Using stimulating catheters for continuous sciatic nerve block shortens onset time of surgical block and minimizes postoperative consumption of pain medication after halux valgus repair as compared with conventional nonstimulating catheters

Andrea Casati, Guido Fanelli, Zbigniew Koscielniak-Nielsen, Gianluca Cappelleri, Giorgio Aldegheri, Giorgio Danelli, Régis Fuzier, François Singelyn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

66 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We prospectively tested the hypothesis that the use of a stimulating catheter improves the efficacy of continuous posterior popliteal sciatic nerve block in 100 randomized patients scheduled for elective orthopedic foot surgery. After eliciting a sciatic mediated muscular twitch at ≤0.5 mA nerve stimulation output, the perineural catheter was advanced 2-4 cm beyond the tip of the introducer either blindly (Group C; n = 50) or stimulating via the catheter (Group S; n = 50). A bolus dose of 25 mL of 1.5% mepivacaine was followed by a postoperative patient-controlled infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine (basal infusion: 3 mL/h; incremental dose: 5 mL; lockout time: 30 min). Propacetamol 2 g IV was administered every 8 h, and opioid rescue analgesia was available if required. Catheter placement required 7 ± 2 min in Group S and 5 ± 2 min in Group C (P = 0.056). A significantly shorter onset time of both sensory and motor blocks was noted in Group S. No difference in quality of pain relief at rest and during motion was reported between the groups. Median (range) local anesthetic consumption during the first 48 h after surgery was 239 mL (175-519 mL) and 322 mL (184-508 mL) in Groups S and C, respectively (P = 0.002). Rescue opioid analgesia was required by 12 (25%) and 28 (58%) patients in Groups S and C, respectively (P = 0.002). We conclude that the use of a stimulating catheter results in shorter onset time of posterior popliteal sciatic nerve block, similar pain relief with reduced postoperative consumption of local anesthetic solution, and less rescue opioid consumption.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1192-1197
Number of pages6
JournalAnesthesia and Analgesia
Volume101
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2005

Fingerprint

Nerve Block
Sciatic Nerve
Postoperative Pain
Catheters
Opioid Analgesics
Local Anesthetics
Analgesia
Mepivacaine
Pain
Orthopedics
Foot

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Using stimulating catheters for continuous sciatic nerve block shortens onset time of surgical block and minimizes postoperative consumption of pain medication after halux valgus repair as compared with conventional nonstimulating catheters. / Casati, Andrea; Fanelli, Guido; Koscielniak-Nielsen, Zbigniew; Cappelleri, Gianluca; Aldegheri, Giorgio; Danelli, Giorgio; Fuzier, Régis; Singelyn, François.

In: Anesthesia and Analgesia, Vol. 101, No. 4, 10.2005, p. 1192-1197.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Casati, Andrea ; Fanelli, Guido ; Koscielniak-Nielsen, Zbigniew ; Cappelleri, Gianluca ; Aldegheri, Giorgio ; Danelli, Giorgio ; Fuzier, Régis ; Singelyn, François. / Using stimulating catheters for continuous sciatic nerve block shortens onset time of surgical block and minimizes postoperative consumption of pain medication after halux valgus repair as compared with conventional nonstimulating catheters. In: Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2005 ; Vol. 101, No. 4. pp. 1192-1197.
@article{9349ed0db0b74341a487f988a4c0af53,
title = "Using stimulating catheters for continuous sciatic nerve block shortens onset time of surgical block and minimizes postoperative consumption of pain medication after halux valgus repair as compared with conventional nonstimulating catheters",
abstract = "We prospectively tested the hypothesis that the use of a stimulating catheter improves the efficacy of continuous posterior popliteal sciatic nerve block in 100 randomized patients scheduled for elective orthopedic foot surgery. After eliciting a sciatic mediated muscular twitch at ≤0.5 mA nerve stimulation output, the perineural catheter was advanced 2-4 cm beyond the tip of the introducer either blindly (Group C; n = 50) or stimulating via the catheter (Group S; n = 50). A bolus dose of 25 mL of 1.5{\%} mepivacaine was followed by a postoperative patient-controlled infusion of 0.2{\%} ropivacaine (basal infusion: 3 mL/h; incremental dose: 5 mL; lockout time: 30 min). Propacetamol 2 g IV was administered every 8 h, and opioid rescue analgesia was available if required. Catheter placement required 7 ± 2 min in Group S and 5 ± 2 min in Group C (P = 0.056). A significantly shorter onset time of both sensory and motor blocks was noted in Group S. No difference in quality of pain relief at rest and during motion was reported between the groups. Median (range) local anesthetic consumption during the first 48 h after surgery was 239 mL (175-519 mL) and 322 mL (184-508 mL) in Groups S and C, respectively (P = 0.002). Rescue opioid analgesia was required by 12 (25{\%}) and 28 (58{\%}) patients in Groups S and C, respectively (P = 0.002). We conclude that the use of a stimulating catheter results in shorter onset time of posterior popliteal sciatic nerve block, similar pain relief with reduced postoperative consumption of local anesthetic solution, and less rescue opioid consumption.",
author = "Andrea Casati and Guido Fanelli and Zbigniew Koscielniak-Nielsen and Gianluca Cappelleri and Giorgio Aldegheri and Giorgio Danelli and R{\'e}gis Fuzier and Fran{\cc}ois Singelyn",
year = "2005",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1213/01.ane.0000167232.10305.cd",
language = "English",
volume = "101",
pages = "1192--1197",
journal = "Anesthesia and Analgesia",
issn = "0003-2999",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using stimulating catheters for continuous sciatic nerve block shortens onset time of surgical block and minimizes postoperative consumption of pain medication after halux valgus repair as compared with conventional nonstimulating catheters

