Validated methods for assessment of subclinical atherosclerosis in rheumatology

György Kerekes, Pál Soltész, Michael T. Nurmohamed, Miguel A. Gonzalez-Gay, Maurizio Turiel, Edit Végh, Yehuda Shoenfeld, Iain McInnes, Zoltán Szekanecz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis, as well as other types of arthritides and connective tissue diseases, is associated with accelerated atherosclerosis, and increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The early signs of cardiovascular disease therefore need to be recognized in patients with these conditions so that effective cardiovascular protection can be introduced. This Review provides an overview of validated techniques that are currently available to determine subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with rheumatic conditions. Techniques for early assessment of endothelial dysfunction include brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation and laser Doppler flowmetry. Coronary circulation can be assessed by measuring coronary flow reserve using CT, MRI or PET based techniques. The standard indicators of arterial stiffness are pulse-wave velocity and the augmentation index. Carotid atherosclerosis is determined by the common carotid intima - media thickness (ccIMT) measurement or by the assessment of plaques and plaque areas. The combination of ccIMT with plaque assessment is likely to increase the predictive value of this approach. The potential use of a multimarker approach to increase the diagnostic and prognostic value of these clinical assessments is also discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)224-234
Number of pages11
JournalNature Reviews Rheumatology
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2012

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rheumatology

Cite this

Kerekes, G., Soltész, P., Nurmohamed, M. T., Gonzalez-Gay, M. A., Turiel, M., Végh, E., Shoenfeld, Y., McInnes, I., & Szekanecz, Z. (2012). Validated methods for assessment of subclinical atherosclerosis in rheumatology. Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 8(4), 224-234. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2012.16