster in the HFNC group than the low-flow oxygen group. The HNFC group needed oxygen supplementation for two days less than the other group and hospital stays were three days shorter. Conclusion: HFNC provided superior clinical outcomes for infants under 12 months with moderate-to-severe bronchiolitis compared to low-flow oxygen.",
keywords = "Bronchiolitis, High-flow nasal cannula, Low-flow oxygen delivery, Non-invasive ventilation, Respiratory infection",
author = "Milani, {Gregorio P.} and Plebani, {Anna M.} and Elisa Arturi and Danila Brusa and Susanna Esposito and Laura Dell'Era and Laicini, {Emanuela A.} and Dario Consonni and Carlo Agostoni and Fossali, {Emilio F.}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1111/apa.13444",
language = "English",
volume = "105",
pages = "e368--e372",
journal = "Acta Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics",
issn = "0803-5253",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using a high-flow nasal cannula provided superior results to low-flow oxygen delivery in moderate to severe bronchiolitis

AU - Milani, Gregorio P.

AU - Plebani, Anna M.

AU - Arturi, Elisa

AU - Brusa, Danila

AU - Esposito, Susanna

AU - Dell'Era, Laura

AU - Laicini, Emanuela A.

AU - Consonni, Dario

AU - Agostoni, Carlo

AU - Fossali, Emilio F.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Aim: An observational study was carried out on infants with moderate to severe bronchiolitis to compare the clinical outcomes following treatment with a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) or standard low-flow oxygen. Methods: We enrolled subjects below 12 months of age who were affected by their first bronchiolitis episode. Non-formal randomisation, based on HFNC availability, was used to assign subjects to either the HFNC or standard oxygen groups. Respiratory rate, respiratory effort and the ability to feed were compared between the two groups at enrolment and at regular time points. The oxygen requirements and the length of hospital stay were also analysed. Results: Overall, 36 of the 40 enrolled infants completed the study: 18 treated with HFNC (mean age 3.2 months, range 1.2-5.4 months) and 18 with low-flow oxygen delivery (mean age 3.6 months, range 1.3-5.0 months). Improvements in the respiratory rate, respiratory effort and ability to feed were significantly faster in the HFNC group than the low-flow oxygen group. The HNFC group needed oxygen supplementation for two days less than the other group and hospital stays were three days shorter. Conclusion: HFNC provided superior clinical outcomes for infants under 12 months with moderate-to-severe bronchiolitis compared to low-flow oxygen.

AB - Aim: An observational study was carried out on infants with moderate to severe bronchiolitis to compare the clinical outcomes following treatment with a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) or standard low-flow oxygen. Methods: We enrolled subjects below 12 months of age who were affected by their first bronchiolitis episode. Non-formal randomisation, based on HFNC availability, was used to assign subjects to either the HFNC or standard oxygen groups. Respiratory rate, respiratory effort and the ability to feed were compared between the two groups at enrolment and at regular time points. The oxygen requirements and the length of hospital stay were also analysed. Results: Overall, 36 of the 40 enrolled infants completed the study: 18 treated with HFNC (mean age 3.2 months, range 1.2-5.4 months) and 18 with low-flow oxygen delivery (mean age 3.6 months, range 1.3-5.0 months). Improvements in the respiratory rate, respiratory effort and ability to feed were significantly faster in the HFNC group than the low-flow oxygen group. The HNFC group needed oxygen supplementation for two days less than the other group and hospital stays were three days shorter. Conclusion: HFNC provided superior clinical outcomes for infants under 12 months with moderate-to-severe bronchiolitis compared to low-flow oxygen.

KW - Bronchiolitis

KW - High-flow nasal cannula

KW - Low-flow oxygen delivery

KW - Non-invasive ventilation

KW - Respiratory infection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969964153&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84969964153&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/apa.13444

DO - 10.1111/apa.13444

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84969964153

VL - 105

SP - e368-e372

JO - Acta Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics

JF - Acta Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics

SN - 0803-5253

IS - 8

ER -