AU - Casati, Andrea

AU - Fanelli, Guido

AU - Koscielniak-Nielsen, Zbigniew

AU - Cappelleri, Gianluca

AU - Aldegheri, Giorgio

AU - Danelli, Giorgio

AU - Fuzier, Régis

AU - Singelyn, François

PY - 2005/10

Y1 - 2005/10

N2 - We prospectively tested the hypothesis that the use of a stimulating catheter improves the efficacy of continuous posterior popliteal sciatic nerve block in 100 randomized patients scheduled for elective orthopedic foot surgery. After eliciting a sciatic mediated muscular twitch at ≤0.5 mA nerve stimulation output, the perineural catheter was advanced 2-4 cm beyond the tip of the introducer either blindly (Group C; n = 50) or stimulating via the catheter (Group S; n = 50). A bolus dose of 25 mL of 1.5% mepivacaine was followed by a postoperative patient-controlled infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine (basal infusion: 3 mL/h; incremental dose: 5 mL; lockout time: 30 min). Propacetamol 2 g IV was administered every 8 h, and opioid rescue analgesia was available if required. Catheter placement required 7 ± 2 min in Group S and 5 ± 2 min in Group C (P = 0.056). A significantly shorter onset time of both sensory and motor blocks was noted in Group S. No difference in quality of pain relief at rest and during motion was reported between the groups. Median (range) local anesthetic consumption during the first 48 h after surgery was 239 mL (175-519 mL) and 322 mL (184-508 mL) in Groups S and C, respectively (P = 0.002). Rescue opioid analgesia was required by 12 (25%) and 28 (58%) patients in Groups S and C, respectively (P = 0.002). We conclude that the use of a stimulating catheter results in shorter onset time of posterior popliteal sciatic nerve block, similar pain relief with reduced postoperative consumption of local anesthetic solution, and less rescue opioid consumption.

AB - We prospectively tested the hypothesis that the use of a stimulating catheter improves the efficacy of continuous posterior popliteal sciatic nerve block in 100 randomized patients scheduled for elective orthopedic foot surgery. After eliciting a sciatic mediated muscular twitch at ≤0.5 mA nerve stimulation output, the perineural catheter was advanced 2-4 cm beyond the tip of the introducer either blindly (Group C; n = 50) or stimulating via the catheter (Group S; n = 50). A bolus dose of 25 mL of 1.5% mepivacaine was followed by a postoperative patient-controlled infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine (basal infusion: 3 mL/h; incremental dose: 5 mL; lockout time: 30 min). Propacetamol 2 g IV was administered every 8 h, and opioid rescue analgesia was available if required. Catheter placement required 7 ± 2 min in Group S and 5 ± 2 min in Group C (P = 0.056). A significantly shorter onset time of both sensory and motor blocks was noted in Group S. No difference in quality of pain relief at rest and during motion was reported between the groups. Median (range) local anesthetic consumption during the first 48 h after surgery was 239 mL (175-519 mL) and 322 mL (184-508 mL) in Groups S and C, respectively (P = 0.002). Rescue opioid analgesia was required by 12 (25%) and 28 (58%) patients in Groups S and C, respectively (P = 0.002). We conclude that the use of a stimulating catheter results in shorter onset time of posterior popliteal sciatic nerve block, similar pain relief with reduced postoperative consumption of local anesthetic solution, and less rescue opioid consumption.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=25644438410&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=25644438410&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1213/01.ane.0000167232.10305.cd

DO - 10.1213/01.ane.0000167232.10305.cd

M3 - Article

C2 - 16192543

AN - SCOPUS:25644438410

VL - 101

SP - 1192

EP - 1197

JO - Anesthesia and Analgesia

JF - Anesthesia and Analgesia

SN - 0003-2999

IS - 4

ER -